The Rated PG The Rated PG

U.S. people--our president is giving state of union address

U.S. people--our president is giving state of union address

go watch

Powered by SkinBrowser!
31,286 views 126 replies
Reply #51 Top
Brad, I absolutely do NOT trust the man. To me, everything he says sounds like a lie. I don't know what it is about him, I extremely dislike him. Even if he said "My name is George W. Bush." I'd feel like shouting: "LIAR!".
I don't know, it's something in his eyes that make me shiver. Brr!
Reply #52 Top
His eyes?

Do you think his Wife writes his stuff like Clinton's did?
Reply #53 Top
Thanks everybody


Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #54 Top
Paxx, no offense but I suspect you'd say the same thing about any Republican. You probably felt the same way about George Bush I and Ronald Reagan.

Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #55 Top
So many people seem to prefer the Pres from the West Wing.....
Reply #56 Top
Oooh, oooh! I do! I do!

To both Frogboy and Jafo. ^_^


Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #57 Top
I slept through it, he always has that affect on me

Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #58 Top
Should of had a cup of OC's espresso
Reply #59 Top
You're right Brad. But it seems especially true to this one. It's hard to explain, there is a glimmer of evil in his eyes, something malicious.
Reply #60 Top
Ah...if only he used his super-powers for niceness....
Reply #61 Top
Mr. S. Hussien has to go at some time. However I would like to see the rest of the U.N. back up the U.S. Personally I do not like our President. Paxx is right about his eyes, they're shifty and elusive, no human contact. Like we country folk say - weasel like.
Reply #62 Top
WA-HA-eeeeezel as Polly Shore would say

Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #63 Top
Hold on laughing....I love that Polly Shore he is sooo funny! Oh and to Old Crab and Paxx, now that I'm thinkin about it, there is something about those eyes.

Okay now what happen to that Adam white or whatever the hell his name is. Can't we get rid of that guy somehow? I cannot stand rude poeple like that. > What the heck is his problem?
Reply #64 Top
First, Bush Jr. isn't the brightest President that we've had...but, IMHO, he's doing a great job.

Second, that wasn't a 'State Of The Union' address.....it was a "Declaration Of War" address
Reply #65 Top
My "republican newsletter" sent me the whole State of the Union address in an email. Anyone want it
Reply #66 Top
*shudders* Thanks for the offer KG - but I think I got the gist of it from the Post and Times this morning.


Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #67 Top
kthxbye, Doc Roger suggest you take 2 Jimmy Carter's and a half cup clinton and call me in the morning It seems he's doing his job, but the job he's doing should have been done years ago

Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #68 Top
An 'outsider's' observations.
The object of democratic elections is to vote a political party into office based on their policies for running a country for the benefit of the citizens of that country, aka "The Voters".
As I understand the situation, and this is only based on conversations with many of my American friends (plus a few 'enemies!), some 50% of the population were not motivated to vote at the last elections, 25% voted for the Republicans and 25% for the Democrats, the outcome being a dubious result by a slim margin to the present incumbent.
Those who did not bother to vote have nothing to bitch about as they gave up that right by not voting.
The 'Cult of Personality' is a disturbing one in a supposedly democratic country, very much so when it comes down to choosing a government based on (IMHO) a 'leader' who has had a personality bypass!
One does not need to be a rocket scientist to understand the words spoken by Mr Bush are not his own, rather those of all the vested interests who financed his 'election' and now write the scripts.
Food for thought, Mr Bush Senior was a serving officer who saw combat in WW2, one of the most able Directors of the CIA (my own opinion again) in a period when that organization had been devalued, and was removed from that position due to a political appointment as a result of a change in government, obviously merit and experience count less than 'Jobs for the boys'.
Mr Bush Junior has no experience in any field of endeavor, (politics don't count btw) has had a privileged life, but appears to be an expert on what is 'right for the world' and is prepared to ship of his Countrymen and Women to fight in a sphere which has one thing going for it, oil, oil and more oil.
The office he holds is 'President of the United States', NOT 'President of the World' ...... Hussein is the leader of a sovereign nation, right or wrong, has done nothing 'wrong' that has been proved beyond reasonable doubt, and if Mr Bush and his administration proceed without UN sanction against Iraq, well, who is the aggressor?
More to the point, the overused and misunderstood title of 'War Criminal' might end up at the White House.
No argument, Hussein is an evil bastard, however, he is the Middle Eastern nations "own" evil bastard.
The speech given by Mr Bush was not a bad one, taken as a 'speech' in a literary manner, despite the obvious holes in policy.
Of course, some unknown group of writers are behind it, along with who knows how many lobbyists and policy makers.
How the pre-election promises are to bet met remains a mystery, as does the funding of the 'War against Terrorism', the last being one of the great oxymoron's of the present day.
Rampant inflation is a probable result, as usual, it will hit the average citizen and the poor sods who live on or below the poverty line ...... but not the "Bush Family and Close Circle of Friends" (gross cynicism!) or those on comfortable incomes.
As is the way of the World, us dumb Australians will stand alongside our US Allies because that is what Allies do.
Before the usual rabble stomp on me, I have lived and worked in the US, if one can use that term regarding military exchange duty.
I have a great admiration for the people I know on a personal level and I do respect the level of patriotism shown by the average citizen (albeit a bit over the top from time to time) of the United States.
Sadly, politicians manipulate that patriotism for their own (often) shady ends.
I don't 'like' Mr Bush on a superficial level but then again, I don't know the man, in a similar vein, Mr Gore was not impressive but the same caveat applies, it's a surface evaluation.
To me, the Clintons appeared to be good for America, and to an outsider, the pair had that indefinable quality known as charisma, but ..... "outsider" is the operative word.
My last remark is one made by a friend in Texas (not you Lloyd, relax!) who commented that Mr Bush was known as 'The Shrub' by many in his home state, too immature to be a 'Bush'......
However, the answer to the present crisis is not with the 'Hawks' or the 'Doves', it lies midway between these factions.
As always, the loudest voices in favour of 'War' are those who get to sit at home and devour CNN .... as one who has been there, I must say it is NOT a video game and NOT intended as 'Entertainment'!
I'll get out of the way now, before the buckets are tipped!

Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #69 Top
He announced a huge investment into fuel-cell research, so every American can drive an ecological friendly car in 2020. I think the investment is some 1.5 billion or something?
Anyway, that is HUGE news. Much more interesting or relevant than attacking Iraq or not.
So why hasn't anybody talked about it yet in 68 posts? I just know cause it was on Tech Live (Tech TV). I was watching hockey and playing with my new installation of Red Hat Linux 8.0 last night (amazing stuff by the way. Waaay cool!).

So, are we finally start driving cars that only generate water fumes?
Reply #70 Top
paxx, vested interests for one and 20020 is way beyond any possible life of the present administration.
Or .... how about 'talk is cheap'?
In very rough figures 1.5 billion over what, 17 years is not great and it smells of playing to the green movement.
Call me a cynic .... >

Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #71 Top
Some of us who are "loudest" in favor of military action have children that they don't want to see having to go fight in some future nuclear battlefield because we didn't act when the cost was far lower.

Wombat, you have an offensive attitude in the way you trivialize the opinions of those who hold beliefs that aren't the same as yours.

I don't personally like Bush. The person. But his policies I generally agree with. I am also pleased with the hydrogen car initiaive.
Reply #73 Top
Might interest all to know that in the 1987 hearings O. North said that Osama Bin Ladin was the most Evil man in the world and should be assassinated. The Senator questioning him at the time, Al Gore, said that he never heard of him and that was ridiculous. In 1986 the Israelis arrested a fellow named Mohammad Atta who blew up a bus in Israel. The Israelis captured, tried and imprisoned him. As part of the Oslo agreement with the Palestinians in 1993, Israel had to agree to release so-called "political prisoners."
However, the Israelis would not release any with blood on their hands, The American President at the time, Bill Clinton, and his Secretary of State, Warren Christopher, "insisted" that all prisoners be released.
So much for the last great administration!


Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #74 Top
Wombat, are you suggesting that only those who are in the military have a right to decide whether a democracy has the right to provide military action? If so, I'm sure there is some third world country that would be happy to have you.

Or are you trying to suggest I'm a coward since I support military action but am not intending on shutting down Stardock, WinCustomize and blow off my other responsibilities to enlist in the military?

Frankly, I don't think I want you to hang out on this website.

Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #75 Top
btw George W. Bush has served in the military in the Air Force.

Powered by SkinBrowser!