From what I read UEFI Partitions the hard drive with 4 partitions automatically in GPT mode and then installs windows.
Well that's not my experience of things, not at all. When I was ready to install Windows on my SSD there was only one partition. From there, Win 8 created a "System Reserved" partition of 300mb, an EFI partition of 100mb, and the OS partition itself.
That means there is no MBR and you can't reparation and do a duel boot
A UEFI system does not need a Master Boot Record like Legacy BIOSes, instead it records the installed HDDs in the GPT file. However, this does not prevent dual booting should one wish to do so. I also read that dual booting wasn't possible in a UEFI environment, so I [partially] tried to install Ubuntu on my UEFI based AMD FX 3850 rig, just to see if I could. I ran the installation disc and got to select the partition I wanted to use, and then I clicked install, which it began to do without hinderance. I just didn't complete the installation because I didn't want to lose the rapid boot times I was achieving.
Also, I have a neighbour who dual boots Win 8 and Win XP Pro on his UEFI based machine, so it is possible. I just think there is way too much misinformation out there regarding UEFI and Windows 8, that people are possibly avoiding good and reliable systems on the basis of bullshit, for want of a better word/expression. For example, I have performed reparations/recoveries in the UEFI environment without issue, either with Acronis True image or the native Windows recovery process, so that's not true.
The article also said you have to have a specially formatted DVD to boot up from CD drive.
What? Really? I don't know what that even means... or where the idea came from. Unless they're talking really old hardware or some other issue from the Stone Age, that is totally rubbish. I can boot from my Windows 8 disc, and I don't know that it is specially formatted. I can boot from my Acronis recovery disc, and I didn't specially format that when I created it. And for good measure, I'm going to try a Win 98 disc and an XP disc in my other UEFI machine. Hang on! Yup, just as I expected! Both booted from disc. So that's not true, either..
I dunno, I sometimes wonder if this misinformation is blatant bullshit, and if so, how do these 'media types' get away with it against some of the most powerful tech companies in the world. Or alternatively, is it misguided opinion because the 'so-called' expert trusted to evaluate the tech had no clue what he/she was doing, therefore resulting in a completely unreliable review/assessment, whatever. In either event, it makes me angry that the 'misinformation is allowed to remain out there to be embellished upon by another string of experts with an axe to grind.
I will admit that I was a bit hesitant at first, not knowing much about UEFI, but in having used it in 3 systems over the last 12 months, I will safely and categorically say that there is absolutely nothing wrong with it [until I have a reason to bitch about it]. Nah, seriously, it's damn good tech when used properly/as intended and isn't feched up by an OEM. with an agenda to drive.
Hehe, couldn't help myself, could I? Had to wind up with a bit of a conspiracy theory, didn't I! Maybe, cos I loves a good conspiracy theory, and it's way past my bedtime, it'll help me to sleep better.
EDIT!!!
Oi, what business have you, posting in between me and my intended quotee, and then go insult my goofy BOIS in the preocess? You've been a naughty boy again, haven't you! Now you're to big to go over my knee fer a good whooping with grandma's best teatowel, not to mention too far away, so as punishment I'm gonna give you negative karma until the cows come home.
BTW, I'm pleased to see that you got it sorted.
See, with a bit of determination and a few cuss words, anything's possible.