Angel_Wings Angel_Wings

Cry babies

Cry babies

Yes, it’s true…I’m one of the few, the proud…the cry babies.

So listen to me now, hear me later and think about it sometime…

Artists, CAN be a bit oversensitive at times (at least the type that grew up like me…without any formal training and starting with crayola and working up to the big gurl/boy stuff like oils and acrylics, clay etc. and later trying to work their way through a computer version of their own style and attempting to make what feels so unnatural with a mouse look as if they actually had their hand in the dang thing).

I grew up using art as my emotional outlet because I didn’t really have any other outlet that served me as well (okay, poetry and singing were good too). Perhaps it’s true that wincustomize is more strictly a skin site rather than an artistry type of site but I’d sorely miss the wallpapers that are here and let’s put this in perspective for a wee moment shall we? Wallpaper can set the mood for your whole desktop environment so to discount it as mere “fluff” that should *only* compliment the skins which define your OS elements seems rather dissident and ignorant in my opinion. I love to see a sunset on my desktop…I love to see the night stars and a city at night…I even love (gawd forbid) dolphins and beaches and palm trees…oh my

Food for question…

Is “skinning” even an art? And if we stripped *every* artist and skinner here of every filter or program known to mankind and made them do it without anything at all but a pixel by pixel…would this site even exist? And if we judge everyone by the program they use…(i.e. Bryce, Photoshop etc.) then…is our digital art just a fanciful example of one’s skill at that program? Does being a *digital* artist as a whole make that art feel as if it’s without soul and without feeling? Without the fingerprint that gives an artist his/her style? I think that a program or filter does NOT make the artist…but rather enhances his/her abilities… I liken it to…traditional artists from days of yore who considered using prefab colors in paint a *no-no* and felt that creating one’s own colors from a pot of the basic 3 (i.e. yellow, red, blue) were the only true way of creating art. They also seriously frowned upon black and white as actual paint colors because those are considered *shades* and one should be disciplined enough not to need those as long as one is careful…

Almost every windowblinds skin “screams” KPT 5 shapeshifter…and I love that proggy too…but does that mean…you are cheating? I hope not! I think the beautiful stuff that people do with that is reason enough to use it!

Did I just go off on a tangent?

Sorry, just ingore this post and move on to important matters! )
12,562 views 80 replies
Reply #76 Top
As a TRUE ARTIST, I know that there is only one true form of artist: Painting on a canvas. Others are simply posers.

Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #77 Top
I consider my photography to be art. The camera is my brush, the film my canvas and the whole world my subject.

What is important is to create. How you get there is unimportant

Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #78 Top
Gee, did I miss pistols at dawn? It's certainly apparent I'm not trying to win any *popularity* contest here! ROTFLMAO!

Art…the definition seems elusive and I suppose some people might think their own nose goblin collection could be considered art (joking).

Hmm. Truth be told, I just enjoy ‘playing’ on my computer with my art programs and I think filters are so much fun to tinker with and I don’t take my desktop art or any of my art seriously (most all of my computer stuff which I’d never consider framing and actually hanging on a wall like my regular art)! I just don’t like how some (ahem) people get on such a high horse about their own techniques as if they are the ONLY TRUE WAY etc. and I don’t have a super-computer with mega RAM to spend hours on pixels and a 100 layers (geez, my computer would crash with 50 layers!!!) nor would I want to but if that were my career of choice it might seem justifiable but hey, …I’m not fooling myself and I ain’t quittin’ my day job (he-he)…for me it’s all just playing and learning and creating my own eye candy!

“Art” for me is just fun time whether it’s a relaxing chance to play with colors and images and whatever strikes my fancy, or writing or singing or dancing under a full moon. Nope, I’m not a digital “ARTEEST”…I’m just frolicking with a manic mouse and cursing at my cursor from time to time…

Time to have some FUN! FUN! FUN! (No time to grow up...must play with my crayons now)!

Hmm. I sure would have liked to see JamMeister33 use that "head lopper" though... (Better keep my head)!...

TTFN!
Reply #79 Top
My definition about art would be anything that is created beyond skill and knowledge. So you can only create art after being taught the skills. There are a lot of people that get to the point they perfect their skills, but can't get beyond that. For myself that's just the starting point. What you create has to be different, appealing or appalling, stir stuck brains etc. It doesn't matter what kind of material you use. Film, canvas, monitor...Anything.

Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #80 Top
dark_seraphim...

If you wish to check out a truly talented 'digital' artist, have a look at the work by Nuvem, either here or on DevART.

He combines vision, emotion and meaning along with a true mastery of the medium.
It was a truly sad day for mere mortals when he got a Wacom and moved on from the mouse.

And if that ain't enough to humble our efforts, he's adept at all the traditional [physical] media as well.
f he weren't a good friend I'd hate him for his talent....