Suggestion for LiteStep Theme Category

As a relative LS newbie, I think it would be great to branch off the LiteStep themes into "beginner" and "advanced" sections. In my opinion, "beginner" themes would be those that are relatively complete, with respect to how closely they emulate standard Windows functionality. In other words, as a newbie, it's going to take me awhile to figure out how to add a systray. With themes that already include one, I can learn by seeing what was already done. The "advanced" themes, though perhaps sometimes simpler in appearance, might take more work on the part of the user to become reasonably functional. Just a suggestion, as right now, I'm browsing through themes looking for those that provide the features I want "off the shelf". Having them separated like that would be a big help . . at least to me.
5,516 views 19 replies
Reply #1 Top
i wonder how that should be categorized. btw: i can´t imagine there is a theme without systray. which theme do you mean (link please, i am not going to browse the entire section)?
Reply #2 Top
I guess the problem is one more of having to tweak a theme to get the components to appear. For example: Cutter-Cogs, though pictured with a systray, didn't load one when I switched to that theme (https://www.wincustomize.com/window.asp?Cmd=PREVIEW&source=https://www.wincustomize.com/library/accounts/Jafo/litestep/Cutter-Cogs-theme2.jpg)
Reply #3 Top
Mark..
My mistake with the upload....it 'does' have one, but I omitted ckmousehooks.dll that needs to go in the LS directory for ckhotspots to work. [tasks and systray are 'hidden' by hotspots].

Shall amend the upload today...

It IS rare for a theme to not include a systray....even in the old days it would show up in the wharf.

What 'should' happen is a definite distinction between OTS-compliant themes and the 'rest'...[though that wouldn't help when twits like me leave out a dll]...
Reply #4 Top
Hey, thanks Jafo! I think I have a long way to go toward getting a real handle on LiteStep. IMO, part of what makes it a bit more difficult is that different authors don't "package" or structure their themes the same way. Of course, those with multiple styles make it even harder for someone learning what's going on. Now, what would *really* be cool, if there was a sort of standardized LiteStep "Control Panel", or something like SkinStudio for LiteStep. Anyway, thanks again. I'll be sure to grab your update, as Cutter-Cogs is really amazing!
Reply #5 Top
Mark...the idea behind 'OTS-compliant' themes IS that they are user-friendly, unlike the 'Good-old-days' when there was no 'standard' method for setting up a directory/theme structure.
I, like many others, used to package the ENTIRE shell as a theme, making it 'fairly' simple to re-configure to your own personal situation, but the themes were/are huge.....normally between 2 and 4 meg, rather than less than one meg, as the OTS ones tend to be...
Reply #6 Top
BTW...the 'amended' Cutter Cogs is up...[spam spam spam spam spam]....
Reply #7 Top
Yes, grabbed it, and got a tray thanks! I may have other issues, perhaps related to the most recent (yesterday) Indie LS build. It seems I save step.rc files, or even make changes via the LS theme app, and they are changed the next time I login. For example, with Cutter-Cogs, everything was working fine with it with the exception of the systray. Now, with the added dll, the tray is fine, but the images behind the popup are mysteriously gone. All I did was move the dll into the LS directory, I didn't update any other components of the theme. Anyway, LS is definitely a tweaker's paradise, that's for sure.
Reply #8 Top
Mark...if you have the 'Original' Cutter Cogs [with the grey wall], the coding changed quite a lot between that and the second version with the 'real' BoXXi wall....and it'd be probably better to replace the whole theme, not just add the dll.
First 'zip' was 'Cutter-Cogs-LS.zip' [grey wall]
Second 'Cutter-Cogs2-LS.zip' [Blue wall and coding alts]
Third [corrected dll] 'Cutter-Cogs2a-LS.zip'
If you 'only' use the third, things 'should' be fine..
Reply #10 Top
Glad to help...

It's a learning curve for me, too...this OTS stuff...but I'm well on the road to converting all of my existing themes, and enhancing their 'functionality' while I'm at it, just to see how limiting [or not] the OTS standard really is....
Reply #11 Top
Lately, I've been spending a lot of time with (and liking) SharpE as a shell. Odd in a way, because it's not very graphically intense, but it just works. LiteStep is great, but without a design interface tool of some kind, it's pretty intimidating. For example, a few (very few, it seems) themes have integrated the mail plugin. For those that don't have it, but are otherwise nice, creating a simple desktop "mail checker" seems to be a real project. I guess though, that's the appeal of LiteStep. It's fast considering how cool it can look, but the trade off is that it needs to be "hand crafted". FWIW, on DeskMod, I found "RhodiumEdge", and was amazed to find it absolutely "plug and play". One of the few. Anyway, the learning process continues, but at the end of the day, I usually find myself back in SharpE.
Reply #12 Top
Mark, with literally hundreds of plug-ins it´s quite clear that the mail checker plug-in is not integrated in every theme. here is an awesome skinnable freeware program for your needs: http://www.glabouni.com/EzPop/ all major skin sites (except WinCustomize) have a section for EzPop skins.
Reply #13 Top
Thanks! Good choice! In fact, I am already running EzPop! You're right, but having a cool plugin integrated into the theme is cool. EzPop certainly does a great job though.
Reply #14 Top
Mark: when i see your enthusiasm i am pretty sure you will soon be able to modify themes yourself for your personal taste and integrate the plug-ins you need. that´s one of the most fun parts in LiteStep.
Reply #15 Top
Yes...LiteSTEP is at its best as a D.I.Y. shell....the ability to customize it to exactly how YOU want it.
To a certain degree, publicly released themes 'can' be watered down when trying to cater for a wider 'audience'.
What you use on your own system is not necessarily what gets uploaded publicly...[in my case, my shell is too damn big to upload]...
Reply #16 Top
It certainly is fun, that's for sure. I am finding myself grabbing almost every theme in sight, and seeing which are the easiest to tweak. One thing I noticed with the 7/26 Indie build, is that when using the LSTS interface, "step.rc" files are coming up in the edit field as "sdtep.rc" or something like that. In other words, there's some corruption going on to both the path and name of the file. I didn't see this in earlier builds, so I may roll back or wait for a newer nightly. Without a doubt though, once a theme is up and running, they "feel" faster than any other shell scheme I've used.
Reply #17 Top
LiteSTEp IS [or can be] a lighter shell than Explorer.exe...which is the 'second' reason to use it...['customizing' being the first]...
Reply #18 Top
this has nothing to do with the IndieStep build. this is a little bug in LSTS and has been there before. it happens when there is no *thm file in the theme´s folder. just load LSTS, edit the settings of the theme and your done.
Reply #19 Top
Great, thanks again. That's what I've been doing, but didn't know why it happened . . until now. That's easy enough. BTW, I spent quite a bit of time tweaking BlackSteel RMX last night, and it looks great, and works well. Nice theme! I think I just want to eliminate the zoomer, but otherwise now, it's another of my few "almost totally working the way I want them to" themes.