mormegil mormegil

Apples New Ad Campaign? Bad Move?

Apples New Ad Campaign? Bad Move?

As someone who makes a living doing Graphic Design, on PC’s. I have always had a bit of angst toward the *Mac People* out there who think Macs are the only way to do anything creative.
However, I am a big fan of the tenacity of Steve Jobs. I Admire the fact that he is hell bent on making what he sees as the best computer he can make. And of late, at least since OS-X, or should I say NeXTstep reborn, I think that they have been making great systems. I would not go so far as to say the best, but very impressive. I have to give great praise to the creativity of design, and say it takes balls to just change standards whenever they get out dated.
That said, I have to gripes.

I am buying a new MAC G4 next month, not to replace my PC, just to go along with it. I like the BSD base of OSX and figure I can kill two birds with one stone and improve my knowledge base while I am at it. I think Mac and PC, can get along just fine, and that each has its strengths. This is costing me way more then A equivalent PC but I have been saving for a year, and I am going to do it anyway.

Now comes Apples New Ad campaign, which is amid at PC users. It almost lost the sale to This PC User when I first saw it. The Why I see it is This campaign will not attract any more PC users then before and will alienate the More Tech Savvy PC Users. (That they have been attracting for the last year with OS-X) The New adds seem to me to say, replace that crappy PC with a cool MAC. This insults anyone who likes there PC, I being one, and then try to sell the Mac on the on its Aesthetic appeal. No Facts are given. Tech Savvy PC Users what to know what makes the system better, not that it is “Not Windows”.

And my biggest gripe is that in all of that adds I have seen so far they make it a Black and White issue, They say quite using your PC throw it away and use a MAC. In my experience your average person doesn’t want to through away all they have learned and start over. That approach doesn’t seem to be a selling point. I use both, and soon will own both.

My question is:
As a largely PC community of Designers, Users, and Artist, do the new Apple ads piss you off or make you think of buying a Mac?

And Secondly, how may of you use both PC’s and Macs? And what do you think of the new Ads?
17,512 views 74 replies
Reply #26 Top
Indeed, IIRC, Steve Jobs just recently stated once again that there was absolutely NO CHANCE of an x86 version of OS X. ...and let's face it, it makes no sense for them to ever do so. Apple is primarily a hardware company and to release an x86 version of their OS would be suicide.


As far as ease of use goes, at least for the way I work, OS X is quite a bit more user friendly than OS 9 and earlier. The only reason OS 9 seems more user friendly is because the UI hasn't changed all that much in ages, imo.

I'd also rate the OS X UI as being far above XP where productivity is involved, once again at least for the way I work. OS X seems to 'get out of the way' and let me do my thing where XP feels like it's always trying to get up in my face.
Reply #27 Top
What I find funny about the ads is that they're all "creative" people: an artist, a writter, etc.
How can that ad actually work? Most people don't relate to the creative thinkers, they just think they're weird. And the creative workers mostly already have a Mac.

So, to me, this ad campain isn't about getting new customers, but trying not to lose the existing ones.
Reply #28 Top
Actually, they're not all creative people: a Windows LAN Admin, one claims to be a programmer, I think another is an IT manager or business consultant.


Of course, I don't see any 16 yo's talking about how they IM their friends from an iBook while handling the Drive-Thru window at Wendy's.


Maybe that will be in the next wave of ads.
Reply #29 Top
Didn't see those. Only saw the artist and the writter (I think I saw 3, 2 of them were writers of some sort).

A Windows LAN Admin buing a Mac? Yeah, right.
But yes, I did know a Mac programer once. Of course, he had to use a PC at work, and he always complained about it.
Reply #30 Top
actually paxx, i've met windows admins who've opted for macs at home one for example was an nt network admin in a state gov't division. he always talked about how he loved to go home and work -with- the computer instead of working -on- the computer.

as i said though, i use and like both. i tend to feel about this alot like jtfolden does, though. i guess my whole thing in all this is just trying to be inclusive rather than devisive. computer gui modification is a small enough niche as it is
Reply #31 Top
I remember the first computer I used at home. I checked it out for 30 days at a time. It was a portable. Weighed about 30 pounds. Had a 4in screen, 2 floppy drives, no hard drive and I think 256 ram. I thought it was great. It was an IBM.
Reply #32 Top
For the record, my first experience with computers was on a Mac. For 7 years. Until 1995.
Reply #33 Top
My first experience was with a VIC-20. hehe
Reply #34 Top
i remember when the 8th grade math teacher got the first computer at the school. i was in 6th grade, and i asked what kind it was - an ibm? a dec? maybe a burroughs? "no, an apple." i said what's that? i never heard of it. too bad they didn't get a real computer..

of course, at the time the -only- personal computer that you didn't get in a kit was the apple ][

hehe
Reply #35 Top
I still have every computer I have ever owned....they are:

VIC-20 - Great first computer
C-64 - Unending hours typing in code listings from Compute magazine...anyone remember that one?
Tandy Color Computer(coco) - 16K RAM, single (external - metal case) 160K 5.25 floppy
Tandy 1000 - 64K RAM, dual internal 320K floppies and a 300baud modem....impressive, huh?
Tandy Laptop - 640K RAM, dual internal 3.5 floppies...never thought thosse would last....go figure
Tandy 3000 - 640K, 10MB hard drive - how could I ever fill that up?....wooohoooo
Clone 386-16Mhz - (Actually the first one was stolen from me and eventually replaced with a 33Mhz version)
Zenon 486-50Mhz - True 50Mhz motherboard
Clone Pentium 90Mhz - now were talking!!!
Clone P3-400
Clone P3-450
Dell Inspiron 7500 laptop (P3 - 600Mhz)

There's also an early MAC that someone gave me....but I never even plugged it in.

They all still work....I break out the C64 to play games from time to time...for nostalgic reasons mainly.

Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #36 Top
I too am lusting after one of the new Imacs. I have to confess... yes, they look sexy. But I'm also one of those people who sees beauty in PCs and Macs. Heh, until a couple of years ago we used an Amiga.

But now in our new apartment with so much more room and with all my stuff finally set up on the main PC in the house, I finally feel it's safe to take the plunge with a Mac.

I guess it's the PC user in me that I don't feel safe unless there's a pc nearby. But I believe that the two ways of computing compliment each other nicely.

I guess it's just nice to have that change of scenery.
Reply #37 Top
Peff...re the endless hours typing on a C64....yep, sure do...[shudder]...
Reply #38 Top
Hehe...i am actually looking at one of those ads right now, and was just wondering when MS is going to take action towards some of the claims. The ad that I am looking at is in Time Magazine. It shows a picture of a guy, then on the other page is a screenshot of an email to switchers at apple.com titled "It just works". It is supposedly from a LAN admin who switched to a MAC because it "just works" unlike the PCs that are a "constant struggle" to keep running. Underneath the email, it says "Aaron Adams wanted a computer that "just works", unlike the PCs he's paid to fix all day." Hmmmm...I find that slamming your competition in an ad doesn't sell your product. Maybe he's just a bad admin and set the PCs up poorly? Hard to say. But, as a PC owner, that didn't make me want to buy an Apple.
Reply #39 Top
TI 1000 2k + 16k ram cartrige
Vic 20
C64 and 128
IBM PC JR
8088 clone
386
486 66 with 16MB RAM
P100 with 32MB
P200 with 128MB
Celeron 433 with 256MB
current Dual PIII 500 256MB Ram

WE have come a long way in a very short time and yes I remember the many limes of code typed into some of the early ones....

As far as os's go I've used every MS os since Windows 2 through XP pro with the exception of Melinium, Linux under KDE, and about 5 minutes worth of MacOS ( everything felt wrong handed at the time) Oh and of course GEOS on the C64/128 and powerdesk on the early PCs

Would I buy a MAC? No the current Price tags are too high for my liking.
Reply #40 Top
You didn't miss much by skipping WinME
Reply #41 Top
KarmaGirl, if you're happy with your Wintel PC then that's why the ads don't appeal to you. Apple seems to be specifically targeting people who are unhappy with their current systems - and there are a lot of those people.

I know a teacher who saw one of the ads on TV over the weekend. She knows I use Macs now and called to ask me if she should 'switch'.

I more or less made the 'switch' around 15 months ago myself and couldn't be happier. The only Windows PC that runs in my house now is a "Virtual" one via VirtualPC.
Reply #42 Top
Hay, can you run DesktopX on your VortialPC?
Reply #43 Top
man i didnt like macs to begin with but i did somewhat respect the name brand... but these ads make them look like name calling children...(just my 2 cents)
Reply #44 Top
Even if I liked Mac computers, I could never bring myself to buy all over again all the software I have! Must have more software worth than the hardware worth. Yikes!

Again, if only all OSes were 100% compatible, then we'd have a fair fight, and may the better win.
Reply #45 Top
I've used Macs and I don't like them. My FIL has been using Macs for years, and even though he complains about them all the time, he claims that they are better than a PC (even though he doesn't use PCs). I don't like them, but I have no problem with them or other people being fans of them. i do, however, have a problem with companies slamming other companies to try and make themselves look better. All computers have their own issues- they are just different issues.
Reply #46 Top
I just could never get used to the single mouse button after using a 2 or 3 button PC mouse.

Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #47 Top
mormegil: I actually haven't tried DesktopX under VPC, but WindowBlinds, ObjectBar, etc... all run fine here.

KarmaGirl: I agree, all computers have issues. IMO, however, a recent Mac running OS X 10.1 generally seems to have less issues than a comparable PC running Windows. Probably due to the fact that the hardware and OS were literally made for each other. I've had virtually no problems with my 3 OS X based macs during the last year: not one crash of any sort, no lock-ups... I got one Kernel Trap back in April 2001 that I was able to reboot my way out of... Any Mac OS before X is an entirely new ball of wax, however. I think they're just as troublesome as the average Wintel PC due to all the baggage that got added over the years.

Peff: I love my single-button mouse so much that it stays in the box my Mac was shipped in.

I'm using a Logitech Cordless here, actually.
Reply #48 Top
Yeah, all the Mac users at work use a Logitech 2 button mouse. Too bad the wheel isn't supported though.

About OSX, I don't doubt its stability. But previous Mac OSes were just as flaky if not more than its Windows counterpart. Seems both PC and Mac now have a stable plateform to work with. Never had a crash with XP on any of the 2 machines I use it with. So I must admit, I don't feel compeled to change whasoever, and according to statistics, not many people do.
Last stat I read, there were more Linux/Unix/BSD users than Mac users (something like 6% against 5%). But that was about one year ago, it might have changed a bit since then. The Linux craze seems to be slowing down.
Reply #49 Top
Hmm, the wheel is natively supported under OS X, and I have the Logitech driver installed under OS9 and it works ok there (granted, I rarely boot back into 9 so how good it works I have no idea).

I really don't like XP. I thought NT4 and Win2k were great but the UI in XP is just a mess, IMO, and I don't really see any other major benefits.

Well, if you're lumping all the *nix's together, I guess you'd have to throw OS X in there, as well. I've never much cared for who uses what, though. I constantly seem to be using minority platforms (DESQview/X, OS/2, OPENSTEP, etc...) I just care about what works best for me.
Reply #50 Top
Just a matter of taste, jtf.
I personnaly never cared for the Aqua look.

BTW: what programs do you use? At work, they have OSX beta installed but they never boot into it because their apps don't support OSX.
They mostly use Photoshop 6, Illustrator 9 and Quark Xpress.
Yes, they just bought PS7 and AI10 which support X, but Quark still doesn't and they keep switching back and forth between PS, AI and QX, so until Quark supports OSX, it's oput of the question for a lot of publication artists.
Of course, it'll come in time.