And they shall inherit the community
from
WinCustomize Forums
To a newcomer, probably nothing is as melodramatic as the regular discussion of "community". To a newcomer, it's all a matter of taking what is ultimately a hobby way too seriously.
But on the other hand, I would also argue that of all the zillions of virtual communities out there, the customization (or "Skin") community has had a lot of impact which I would credit to its blend of grass roots and commercial strengths combining (grass roots strength with commercial marketing to bring that grass roots movement to the attention of the mainstream).
l0c elsewhere made a post wondering whether we were at a fork in the road. Where on the one hand you would have the people who see skinning at "Art" and the "hackers" who like to create and edit things with resource hackers on the other side of the fork. That two distinct communities would emerge.
I don't agree with that distinction. I think there is only 1 community broken up into niches. There are the people who see computers as more than just a means to an end. And many of those people want to have the ability to customize their computers to suit their unique and specific needs. That's the foundation of skinning.
Stardock's goal has been to allow as many people as possible into that world as possible. To provide so many different options to those people that it could make a business model out of it - Object Desktop. The more people who are part of our community, the better.
However, there are two sides of the coin. There, I think, those that would like to see things as a more intimate community where the casual users are kept out and it's just a core group of expert users who set the tone and direction of customization.
What are your thoughts? Do you see customization as being eventually mainstream where most people are using a combination of what's built in and third party solutions to control their OS or are we at a high point now and that it'll soon return to being where people are happy with whatever's built into the OS and everything else is marginalized to the hackers and super tweakers?
But on the other hand, I would also argue that of all the zillions of virtual communities out there, the customization (or "Skin") community has had a lot of impact which I would credit to its blend of grass roots and commercial strengths combining (grass roots strength with commercial marketing to bring that grass roots movement to the attention of the mainstream).
l0c elsewhere made a post wondering whether we were at a fork in the road. Where on the one hand you would have the people who see skinning at "Art" and the "hackers" who like to create and edit things with resource hackers on the other side of the fork. That two distinct communities would emerge.
I don't agree with that distinction. I think there is only 1 community broken up into niches. There are the people who see computers as more than just a means to an end. And many of those people want to have the ability to customize their computers to suit their unique and specific needs. That's the foundation of skinning.
Stardock's goal has been to allow as many people as possible into that world as possible. To provide so many different options to those people that it could make a business model out of it - Object Desktop. The more people who are part of our community, the better.
However, there are two sides of the coin. There, I think, those that would like to see things as a more intimate community where the casual users are kept out and it's just a core group of expert users who set the tone and direction of customization.
What are your thoughts? Do you see customization as being eventually mainstream where most people are using a combination of what's built in and third party solutions to control their OS or are we at a high point now and that it'll soon return to being where people are happy with whatever's built into the OS and everything else is marginalized to the hackers and super tweakers?

