I beat the 'bastards' again.
The Archie's nemesis ... the Planner.
Architects don't just "draw stuff", they need to be able to get all 'political' and argue interpretations too.
It's a dodgey game as you're dealing with people who can [like to] make or break your day.... you have to be oh-so polite and 'reasonable', yet state in a way they don't realize...."you're just plain wrong" and get them to reverse their decision/requirement/amendment.
Last week I received an in-house-issued Planning Permit for 2 units...on a single, corner block...about 50 feet wide by about 130 long.
Now, by definition a FRONTAGE is the 50 bit of road facing North...and the 130 is the SIDE road [East].
Hassle was...it was a corner in the SAME road...so not 2 different names which may have eliminated [their] confusion.
I designed a PAIR of units...facing the SIDE street boundary.
Clever Planning Dept. determined/declared that since BOTH units had their front doors on that side...THAT was thus the FRONT of the site.
Wrong. The piece of land did not move....the Front is STILL the short bit facing North...not the long bit facing East.
What got their knickers in a knot is that the 'rear' unit DOES face the side street [East] and NOW will exist as a separate ratable entity so it DOES need to comply with the [3000] setback rule, however, although the front one is IDENTICAL [mirrored] it is still the FRONT one....[hence its name....with me still? ] and thus its front is yes, you guessed it...the FRONT of the site... and that means the SIDE [with a front door in it] only is required to be 2000 setback as is the case with a SIDE street.