If I had any input on that subject, I promise I'll seek out one of your articles on issues of importance to gays. No need to seek out responses elsewhere. BTW I could care less what you or anyone else to do in private, wear it out if you like, just don't expect me to call it marriage, it doesn't meet my non-religious definition. I sure your thinking is more in line with Vermont's, everyone with a different opinion is ignorant. That's your choice. It is not yet the liberal socialist utopia so we still free to have our own thoughts for now.
End of quote
A utopia will never work, it's impossible. Besides, I never claimed nor implied a desire for a utopia of any kind. All I aim for, (every day) with the activism that I am involved in is the push of our founding principles. Essentially - The god damn universal right to life, liberty, and happiness (as well as our bill of rights), for everyone - religious beliefs, ethical dilemmas be damned.
What matters in our country, is our principles - not the eroding of such.
Americans - no matter who they are - have the natural right to live their life as they see fit, and to tell others who want to force their beliefs on them - to fuck off. It's sad, in my opinion, that many people are so driven by ignorance, religious blindness, heterosexism, that they are not willing to let others live as they see fit.
If only the shoes where switched, then maybe people would get the point.
You're the ignorant one Lucas, always pushing your gay agenda where ever you can, but again it's all about you, right?
End of quote
So equality under the law is ignorance and a gay agenda? Nitro, you drink way too much of that kool aid. The government's obligation to recognize all of its citizens as equals under the law - is not equal to cultural acceptance. Just look at other things our government does that isn't accepted by most people.
It's a matter of law and principle.
Whose obsessing about gays and also I offered no theory (What college do you attend again?) You mentioned homosexuals in the first place (see how difficult it is to "turn it off" when it is thrown in your face in topics that are unrelated, so much for getting off ones ass, no pun intended).
End of quote
First off, Nitro, I brought it up to prove a point - i.e. the "good intentions" that you support. Ironically given that you've repeatedly said that good intentions don't mean much. I guess that's only for liberals right? Secondly, the term theory was used to convey sarcasm - i do apologize for not putting quotes around that, given the failure of the written to word to sometimes convey points made. Thirdly, quit being a dumbass. Aside from being a parapalegic, you can turn off a television or ignore what someone says. Come on Nitro, accept the accountability that comes with watching something you don't agree with, or replying to another individual's post.
~Alderic
JoeUser Forums
