Are these WB versions correct?

hmmm

May 30, 2009 3:06 PM from

WinCustomize Forums

Having a little issue with a customer on my site, loggoff buttons not showing correctly in Vista apprently on the Naked Noir skin.

Are these correct, updated, purchased versions?

Your computer has a Windows Experience Index base score of 5.9
Your Windows Graphics Experience score is 5.9

WindowBlinds version : WindowBlinds 6.4 (build 123 x86 - Vista Edition) - 64 bit OS

WindowBlinds is installed correctly on this PC
WindowBlinds appears to be activated on this PC
(SyncMaster 933SN/SN1933/933SNPlus) 1 is attached to ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series

Wblind.dll 2009/02/06 13:16:20
Wblind64.dll 2009/02/06 13:16:31
Wbsrv.dll 2009/02/05 13:39:31
Wbconfig.exe 2009/02/10 13:13:20
Wbload.exe 2008/04/26 15:14:14
Wbhelp.dll 2008/04/26 15:14:07
Tray.dll 2008/04/26 15:14:21
Wbload.dll 2008/04/26 15:14:28
Screen.exe 2008/07/15 10:31:09

http://www.maxstyles.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1927.last

Hopefully someone can help me sort it out, no one else has had the issue.

Thanks.

6,183 views 27 replies

Reply #1 May 30, 2009 3:18 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

The same happens to me when I change the font size (dpi) under 'appearance' in windows. If You set it bigger than the standard 96 dpi, the standard Vista buttons appear. Old WB problem. As my XPS laptop has 1920 resolution, I have to set the fonts bigger, so this is quite normal to me there.

Reply #2 May 30, 2009 3:21 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

But its not happening in other skins apparently..

CursorFX - Customize your Windows cursor

Reply #3 May 30, 2009 3:24 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

v....probably a question for the mods/jafo/i.d./stardock....

mine's:

Your computer has a Windows Experience Index base score of 3.1
Your Windows Graphics Experience score is 3.1

WindowBlinds version : WindowBlinds 6.4 (build 129 x86 - Vista Edition)

WindowBlinds is installed correctly on this PC
WindowBlinds appears to be activated on this PC
(Generic PnP Monitor) 1 is attached to NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS

Wblind.dll 2009/03/24 13:59:20
Wbsrv.dll 2009/03/24 17:03:02
Wbconfig.exe 2009/03/24 17:04:20
Wbload.exe 2009/03/24 17:04:14
Wbhelp.dll 2009/03/24 17:04:07
Tray.dll 2009/03/24 17:04:21
Wbload.dll 2009/03/24 11:40:25
Screen.exe 2009/03/24 17:04:09

after updating thru Impulse last week.

I'd suggest the person update through Impulse....then get the sysinfo again. If he/she can't update thru Impulse, might mean something...

Hope the rain stopped.

Reply #4 May 30, 2009 3:27 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

He could have had luck with the leo skin as it uses only slightly changed Vista standard buttons. I suppose, they are the same size as the original ones...

Reply #5 May 30, 2009 4:53 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

If it helps, mine is newer than that.

I sure you've asked but, do they have "show pre-released checked"?

Haven't picked up your WB yet so I can't comment on that part.

Your computer has a Windows Experience Index base score of 5.9
Your Windows Graphics Experience score is 5.9

WindowBlinds version : WindowBlinds 6.4 (build 129 x86 - Vista Edition) - 64 bit OS

WindowBlinds is installed correctly on this PC
WindowBlinds appears to be activated on this PC
(Generic PnP Monitor) 1 is attached to NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS

Wblind.dll     2009/03/24 13:59:20
Wblind64.dll     2009/03/24 17:03:54
Wbsrv.dll     2009/03/24 17:03:31
Wbconfig.exe     2009/02/10 17:52:20
Wbload.exe     2008/04/28 12:35:14
Wbhelp.dll     2008/04/28 12:35:07
Tray.dll          2008/04/28 12:35:21
Wbload.dll          2008/12/15 16:07:26
Screen.exe     2008/07/22 11:10:09

Reply #6 May 30, 2009 5:14 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

Naked works perfectly with my version, v.

Reply #7 May 30, 2009 5:24 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

I'm going to agree it is a dpi issue.

It will cause these problems. Never know without duplicating the issue on another machine.

Reply #8 May 30, 2009 5:32 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

I picked it up and I seem to have a problem with both vista versions. XP version is fine.

Edit: I'm running the default 96 DPI for font size

I really like the skin, my complements. If you need a tester while fixing it, let me know.

Vista

Reply #9 May 30, 2009 6:46 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

Weird mine has different numbers and I'm updated. Which is correct?

Your computer has a Windows Experience Index base score of 5.1
Your Windows Graphics Experience score is 5.1

WindowBlinds version : WindowBlinds 6.4 (build 129 x86 - Vista Edition)

WindowBlinds is installed correctly on this PC
WindowBlinds appears to be activated on this PC
(HP w2408 Wide LCD Monitor) 1 is attached to Radeon X1700 SE

Wblind.dll     2009/03/24 13:59:20
Wbsrv.dll     2009/03/24 17:03:02
Wbconfig.exe     2009/02/10 18:28:20
Wbload.exe     2008/04/28 11:35:14
Wbhelp.dll     2008/04/28 11:35:07
Tray.dll          2008/04/28 11:35:21
Wbload.dll          2009/03/24 11:40:25
Screen.exe     2008/06/13 11:24:09

Reply #10 May 30, 2009 6:56 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

How does Doc have all 2009 dates when the one's shown above still have a 2008 date?

I smell something fishy

Reply #11 May 30, 2009 7:00 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

I picked it up and I seem to have a problem with both vista versions. XP version is fine.

End of quote

You show two screenshots, one saying Vista and one saying XP, yet the XP screenshot looks exactly like Vista. Are you sure those are right CarGuy1?

Reply #12 May 30, 2009 7:38 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

Quoting ALMonty, reply 10

How does Doc have all 2009 dates when the one's shown above still have a 2008 date?

I smell something fishy

End of ALMonty's quote

AL...I just copied and pasted. I don't begin to understand why it's that way. Updated thru Impulse...what can I tell you? Do your laundry on time, ya little monkey!

Reply #13 May 30, 2009 7:57 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

I don't begin to understand why it's that way. Updated thru Impulse

End of quote

One is 32 bit and the other is 64 bit. ??

Reply #14 May 30, 2009 8:16 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

Lightstar, there's a missing shut down button on the Vista SS.

Since the original post mentioned a problem with the logoff buttons in Vista, I didn't see the need to point it out.

Reply #15 May 30, 2009 8:28 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

Quoting Night, reply 13

I don't begin to understand why it's that way. Updated thru Impulse

One is 32 bit and the other is 64 bit. ??

End of Night's quote

Yep....my OS is 2 bit (pun...?).

Reply #16 May 30, 2009 8:28 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

Lightstar, there's a missing shut down button on the Vista SS.

End of quote

I know that CarGuy1, I meant the screenshot that you have listed as XP appears to be a Vista screenshot also.

Reply #17 May 30, 2009 8:33 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

Funny, I just checked my 32-bit XP Home, and ALL the dates on ALL the files for WB are March 24, 2009, something is really weird here. Seems like WB cannot update itself correctly.

Reply #18 May 30, 2009 8:37 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

I know that CarGuy1, I meant the screenshot that you have listed as XP appears to be a Vista screenshot also.

End of quote

It's the XP version of the WB running on Vista. The do look close, tho.

Reply #19 May 30, 2009 9:04 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

Do your laundry on time

End of quote

That's not where the fishy smell is coming from.

My laptop has basically the same dates as my desktop (32bit). I haven't seen a WB update in a while.

Your computer has a Windows Experience Index base score of 3
Your Windows Graphics Experience score is 3

WindowBlinds version : WindowBlinds 6.4 (build 129 x86 - Vista Edition)

WindowBlinds is installed correctly on this PC
WindowBlinds appears to be activated on this PC
(Generic PnP Monitor) 1 is attached to NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS

Even with those dates both Naked's work fine for me.

Reply #20 May 30, 2009 9:18 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

I just did an install of Impulse and WB on Vista 32-bit and get:

Your computer has a Windows Experience Index base score of 3.1
Your Windows Graphics Experience score is 3.1

WindowBlinds version : WindowBlinds 6.4 (build 129 x86 - Vista Edition)

WindowBlinds is installed correctly on this PC
WindowBlinds appears to be activated on this PC
(Generic PnP Monitor) 1 is attached to Mobile Intel(R) 965 Express Chipset Family

Wblind.dll     2009/03/24 13:59:20
Wbsrv.dll     2009/03/24 17:03:02
Wbconfig.exe     2009/03/24 17:04:20
Wbload.exe     2009/03/24 17:04:14
Wbhelp.dll     2009/03/24 17:04:07
Tray.dll          2009/03/24 17:04:21
Wbload.dll          2008/04/28 12:34:28
Screen.exe     2009/03/24 17:04:09

Which is different even than what others are getting, wild!

Reply #21 May 30, 2009 9:20 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

It's the XP version of the WB running on Vista. The do look close, tho.

End of quote

Wow, if that's the XP version running on Vista, it looks good!

Reply #22 May 30, 2009 9:31 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

Just to show how different. This my TouchSmart laptop (I keep as backup) it's 64bit. The Wbload is the oldest one.

Your computer has a Windows Experience Index base score of 4
Your Windows Graphics Experience score is 4.3

WindowBlinds version : WindowBlinds 6.4 (build 129 x86 - Vista Edition) - 64 bit OS

WindowBlinds is installed correctly on this PC
WindowBlinds appears to be activated on this PC
(Generic PnP Monitor) 1 is attached to ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics

Wblind.dll     2009/03/24 13:59:20
Wblind64.dll     2009/03/24 17:03:54
Wbsrv.dll     2009/03/24 17:03:31
Wbconfig.exe     2009/02/10 17:52:20
Wbload.exe     2009/03/24 17:04:14
Wbhelp.dll     2009/03/24 17:04:07
Tray.dll          2009/03/24 17:04:21
Wbload.dll          2008/04/28 12:34:28
Screen.exe     2009/03/24 17:04:09

Reply #23 May 30, 2009 9:41 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

Funny, I just checked my 32-bit XP Home, and ALL the dates on ALL the files for WB are March 24, 2009, something is really weird here.

End of quote

Not really, the 2 OSes in question before were Vista x64 and x86..... your sys info is for XP and therefore is likely to be different again. Still, it doesn't explain why there are 2008 dates in any OS when WB has received a few updates in 09. One would think that all the important files had been updated and thus would carry an 09 date... but what would I know, am and pm confuses me... and most Sundays are actually Mondays or Tuesdays.

Reply #24 May 30, 2009 9:58 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

My laptop has basically the same dates as my desktop (32bit). I haven't seen a WB update in a while.

End of quote

Which is different even than what others are getting, wild!

End of quote

They like me more than you. The only explanation which makes sense.

Or maybe me m8 starkers is talking to us from the future, where he's already learned the answers.

Any racing/stock market or sporting event results you want to share with your mates?

Reply #25 May 30, 2009 10:01 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

Doesnt make any sense to me... how can a WB work fine on dozens of pc's, including my own.. and be screwed up on a few.

Maybe Neil will pop in with some insight.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting and posting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!