The differences between Protestantism and Catholicism

You better have real knowledge because JU has some LDS. So be sure to have good sources and such. Your work will be checked.

I'm no scholar, either, but let me outline the differences between the color red and the color blue.

Red is considered a warm hue, while blue is considered a blue hue.
Red is the first color in the rainbow, while blue is the third to last.
Red includes shades like Brazilian Flame and Burgundy while blue includes shades like Turquoise and Robin's Egg Blue.

There are some similarities, however.

Red and blue are both primary colors (unlike ORANGE!).
Red and blue can combine to make purple (but NOT orange!).
Red and blue are colors most often used on children's toys.

I will write more on orange later, since I do know a lot about it! More than I know about blue.

~Zoo

Umm... KFC and Lula keep posting about how Lula's bible has more books in it than KFCs. So I don't think you're right here.



Brilliant!

The Catholics keep a little more of the original church's writings too, but not like the Book of Mormon adds on the equivalent of video-game expansion packs. I can read the Book of Mormon, I've found it online before. Or I could find one that one of my relatives left around here.

GAH! I went on a new anti-biotic today, for my skin. Warnings included: Makes skin sensitive to sunlight. Not bad, huh? I tingle.

I'll be interested to see your mindless drivel version of Mormonism, if only to nail your ridiculous, ignorant assumptions to the wall.

You're fun, because you try to act like an authority while either 1)repeating tired, empty arguments or 2)saying nothing of substance at all.

At least it amuses me.

That's why I've always turned to you, Tex, for all my colour related questions. Your insights on colour are as profound and deeply moving as Erathoniel's on religion.

Do I have to put the no digital high-fiving on every article? If you don't have anything of true value, don't say it.

How do you excuse the original article?

Hmm...  



   *high-five*

~Zoo

Not funny. It just drowns out the useful comments. Seriously. I will disable or delete comments if I need to. I'm fine with hearing multiple opinions, but don't just continue stating the same thing without bringing anything to the table. It's like telling the same story directly after another person tells it.

Oh, and, so ya' know, the Christianity and Mormonism comparison is up.

That's absolutely your perogative. It's your blog!

But I thought it was funny.

Now, I'll tell you why.

We have a resident protestant and a resident catholic and they go back and forth about the differences between the two all the time, usually seeing the same point but arriving at it in different ways. There are major disagreements in doctrine, usually when referring to something that KFC believes is outside of scripture that Lula thinks is Catholic and therefore infallible. They post ridiculously well thought-out, scripturally researched opinions, that are often ridiculously long as well, when they have these disagreements. This leaves your six sentences (shorter than most of their comments) looking a little laughable in comparison. They might turn up later and post some of them. I hope so, that would be some good discussion.

Noted. Seriously, though, the Pope is a great religious figure, but the Bible ended at about A.D. 100 in terms of new content. It's still relevant, mind you.

I disagree. The Pope is there to distract people from Jesus.

Following that logic, so's your blessed pastor.

That depends on how Catholic you are. For someone who really believes, the infallibility of the pope makes him so close to Jesus as to mean no real difference barring divinity.

The Pope is a good religious figure, set up with all good intentions. It can go awry at times, though.

How do you come to that conclusion?

Both Protestantism and Catholicism are religious systems.

Let's start by examining those.

One of the most obvious differences between Catholicism and Protestantism is our beginnings....the Catholic faith and Church are both established by Christ who gave her His authority and sent her on her mission to make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe ALL that He had commanded and that He would be with her until the end of the world. After being filled with the Holy Spirit on the First Pentecost Day in 33AD, the Church, went out to all nations (read Acts)..and has been fulfilling her Divine mission ever since.

Everything that is peculiar to Protestantism started 16 centuries later. There is no such thing as the Protestant faith...yet their are hundreds of varieties each containing some true things mixed up with it own particular errors depending upon the founder.

As a religious system, I believe all Protestant sects are on the wrong path. I call Protestantism "Easy-Street" religion. After 16 centuries of practicing one faith, one baptism, one body throughout Christendom, the Reformers developed a new startling plan for salvation: there is only one requirement...believing that God has already pardoned all our sins...one who believes is a "believer"...he believes in Christ and is therefore "saved"...saved by his confidence. This Luther labeled "faith" and called his new system of salvation by "faith alone", Sola Fides.

Protestantism disobeys Christ. To bring about his new system of "faith alone", Luther came up with the other pillar of Protestantism, Sola Scripura. In general, it says that Scripture alone, the Holy Bible alone, is the only sufficient guide to salvation, although Scripture itself says that it is not. Belief in Sola Scriptura has resulted in the denial of the Church as well as the teaching authority in faith and morals of the Church both established by Christ....Protestantism has no Holy Mass, doesn't believe in Confession (Penance), Holy Orders, that Baptsim is necessary for salvation, and rejects Purgatory; and some the Blessed Trinity. It's advocates are all over the place in belief in the four last things, death, judgment, heaven, and hell. I could go on. The point is if you give me any doctrine taught by one Protestant Church, I'll produce another Protestant Church that denies it, save perhaps that there is a one true God and the Virgin Birth.

Some may say that Protestantism is not a protest against Christ, but against the Catholic Church, but that doesn't hold water. Christ promised that His Church would not fail..the Protestant Reformers said that it did. Instead of rightfully protesting agasint the bad lives of some Catholics, including priests, they went too far and revolted against the Chruch as such, asserting that Christ had failed to keep His promise concerning it. This was a revolt against Christ who had promised to be with His Church until the end of the world. Protest as much as you like against individuals abuses in the Church (and I do that plenty), but no one has the right to set up a new Church.