Reply #1 from PolMach Forums Top
What the hell only have three choices for President, come on! Nader is only on a ballot in 39 states while Badnarik is in 48 and I AM VOTING!

- GX, un-proud member of INGSOC
Reply #2 from PolMach Forums Top
This poll was actually taken from Michael Savage's website. Thus the reason why Bush is winning by a landslide and no Badnarik.
Offworld Trading Company
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top
*laugh* Michael Savage having a poll on his site makes as much sense as Michael Moore having one on his. At least it's something fun to click on.
Reply #4 from PolMach Forums Top
Damn! Did anyone see the numbers in "who won the debate"? What a poignant illustration of denial. I wonder how many of those that clicked on "Bush" would actually be able to stand up in a room full of people and honestly say their candidate won the debate. What a crock!
Reply #5 from PolMach Forums Top
What a poignant illustration of denial.


I guess that's one of the characteristics of being conservative. Another is senility, tell them they're wrong and they attack back angrily and pretend to have "facts" when instead it's another person's opinion or slander.
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top
tell them they're wrong and they attack back angrily and pretend to have "facts" when instead it's another person's opinion or slander


Now, now, I'm as liberal as they come, but you've got to admit that the left does their fair (unfair?) share of this.
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
Well, in all fairness, the percentage who say they're voting for Bush is significantly higher than the percentage who say Bush won the debate, which means that a chunk of the respondents are upfront about the debate outcome.
Reply #8 from PolMach Forums Top
the percentage who say they're voting for Bush is significantly higher than the percentage who say Bush won the debate


yea, at least 3% of them can tell the truth.

you've got to admit that the left does their fair (unfair?) share of this.


true.