Marvin Cooley Marvin Cooley

DEMOCRATIC SUPPORT OF PEDOPHILIA

DEMOCRATIC SUPPORT OF PEDOPHILIA

Recently there was a legislative hearing held in Sacramento, California. The hearing involved the fact that California State University-Northridge had sponsored The World Pornography Conference in Los Angeles. Democrats seemed to be pro-porn as they defended the liberal university. Like Bill Clinton, California Democrats have been major beneficiaries of the porn industries money and have not been the least queasy about rubbing elbows with the Hollywood pornographers and the radical fagot lobby. Democrats have allowed the San Fernando Valley to become the world capital of porn video production. Federal prosecution of pornography offenses, such as interstate commerce and postal crimes, have taken a steep dive in California.

The illegal use of university funds, personnel, equipment, and resources to promote a porno conference was only one of the factors that made Republican politicians angry. What put them over the top was the revelation of the prominence of notorious pedophile/pederast/child porn advocates and defenders at the universities event. Ralph Underwager is a pedophile supporter. Underwager, who masquerades as a Lutheran pastor, is the founder of the Institute for Man-Boy sex in Northfield, Minnesota.

The legislative committee was particularly disturbed by the obscene statement delivered by Underwager. Dr. Judith Reisman, author of the important study Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences, presented documentation showing that the gathering was a full-fledged pedophile confab.

Dr. Vern L. Bullough, a self-admitted pedophile, is the universities Sex Research Guru. Bullough wrote the introduction to the pedophile handbook Loving Boys: A Multidisciplinary Study in Two Volumes of Sexual Relations Between Adults and Children, by the Dutch pedophile, Dr. Edward Brongersma. Other porn conference attendees included pedophile champions John DeCecco, Daniel Tsang, and Wayne Dynes. Mr. DeCecco, an admitted pedophile, is head of the San Francisco State University Sex Research Center, which competes with its CSUN counterpart for the title of Left Coast Kinsey Institute. Tsang is the editor of The Age of Taboo, published by the fagot Alyson Publishers. Also, radical pedophile femi-Leninist Kate Millet, an editor of the Journal of Pedophilia, was there. Joining this vile pedophile professorate was Ted McIlvenna of the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality. This is the same institute that published and sold child-porn photos to Hustler magazine for use in a pro-incest article.

These swine have promoted child sadomasochistic abuse, child sexual bestiality, child group sex, child incest, etc. ACLU’s Nadine Strossen has defended in court these kind of crimes against children. Yes, this is the same Nadine Strossen who is regularly presented to millions of television viewers by Ted Koppel, Dan Rather, Jim Lehrer, and Tom Brokaw as the demure, brave, compassionate hero of the oppressed and articulate defender of liberty. As the CSUN pedo-porn palaver showed, the ACLU is joined at the hip with the meanest of predatory creatures who callously victimize the most innocent and vulnerable members of society. And all these people are Democrats.

A recent study by the Family Research Council outlines in alarming detail the aggressive program of the sexual liberationists to eradicate all protections against the sexual abuse and exploitation of children, and to legitimize the pedophile agenda in media, entertainment, and academic circles. These Democratic swine are paid consultants to the multi-billion-dollar pornography industry, and their pro-incest, pro-pedophile materials are already finding their way into school sex ed curricula.

Pedophilia is still considered so abhorrent a crime that most people cannot even imagine that such a revolting practice could ever become accepted as a right in America. But a generation ago the same was thought of abortion and the vile act of homosexuality. The Democratic degenerate lobby is using the same practiced methods that proved so successful in legitimizing those crimes. They are assembling corrupt, prostitute academics to provide intellectual cover for their criminality. And they are talking up adult-child love to soften public opposition to pedophilia.

Is it possible that Americans could be desensitized to the growing occurrence of pedophilia? Absolutely. Especially considering the moral corrosion the Democratic sex deviates have already exercised on our younger generations through pop culture, media, and education. But the response of the California legislative committee shows that it is still possible to appeal to decency and to awaken righteous indignation and outrage against obscenity.

Pedophilia must remain an utter abomination. And the Democratic politicians, entertainers, and academics who rise in its defense must be subjected to the same scorn and revulsion as David Duke when he rises in defense of racism and the Ku Klux Klan.
4,294 views 44 replies
Reply #26 Top
GIDEON.........stop sounding like a brainwashed idiot!!! nobody makes the poor poor except themselves.


Right, Marvin. So, I can show up tomorrow at your place and you'll put me to work?

Maybe you oughtta READ the bible instead of thumping it...
Reply #27 Top
Gideon..........the poor usually lack discipline. We all must develope self control in all things or we won't fare well in life. We must study hard in school, we must stay away from drugs, we must control our alcohol consumption, we must show up on time for our work, we must have self control when it comes to sex, we must control our temper, etc. Most poor people have criminal pasts, usage of drugs and alcohol, they roam the streets looking for whores, they would rather be on unemployment than working, they lack all sorts of discipline. unless they change their ways, they will stay poor.
Reply #28 Top
Texas............i appologized for the naked Charlotte Church pictures. And i told you they were fake. I was just showing everyone how pictures can be altared.
Reply #29 Top
Damn you Marvin Cooley! You may have figured out our evil plan but we will be back!!

WE WILL NOT REST UNTIL THE US IS A NATION OF HOMOS AND PEDOS!

Muwahahahahaa.....
Reply #30 Top
WE will give the death sentence to all the pedos!!!
Reply #31 Top
Zoomba,
I dont want to take sides with respect to any previous issues that you (and others) may have with Marvin, but I had to comment on your post.

What's something good that democrats in general stand for? How about protecting the individuals right to believe in whatever faith they want to?

ummm....how do you figure this? All across the country the ACLU, which has the support of most of the democratic party by the way, attacks public schools that have not totally erased any christian references. Of course, references to Islam are left intact.....interesting. They have had quite an impact on the school system in my area. It is now forbidden to use the term Christmas Holiday......it's winter break. The same goes for Easter Holiday. On the other hand, non christian holidays like Ramadan are discussed in detail and often. My son is not allowed to right a report about the three wisemen's travels to pay homage to the newborn Jesus but he can write all day about the Prophet Mohamed and his trek to Mecca. I dont consider any part of this "good"......do you?

REPUBLICAN PARTY SUPPORTS THE ERADICATION OF MODERN MEDICINE!!!

I know you meant this in jest but do you really consider a partial birth abortion, modern medicine? Just for the record, I am not a "right to life" at all costs in all situations republican - just one with common sense that doesn't want abortion (modern medicine) lol to become the preferred form of birth control.

That's like saying you personally support murdering black people and burning crosses because you happen to belong to the same side of the political spectrum as the KKK.

What side of the political spectrum does the KKK support? I'm assuming that you'll answer republicans. If that is true - How did Democratic Senator Robert Byrd get in?
Reply #32 Top
Umm Marvin do you have shares in Peter Maxwells Company??
Reply #33 Top
Phoenix............Peter owns a company? I'll buy some stock, then.

Gideon!!! .........did you ever find the bible verse that says, "there are no righteous among the poor".
Reply #34 Top
Peter owns a company? I'll buy some stock, then.


He's a billionare.. maybe he could shack up with you. Your not for real that your hasseling poor people saying that they arent righteous?? Come on! Your starting to get funny!
Reply #35 Top
Marvin: THERE IS NO SUCH SCRIPTURE! ON THE CONTRARY, THE BIBLE IS FILLED WITH SCRIPTURES ENCOURAGING CHRISTIANS TO SHOW COMPASSION TO THE POOR.

IN REGARDS TO YOUR ASSERTION THAT THERE ARE NO RIGHTEOUS AMONG THE POOR, PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING FROM LUKE 6:17 - 26

17 He went down with them and stood on a level place. A large crowd of his disciples was there and a great number of people from all over Judea, from Jerusalem, and from the coast of Tyre and Sidon,

18 who had come to hear him and to be healed of their diseases. Those troubled by evil spirits were cured,

19 and the people all tried to touch him, because power was coming from him and healing them all.

20 Looking at his disciples, he said:
Blessed are you who are poor,
for yours is the kingdom of God.


21 Blessed are you who hunger now,
for you will be satisfied.

Blessed are you who weep now,
for you will laugh.

22 Blessed are you when men hate you,
when they exclude you and insult you
and reject your name as evil, because of the Son of Man.

23 Rejoice in that day and leap for joy, because great is your reward in heaven.
For that is how their fathers treated the prophets.

24 But woe to you who are rich,
for you have already received your comfort.


25 Woe to you who are well fed now,
for you will go hungry.

Woe to you who laugh now,
for you will mourn and weep.

26 Woe to you when all men speak well of you,
for that is how their fathers treated the false prophets.

THESE ARE THE WORDS OF JESUS CHRIST, MARVIN . . . BY THE WAY, OUR SAVIOR WAS ALSO A POOR MAN. FOR SOMEONE WHO CLAIMS TO BE SO RELIGIOUS, YOU SURE AREN'T VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE IN THE SCRIPTURES.

BTW . . . I AM SHOUTING BECAUSE IT SEEMS TO BE WHAT YOU BEST UNDERSTAND.
Reply #36 Top
Pheonix.......... of course there are a few people who are righteous and also poor. what if your hit by a weather disaster, for example. or what if you have a bad accident and can't work. or what if you have terrible parents and you must share the burdons they cause. but all to often, people bring on their own troubles. it is better to teach a man to fish than to give him fish. if you teach him to fish, he feeds himself for life. welfare gives people financial support, but does not teach them to support themselves. i have always been for job training and things like that. i am for teaching people things that make them functional and eventually successful. many bloggers think i am mean and hate the poor. i do not have anything against the poor, but we need programs that solve the problem of poverty and not make it worse. it is a very complex problem and it all must begin in the nuclear family. the government could help a lot if they would just advocate the proper solutions.
Reply #37 Top
texas..........the caps don't bother me a bit. in fact i can see large print better. lol
Reply #38 Top
MArvin what are YOU doing to help the poor in your community?? What practical things are you doing to help solve this problem??
Reply #39 Top
I have never seen any imoral group support republicans


So I take it, then, that you support the Log Cabin Republicans and the 1million votes that they (claim to have) brought to President Bush's election in 2000. You do know who the Log Cabin Republicans are, right? Gay Republicans. Gay Republicans that Bush courted in 2000. Gay Republicans who have decided not to endorse the President in this election but who continue to support the Republican party. Yep. Crazy as it seems, you share your party with "fagots." Rich, influential "fagots." You might even have rubbed shoulders with them at a party meeting. Better get some disinfectant.

But in response to your article, a university holds a conference on pornography because it is clearly a phenomenon in our culture. It is the function of our institutes of higher learning to investigate and debate (in order to understand and advize about) phenomena -- cultural, natural, theoretical, etc. You report the presence of objectionable folks, but you offer no evidence about the kinds of arguments and debates that happened at this conference. As a Dem and a liberal, I can tell you that I am against child pornography. At the same time, I also know that our kids are sexual beings long before the legal age of consent. I am sure one of the debates at such a conference conference would be: when does helping children understand their sexuality turn into pornography? There are many different positions on this question, Marvin, including yours. I am sure that there are positions (distasteful as they are to both of us) that are just as exteme in the oposite direction.

By the way, one would think that the GOP (as you describe it) would be wary of a performer like Brittany Spears who talks about being a virgin until marriage on one hand but celebrates her right to a slutty, sexual persona on the other. And she is (or was) a popular role model for young girls. A role model who is a Republican and a vocal supporter of President Bush. A role model who Senator Bob Dole leers at lustily in a Pepsi ad, telling his dog (but which one?) "down boy." Yeah, the GOP is the party of the sexually chaste and pure....riiiight.
Reply #40 Top
BUNGY!!!.........YOU CALL CRIMINAL FELONS OBJECTIONABLE FOLKS? DON'T YOU DEMOCRATS HAVE ANY FEELING FOR THE ABUSED CHILDREN IN OUR SOCIETY? PEOPLE LIKE YOU ARE CREATING A VIOLENT, SICK COUNTRY.

AS FOR BRITNEY, I HAVE NOT NOTICED THE REPUBLICANS ACCEPTING ANY SUPPORT FROM HER. AND THE REPUBLICANS ALSO TURNED DOWN THE SUPPORT OFFERED BY THE LOG CABIN FAGOTS!!!
Reply #41 Top
Amendment 1 of the Constitution. Even though the actual phrase isn't in there, church and state separation is essential in a secular democratic government.


This is a myth, based on the rulings of a Supreme Court dominated by liberal judges. Many scholars on both sides of the spectrum have debated it for years. There is no provision in the US Constitution for the separation of church and state, only that the government should not espouse one church or faith over another, for example, the Church of England.
Reply #42 Top
Rightwinger...............you are right, indeed!!!
Reply #43 Top
I think Marvin may be a little misguided, but I think his overall point is right on.
It does seem that the Democrats often support more of the....."morally questionable" or "suspect" activities than those of us on the right. Now, I have no problem really with homosexuals....what they do is between them and the God they ignore. When they die, they can stand before Him and answer. I may not agree with it, but who am I to judge? I'm a sinner, too.
Pedophiles, though, they ought to be castrated and have their foreheads tattooed with the words "I'm a pervert". There's a special circle of Hell reserved for them, I'm sure.
Reply #44 Top
Thanks, Marvin. You're not going to beat these libs with captial typeface.....you have to hit them where it hurts. With the truth.