Gideon MacLeish Gideon MacLeish

Hard facts on Islam and Terrorism

Hard facts on Islam and Terrorism

The question has risen repeatedly on joeuser and around the world as to the culpability of Islam as a faith in terror attacks around the globe. Although the information presented below will not put the debate to rest, I pulled it from hard firsthand sources and not from thirdhand information that interprets the data. I am giving you the information below and the source of my facts, and I invite you to examine the data for yourself. I present, from the data I have gleaned that, while Islam is not to be construed as a terrorist faith, the terror attacks around the globe have disproportionately had Islamic based militants as their source and should be actively decried by the honest God-fearing Muslim community.

I searched for a statistic on the number of Muslims around the globe, and the best I could find was a statement asserting that the estimates vary greatly, somewhere between 700 million and 1.2 billion Muslims. Knowing how these statistics skew to the bias of the presenter, we will accept a statistical mean of 1billion Muslims, roughly 16 percent of the world's population.

Below are the terrorism numbers from 1968-2004, as complete as I can make them.

year international terrorism
(U.S. DOS figures) int'l. and domestic terrorism
(RAND/MIPT figures)
incidents fatalities injuries incidents fatalities injuries
1968 124 34 132 32 191
1969 189 55 155 12 110
1970 300 128 215 105 161
1971 241 35 150 66 91
1972 528 147 171 191 166
1973 323 120 193 72 504
1974 429 304 237 229 690
1975 349 258 221 102 556
1976 468 406 325 346 805
1977 428 245 242 80 299
1978 544 438 242 263 405
1979 441 686 271 290 1,060
1980 499 486 268 156 332
1981 489 164 318 329 1,187
1982 500 129 384 188 637
1983 506 641 317 589 1,045
1984 565 329 326 182 502
1985 635 816 438 688 1,255
1986 612 591 379 346 1,221
1987 665 623 355 358 1,219
1988 605 643 1,131 377 593 1,869
1989 375 411 420 367 170 507
1990 437 218 302 121 366
1991 565 102 242 436 175 284
1992 363 91 636 310 154 751
1993 431 109 1,393 320 464 2,806
1994 322 314 663 333 397 1,088
1995 440 177 6,291 258 245 6,007
1996 296 314 2,911 246 551 2,957
1997 304 221 693 192 266 946
1998 274 741 5,953 1,265 2,149 8,079
1999 395 233 706 1,148 822 2,074
2000 426 405 800 1,138 776 2,537
2001 355 3,295 2,283 1,732 4,643 3,954
2002 205 725 2,013 2,645 2,709 6,708
2003 208 625 3,646 1,772 1,946 5,367
2004 588 1,441 2,935

source: http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/terrorism/intlterror.html

According to the Emergency Response and Research Institute, Islamic terrorists accounted for 56 percent of all terrorist attacks in 2002 (the latest year for which I could find full year stats)(http://www.emergency.com/cntrterr.htm). A further analysis available from the ERRI 2002 report (available at the site mentioned in this paragraph), breaks down the terror attacks by nation, and analyzes them more thoroughly. As this was a .pdf file, I was unable to copy/paste the research, and all statistics herein are hand copied.

Terrorism for the purposes of this blog is defined using ERRI's definition, as follows:

terrorism--premeditated politically motivated violence perpetrated against non-combatant targets by sub-national groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience

So, the facts we have here:

*The Muslim community represents anywhere between 16-22% of the world's population
*56 percent of all terrorist attacks in the most recent year studied were perpetrated by Muslims
*The total number of terror attacks suggest they are perpetrated by a MINORITY of the Islamic community.

The percentages, however, should raise some very serious eyebrows. When factions from a religion representing 1/5 of the world's population commit over 1/2 of the world's terrorist attacks, we have to conclude that the faith, as a whole, is more frequently interpreted to the radical end of terrorism. It is important that the clerics who do not represent this interpretation of the Qu'ran speak out and decry these acts, even where such denouncements may be politically unpopular. They need to cooperate with the international community in bringing these terrorists to justice, rather than offering them refuge. And they need to work together with people of all faiths towards creating a world of peace.

The Muslim world may be suspicious of us, but it is that suspicion that has created a wall behind which the terrorists hide. We need to work together to break down that world. Muslim clerics must own up to the culpability of those who would misuse the Qu'ran to their own violent end.

Some more facts from the ERRI report, just for general knowledge:

2001 terror attacks: 864
2002 terror attacks: 429

2001 civilians killed: 4739
2002 civilians killed: 1716

2001 civilians wounded: 3386
2002 civilians wounded: 4936

2001 Military/police/security killed: 586
2002 Military/police/security killed: 398

2001 Military/police/security wounded: 664
2002 Military/police/security wounded: 231

2001 Terrorists killed: 993
2002 Terrorists killed: 149

2001 Terrorists wounded: 110
2002 Terrorists wounded: 5

The official statistic for the number of wounded in the September 11 terrorist attacks is unavailable and not included in this total

respectfully submitted,

Gideon MacLeish
5,743 views 35 replies
Reply #26 Top
Solitair,

I understand well your response. What I want people to understand, however, is that I worked very hard to find as objective information as I could find. There are sites that are biased against Islam that would give me even more skewed figures, and, frankly, I know where to find them. But this article is not about hate, as if you pare down the numbers I have given it makes it patently clear that Muslim terrorists are an infinitessimal minority even among their own faith. As I replied earlier, the percentages are the rough equivalent of a 300 member church going on a rampage in America.

I don't feel that asking the Muslim clerics to stand up to these monsters is out of line, anymore than I feel that asking Christians to stand up to atrocities committed by their own factions is wrong, any more than I feel that asking Israel to atone for the atrocities committed by their own factions is wrong.The fact is, while still small, the radical beliefs are growing among the young (who have a natural predisposition towards radicalism no matter what nation or religion they're a part of...), and by showing these children that the actions of these terrorists are not consistent with the teachings of Islam, they can at least hope to stem the tide of "new recruits" to these militant minorities.

This article is not against Islam. This article is encouraging Muslim clerics to take a hard look at a problem that is plaguing their faith and stand with us in denouncing it. That is in no way inciting hatred.

It included many 'acts of terrorism' that are domestic in nature and related to separatist or independence movements. This may just be showing that more muslims feel oppressed and are demanding freedom.


Two problems with this, Paul. The first is, where it included it in the Muslim population, it included it in other populations as well. This is why I can accept the figure. The second is, terrorism is still terrorism. If it is against combatants, it no longer fits the definition. I will continue to elaborate on my feelings in my response to the next sentence.

believe only terrorist acts that are truly international in scope or focus (against foreigners, by foreigners or by multinational groups) should be counted as international terrorism.


I have a big problem with this. By this definition, Oklahoma City wouldn't be terrorism. Abortion clinic bombings wouldn't be terrorism. Slaughtering 350 people in a Russian school wouldn't be terrorism.

Those are all terrorist acts, and they should be decried as such. We cannot limit our definition of terrorism so as to skew the numbers so broadly.

If the Muslim factions feel oppressed, I understand that. But in committing acts of terror against others, they become oppressors as well. The reason these monsters haven't had international support is that they've pretty much shown what they will do with power once they obtain it. Remember what happened when we supported an "oppressed faction" called the Taliban against their Russian oppressors? What happened, as is often the case in revolutions, is that the resulting government was worse than the government it supplanted.

I do welcome your thoughts, Paul, but I also ask you to be open to the fact that if we are to root out terrorism, we need to be honest about its source. The 56% figure still leaves 44% unaccounted for, whose source needs to be revealed and dealt with. Unfortunately, the article cited did not provide that figure.

Reply #28 Top
Regarding Islam as a satanic religion. 1. Read Salman Rushdie's Book "Satanic Verses of the Koran" 2. Look at biblical history, the war against the jews and arabs is millenia long. The Arabs believe Ishmael was the favored son while Jews and Christians believe it was Isaac. 3. Islam is a counterfeit version of Christianity based on the ramblings of a power crazed "mullah" 4. The ancestoral line of arabs are the ammonites, egyptians, amorites, moabites, edomites, and the Amalekites. All of whom worshipped demonic apparations of stone. Many of the these pagan belief systems have made their way into Islam. So....yes, i believe, historically that Islam can be traced to a Satanic belief system. Not biggotted, just swayed by historical fact.
Reply #29 Top
good article Gideon and good research....
Reply #30 Top

Regarding Islam as a satanic religion.

Teacher, that is blatant smacktardism. And yes you are in fact a bigot.

Reply #31 Top
good article Gideon and good research....


Thanks, greywar.

Teacher, that is blatant smacktardism. And yes you are in fact a bigot.


Thanks for having my back on that one.
Reply #32 Top
The issue of terrorism and how it impacts us is one of the topics in , Four More For George W? Thi book is on the Web at www.authorhouse or from any of the online book sellers.
Reply #33 Top

COL,


How much money are you making to spam this book in all the forum responses? Here's a hint: You just guaranteed I WON'T buy the book.

Reply #34 Top
*bump* for relevance. I made this point already, no need to REMAKE it in light of the current debate.
Reply #35 Top

Saddam could kill hundred of thousands of kurds or shia muslims, but if any of them killed a sunni muslim in revenge, it's terrorism.


Saddam DID kill hundreds of thousands of Kurds and Shia Muslims. Genocide is worse than terrorism. Perhaps the genocide statistics should be compared to religious affiliations too.


Israel firing rocking in Gaza city and killing children is NOT terrorism but a revenge suicide bomber is.


I would have no problem with counting that as the terrorism of the criminals who hide among the civilians and attack from there.