joe-pro-photographer joe-pro-photographer

Bush is Bad

Bush is Bad

Divided, we fail

In my last political posting, I suggested Bush was one of the worst Presidents in history. My reasoning was straight forward: no matter what your position on the war in Iraq, his handling of the planning up to war, the execution of the war itself, and the poor after-thought about the conflict's aftermath, make him a nominee for Lousy Prez.

So, many more conservative bloggers took me to task on the intelligence leading up to the war. "No," they write, "hind sight is 20/20, and it's easy to see the intelligence was wrong after the fact."

The problem is,from the beginning, Bush forced the intel to fit his agenda. It's not me who says this, it's a chorus of people from both the right and left. David Kay, former head of the Iraq Survey Group, couldn't believe the lack of intel on WMD's when he started looking for WMD's after the conflict began. And although he had no intel, was given a rag-tag group to look for WMDs, he still thought the wMDs probably existed. As he dug into the reports, he understood how everyone was duped.

The Bush Administration relied on Iraqi exhiles to support the WMD beliefs. Some of these folks hadn't been to Iraq since the first Gulf War. Their intel was more than 10 years old. One was later arrested for accepting money from SH himself, under the oil for food program. He had been a regular visitor at the White House.

A leader doesn't take facts and fit them to his agenda. A leader evaluates facts and reacts to the facts. A leader inspires others to come forward and voice their opinion, even when that opinion is different from theirs. A leader evaluates his team, and watches for power hungry people who can't run their department (read: Rumsfeld), a leader works with the minority and incorporates their concerns, where possible, into his agenda. A leader works within the Constitution. A leader unites and inspires.

Bush did none of these. (Though whether he stepped out of the bounds of the Constitution is open to debate). He took a "you're with us or you're against us" approach.

The uniter turned out to be the ultimate divider.
85,723 views 215 replies
Reply #176 Top
166 comments? Really? Wow. I'm surprised/impressed ya'll are still following the argument.
End of quote


There must be some sort of latency - my comment was #167 and it was posted 5 minutes before yours.

funny
Reply #177 Top
The uniter turned out to be the ultimate divider.
End of quote


Joe, I can't disagree with you. Your observations and conclusions are probably correct.

For the record, I'm not a conservative, liberal, or any standardized classification. Nor am I Republican, Democrat, or "Independent." I just don't care. I think I'll vote for Bugs Bunny in 2008.

But Joe, I have to ask...why do you care? I mean, why would anyone truly care about an asinine president moving his military pawns around, making oil deals, bombing the hell out of dictators, and lying every step of the way. What purpose is there in obsessive preoccupation with politics?

Someone might be inclined to reply, "But cosmic retard, thousands of our soldiers lost their lives, and tens of thousands of Saddam's dissidents and insurgents lost their lives!" <---they are all career soldiers - who cares?

Someone else might say, "But cosmic retard, innocent Iraqi citizens were killed during the bombing and were just considered collateral damage! Bush is bad!" <---Yet, you fail to realize Saddam killed nearly 1,000,000 people in the region before he was deposed. A little collateral damage is nothing compared to Saddam's Blood-Bathist Regime.

But still - gruesome, grizzly crimes happen every day that you're unaware of. There is probably the golden nugget "cause" every activist dreams of unearthing. There are atrocities occurring every day which slip by the radar undetected. What's worse is the ones people know about and yet their interest is only piqued if it satisfies their political agenda.

The very people who accuse Bush of ignoring the Sudanese and Nigerian genocide are also ignoring it. They only mention it because its more ammo against Bush. They have no desire to save the Sudanese and Nigerians from ruthless Islamo-facist slaughter. It's just a cute argument against Bush.

Should I care about things that I don't know about? I know that sounds strange. But think about it. If events transpire without your knowledge, it's like a "tree falling in the woods." It might as well never have happened. I would venture to say there are countless genocidal crimes you'll never know about. They've been separated from you by time and space. The Battle of Carthage was far worse than anything Bush did, but the ethics are never discussed, nor is the carnage. This is because it was long ago and far away.

Should someone make a poster board sign and demonstrate for the ravaged Carthaginians, and someone needs to answer, and pay for these crimes against humanity? As daft as it sounds, there must be an assumed statute of limitations. How many years must pass before a genocidal atrocity is just another page in a history book (provided it was recorded)?

Since I'm separated by both time and space from the suffering Carthaginians, perhaps it isn't for me to worry about. Why should I care about the poor Carthaginians? Why aren't you concerned?

To be quite honest, I don't have the energy to busy myself with foreign affairs. Maybe if I were a career solider, I would feel more inclined to go kick some Sudanese butt. But I'm just a computer programmer.
Reply #178 Top
(Citizen)cosmic retard
November 24, 2007 11:17:39
Reply #177
End of quote


Reply #179 Top
But Joe, I have to ask...why do you care? I mean, why would anyone truly care about an asinine president moving his military pawns around, making oil deals, bombing the hell out of dictators, and lying every step of the way. What purpose is there in obsessive preoccupation with politics?


I care because in my job I work for both left leaning and right leaning groups. When I photograph, I have to bite my tongue (sometimes hard)as the nuts on both sides go on and on an on and on. I CAN'T respond. So I have all this pent up AAGGGGHHHHH stuck inside of me I've been wanting to vent for some time.

I think it's important on so many levels. A government not being watched and criticized is a government to do carte blanch whatever they want. And, despite what you write, you've chimed in with some great comments in this thread. So, obviously, if we look at your actions and not your words (something I'm forced to do in my job), you do care.

I actually am an ancient history buff. I have trips planned to Athens and Egypt this coming year. I think it's human nature to want to know where we've been and use that knowledge to predict the future. When we see past mistakes being repeated, an alarm sounds deep within.

Peace!
M
Reply #180 Top
I think just about everything that could be said has been about this subject.

What would interesting to read is what are we, you, me going to do as individuals to help change things?

The people in power aren't going to "rock the boat", and need I remind you it was all of us that put them there, whether you want to admit it or not. We either did it by our actions or non-actions, as it were. Swallow hard on that one.   
Reply #181 Top

Oh, god, I hope not. Surely he can't be that stupid, can he? A three front war?
End of quote


Send chills down my spine as well...the thought that troops on the ground would be spread so thinly leads me to believe that if Bush declared war on Iran, it would predominantly be an aerial assault to begin with...blanket/cluster bombing 24-7 for weeks on end, and anyone with half a heart/conscience would agree that the collateral damage/loss of human life from that would be unacceptably horrific.

That was the method in the early stages of the Iraq invasion...B52's blanket bombing the crap out of Republican Guard positions, along with anything/everything else nearby or got in the way. To date I still have not seen any kind of satisfactory account as to the fate of those 100,000 plus Iraqi Republican Guards beneath that unseen death raining down upon them. While it may show some respect for the enemy's ability, it shows absolutely no respect for life and/or limb and is no more than an act of brazen cowardice. Had the boot been on the other foot, that's exactly what US troops and politicians no doubt would have called it.


I can think of many, previously great nations, this was the case for, dating back 3,000 years to present. Over and over again, nations fell because (even if their intention was good) they overstretched. I repeat: history should teach us, but I'm afraid it's lessons have been lost.
End of quote


The over-stretching thing is why I say it'll be open slather blanket bombing if the US declares was on Iran. Again, nothing to be proud of, with more wholesale/indiscriminate killing on a mass scale to completely knock the stuffing out of a technically inferior foe.

Damned intellectuals! That's the crap they teach you in those liberal ass univsersities? f**k (spit) f**k!
End of quote


Not all intellectuals get/were taught crap in liberal ass universities. Jesus Christ was an intellectual, and he taught the opposite of violent greed and aggression. In fact, like so many other true pacifists throughout history, Christ was persecuted, oppressed and eventually murdered for his non-aggression/pacifist beliefs: so yeah, despite huge steps in science and technology, we have only progressed very minimally in the 2000+ years since. It's not that history's lessons have been lost, it's more that people choose to ignore them unless they're profitable and represent the opposite of what they'd rather do.

Actually, Bush needs the kind of thrashing our (no longer PM) lil Johnny got, and to be replaced by a penguin. Yeah, I know, you shouldn't mix politics and religion, but a nun in the Oval Office might'nt be such a bad idea....one like wot took to John Belushi in the Blues Brothers for cussing. She'd be tough enough to get out the black-board ruler for those pollies who get out of line with war speak, yet good and kind hearted enough to look out for those who need help. Where's Julie(Sound of Music) Andrews when you need her?
Reply #182 Top
Unfortunately this is far from over in the middle east. With the discovery of all that natural gas that is below the oil wells we'll be fighting for that area for a long time.
Reply #183 Top
It's those facts I thought didn't get a lot of discussion. Unfortunately, this thread has diverted onto everything from SH was a bad man to racist rants about who knows what. My ADD kicks in and I stop reading. It just kicked in now!


Yah. S'what always happens. Hence the joke. Not always thrilled about the execution of the war myself. But having seen what happens when Americans pull out of even one area of Iraq for periods of months, leaving the country is a bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad idea. Bad.

Worst president in history though? Come on. Andrew Jackson has him beat blindfolded. I mean he did actual ethnic cleansing for crying out loud. Our how about hoover? He turned loose armor and calvary on our nations vets in the stinking nation's capitol, killing their wives and children. And of course many of the most revered presidents were the most reviled in their day. Of course you have Lincoln, FDR, my grandmother thought that JFK was an abomination (she may have been right, but damn it he looked good), take your pick. Hamilton was nailed for everything from the US bank idea to his very public (thanks to Jefferson's buds) affair, and the insider trading that he used to pay her husband for it. Twenty years from now Bush may look very good in retrospect. He is certainly not the worst president, any more than than Clinton was the antichrist during the years I squirmed under the heel of his pathetic leadership. Jimmy Carter, now there was a bad president. Fair diplomat, decent carpenter, lousy president.
Reply #184 Top
Yah. S'what always happens. Hence the joke. Not always thrilled about the execution of the war myself. But having seen what happens when Americans pull out of even one area of Iraq for periods of months, leaving the country is a bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad idea. Bad.


What a great response, thank you. I admit to grandstanding here (and it worked). Bush is probably not the WORST President in history, though I'd argue he's in the lower percentage of his class, a familiar place for our friend.

It's time to look forward, rat man is right. Bush is a done, toast. For each day that ticks by, he is more "so last year". Maybe this go 'round we'll do better -- maybe not.

Here's one thing I know: Unfortunately, if we leave Iraq now, we have an implosion on our hands. The Democrats running who say "leave now" are as short sighted as this administration. The Republicans who blindly follow Bush's plan are equally contemptable. I really like Obama and his style, but can't vote for him for this reason. Whatever democrat wins the primary will be expected to run on an anti-war platform. Which means, those of us in the middle, may be forced to vote Republican. Man, does that leave a distaste in my mouth after this administration. If the Republicans put forth a candidate who is very conservative, what does a poor boy like me do???? I couldn't ever vote for Mitt or Fred. I have issues with America's mayors based on his pre-9/11 actions, though would vote for him I think over Hillary.

What a mess. Do you understand what I just wrote? Even after this fiasco, the Democrats are likely to put a candidate forth who a moderate would not vote for. What poll shows that? Wake the f***k up CNN.
Reply #185 Top
Unfortunately this is far from over in the middle east. With the discovery of all that natural gas that is below the oil wells we'll be fighting for that area for a long time.


History shows the persians (now this area) fighting the Greeks in, what 600 bc? The Egyptians off and on until the fall of the Egyptian empire with Cleopatra? THAT WAS 2000 years ago. Solutions to this area aren't gonna happen over night, or with the invasion of one nation. Solutions to this area may never happen. We need fresh ideas, approaches, and perspective. Despite my criticism, I give Bush credit for trying something -- at a staggering cost and perhaps stupidly -- a frustrated response? -- but he does deserve some credit for nerve. That and $2 will get you coffee at starbucks (a small).
Reply #186 Top
Iraq is Babylon

Iran is Persia
Reply #187 Top
Persia was a huge empire, Persia, that included parts of what are now Iran and Afghanistan. It's peak was about 500BC. It was the center of an empire that stretched west to the central Mediterranean Sea, east to India, and from the Gulf of Oman in the southern Russia in the north.

They were allies and enemies, off and on, with the Egyptians for 1,000 years before the birth of Christ. It's a popular misconception that Exodus occurred during Ramesses II, what? 10th century BC? My point is this: These conflicts have been going on for 3,000 years. Think about that compared to our own history. 3,000 years! More than 100X longer than the period between our Revolutionary war and now.

We are only a blip in history when you think this way. Kinda puts things in perspective. Are we writing the future hieroglyphs?
Reply #188 Top
Persia was a huge empire,


yes it was. but the persians came from iran.
Reply #189 Top
No,persia was before Iran, Iran came from Persia. But, I don't see the difference. My point is turmoil has been going on in the region for 3000 years, and will likely continue. We are a blip on the radar. Hard to think of ourselves that way.
Reply #190 Top
Hard to think of ourselves that way.
End of quote


When you look at the thoughts and deeds of Hammurabi WWW Link (6th king of Babylon), King Bush is rather primitive in his treatment of others.
Reply #191 Top
No,persia was before Iran, Iran came from Persia. But, I don't see the difference. My point is turmoil has been going on in the region for 3000 years, and will likely continue. We are a blip on the radar. Hard to think of ourselves that way.




no i agree with you. but as i said we are the oldest republic every
Reply #192 Top
Well, there was Greece. And Rome. 'Course, Rome had Caesar -- that ended the true republic. I wonder if there are any historical figures that compare to Caesar, running off and conquering foreign empires including Persia...God knows there are plenty of Judas!

No, no, I'm not really going there. It's a joke. I feel I better clarify.

It is kinda funny, though, just a little bit? I'm snickering. I don't believe George Bush is anywhere NEAR a Caesar.

But imagine what Col. Gene would say!
Reply #193 Top
OK, I know this thread has gone from Bush, to Persia, to Israel to ...geezo peazo. But I really want 200 responses. So, someone come up with more. Who wants to Hillary bash????
Reply #194 Top

In all of my 37 years living in Australia, I can NOT recall a single shooting in an Australian school, but sadly, it's a common occurrence in the US and kids.
End of quote

starkers....Footscray Tech [University it's called these days] a year or three ago.  Certainly not quite Columbine, though....

Reply #195 Top
I am extremely amused. Many are putting up other countries that the US should have intervened or the Coalition should have intervened. Hit Rewind! Everyone was bleating about Kurds and Shia being gassed and murdered in Iraq. Everyone was bleating about Saddam not complying with the Sixteen resolutions he was in defiance of for twelve years. Intervention was made. Saddam was knocked off his perch. And the great human knocking machine started. Civilians need to get some points through their concrete like minds. People die in interventions. Troops die. And civilians will always get caught in the crossfire when the enemy insists on hiding behind them or insists on wearing civilian clothing. Terrorists currently want ALL other faiths other than theirs dead. They are not interested in talking. On a battle field if anything moves it gets shot at....why?....he who hesitates dies of lead poisoning. If you want intervention then grasp the realities and quit whining when someone dies. It is going to happen. It is a given. Yes it is sad, yes it is painful, yes it would be nice if they could count up to ten and start playing war again. Problem is real war is no game and sometimes in order to achieve good for the majority and for the greater good some people need to die.
Reply #196 Top
The infraction was Saddam was not allowing unconditional inspections, Saddam was hindering inspections and arguing the point as he had done for twelve years, Saddam was producing weapons that were a direct violation to his agreements and was seeking to acquire weaponry from oversees from Russia, China and France and Germany. Weaponry found after the invasion proves that those countries mentioned were assisting Saddam to violate resolutions. Enough paperwork has been found since for us to form the opinion that Saddam had a definite intent to restart ALL weapons programmes after the inspectors had left and that he deliberately shut them ALL down while inspections were on. The long range missile program continued and was found by Hans Blix in the week prior to the invasion. Never mind the media smoke screen. Look at the facts. There is still a long list of weaponry Saddam failed to prove or verify to inspectors that it had been destroyed or dismantled or rendered safe. As for Iran. If she is attacked it will be because she arrogantly defies inspectors of a thorough nature also. Do you want to risk Iran having a nuclear weapon? If she is producing nuclear energy for peaceful purposes then why does she not simply open her doors for thorough inspection and prove she has nothing to hide?
Reply #197 Top
All I see is a bunch of people complaining about Bush.

Why don't I see anyone doing anything about the problems?

Complaining is easy. Take up a cause. Get involved.

Till then all you are is being part of the problem.

Be part of the solution.
Reply #198 Top
Bush is Bad
End of quote


No shit, I knew that before he even got into office.
Reply #199 Top
Worst president in history though?


Hamilton was nailed for everything from


hamilton was never president
Reply #200 Top
Cui Bono {Key Bone No} = Who Benefits From This Crime ?
Bush ?

Watch these films; 911 The great Illusion pt. 1/12

1 WWW Link Time 09:38

2 WWW Link Time 09:46

3 WWW Link Time 09:46

4 WWW Link Time 09:46

5 WWW Link Time 09:46

6 WWW Link Time 09:31

7 WWW Link Time 09:13

8 WWW Link Time 09:13

9 WWW Link Time 09:13

10 WWW Link Time 09:13

11 WWW Link Time 09:13

12 WWW Link Time 08:49

oh and We did not vote for Bush! He cheated .
remember back at is first term Florida was duped well the country was. and some of Bush's family was some
of the one doing the recounts.

Bush is the devil.

He is Killing our men and women for his gain..