lulapilgrim lulapilgrim

Contraceptive Sex Education rooted in Secular Humanism

Contraceptive Sex Education rooted in Secular Humanism

Planned Parenthood, etc. is in the details

Planned Parenthood aka 'family planning services' is the devil behind the details of comprehensive K-12 contraceptive sex-education ever since its inception in the 60's. Planned Parenthood's spawn is SIECUS, Sexuality Information and Education Council of the US. SIECUS designs permissive sex-ed curriculum and provides the materials, videos, books, etc. used in the kindergarten through 12th grade classrooms across the country. It's designed to sexualize our kids. By giving more and more explicit sexual information year after year, it gets our youth first accepting, then using birth control drugs, devices, condoms and abortion. It's all done under "amoral" programs with friendly sounding names...promoting healthy sexuality, self-esteem, reducing the risk, defining the family, decision making skills, etc. Many state laws are such that a school counselor or nurse can take a minor age girl to a "health" clinic or provide counseling without parents knowledge or permission. The parent or guardian will be refused in getting the information.


Recently we've learned that King Middle School in Maine, through it's on-location health clinic, is doling out birth control drugs to girls as young as 11 years old.

Here's a bit of history as to how that came to be. In 2002, Maine's state legislature enacted the law that defines and compels the schools to implement a certain contraceptive sex-education program. Maine's Education Commissioner brought in SIECUS Sexuality Education 2004 as the main provider of comprehensive sex education curriculum along with Family Planning Association of Maine. The system is totalitarian in nature and based entirely upon secular or atheist humanism.

Yes, abortion providers write and deliver the K-12th grade comprehensive sex-ed curriculum....all paid for by the good ol' taxpayers. They train teachers and hire nurses to implement it. The law calls for abstinence, and they say they teach abstinence, but it's only a token and always in the notion of stay abstinent to avoid pregnancy or STDs and until you are ready, and have contraception available. So as far as any abortion provider teaching abstinence, for all intents and purposes it's a complete farce. But just having it there, keeps unwary parents and school personnel and administrators happy.

It will be very eye opening if you research Humanist Manifesto I (1933),II (1973), III (2003) and the Declaration(1980) on the web. You will learn that secular/atheistic Humanism is the origin and foundation of the entire SIECUS Sexuality Education.

Quick Lesson:

The radical changes that transformed our culture and system of education based on Judeo/Christian ethics and morality into a Secular Humanist one started in Europe in the early 1930's.


Cultural and sexual reformers joined their ideas and a new philosophy of Humanism, atheistic and agnostic, was developed. They based their ideology on transfer of faith in God to faith in man, in science and in education. They wrote their basic tenets in the Humanist Manifestos I, II, III and in the Declaration. They had many people sign on to the Manifesto and signing on is still going on today. The Humanist's basic premise is that man can make a better world without God. For about 30 years, the Humanists couldn't get too far in the US because the Judeo-Christian ethic was too strong in public schools and in political life. It was after the "pill" was invented that they were able to push forward in the US and the sexual revolution was underway.

By the early 60's, Humanists had control of our public educational system from college professors, teachers, government agencies that provided funding and textbook publishers as well. They got control of the whole pie. It wasn't long before there was a paradigm shift in education in general and in sex-ed in particular. God was out, free sex was in--no consequences with birth control and abortion. As self-fulfillment is a big thing to them, any group arrangement was OK ---homosex, polysex, man-boy sex. They indoctrinate Humanism by using values clarification and situation ethics.

Here is the connection to our present day comprehensive, contraceptive sex-ed curriculum.

1918 to 1940 – The Birth Control Review was printed, which included articles from Dr. Ernst Ruden, head of the Nazi sterilization program.

1922 - In her book, The Pivot of Civilization, Margaret Sanger writes about working with William Ralph Inge, the dean of St. Paul’s Cathedral in London and theologian for the Church of England, about getting contraception recognized as acceptable by the church. In the 1930 Lambeth Conference, the Church of England did just that, making it the first major church to make such a statement.

1940s - PP helped to negate the Comstock laws and effectively opened the U.S. mail to sex information. Today there is a thriving pornography business because of the removal of these laws.

1942 Birth Control Federation of America becomes Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
1963 Birth control pill is announced as being safe, natural, and physiologic
1964 Planned Parenthood president was Alan Guttmacher a signatory of Humanist Manifesto II.
Planned Parenthood founds SIECUS (Sexuality Information and Education Council for the US.) The SIECUS guidelines are a full implementation of the concepts on sexuality as set forth in Humanist Manifesto II. Lester Kirkendall was the founder of SIECUS and a signer of HM II.

1965 - Estelle Griswold, head of PP of Connecticut, initiated the court decision, Griswold v. Connecticut. This decision struck down all laws in the United States against contraception and found in “the emanations of the penumbra of the constitution” a right to privacy in sexual matters. This “right to privacy” found in the shadows opened the door for Roe v. Wade eight years later, and recently gave cause to strike down the anti-sodomy laws.

1998 AFY (Advocates for Youth), a radical group promoting homosexual, lesbian, bisexual and transgender practices for teens and children returned from a research trip to Europe where they studied the European sex education model.
1999 AFY recommended the US through off our outdated and irrelevant restraints by adopting the following:
Beginning in Kindergarten children should be taught explicit information about sexual matters.
Adults should teach and prepare kids for having sex rather than teach them for abstaining from having sex.
Adolescents should have access to pornography.
Sex ed and discussion about teen sexual activity should be value free and void of discussion about morality and virtue.
Condoms should be readily available and accessible in middle and high schools.
All Abstinence Until Marriage Education should be banned from public schools.
A national socialized medical system should pay for all abortion and contraceptive services. (So far they have 4 of the 7 accomplished.)

These recommendations by AFY are due to the fact that in 1996 in Washington there started to be a sentiment for a return to modesty and authentic abstinence education was clamoring for some of the sex-ed federal funding from Title V. Planned Parenthood was/is livid about having to give up their monopoly on federal funding for sex-ed.

2002 AFY teams up with SIECUS, Planned Parenthood, the Centers for Disease Control, NARAL, People for the American Way, PFLAG, to attack authentic Abstinence Until Marriage Education funding under Title V and reinvigorate the sexual revolution. They turned from teaching Health information to teaching Reproductive Health information.

The mission and theme of the campaign centers around the 3 R's Rights, Respect, and Responsibility.
RIGHTS: Children have a right to reproductive health care. This means they have a right to abortion on demand.
RESPONSIBILITY: means that young people need to be taught that pleasure is a part of human development, children are sexual from birth, and so called "safe-sex" should be part of lessons K-12. Involves readily available contraception especially condoms distribution.
RESPECT: Respect is two fold. The adult world is to show respect for teens and children to self-determination, deciding what services they want, what information they want access to and when they are ready to have sex.
Also "respect" is for respecting and affirming homosexuality as normal. Lots of propaganda to do that--the latest is from the National Education Association, where they have affirmed teaching on homosex "marriage".

2002 Maine passed Family Life Education Law MRSA 1910. Number one and two read as follows:

1. "Comprehensive life education" means education of students in K to grade 12 regarding human development and sexuality, including education on family planning and sexually transmitted diseases, that is medically correct and age-appropriate; that respects community values and encourages parental communication; that develops skills in communication, decision making and conflict resolution; that contributes to healthy relationships; that promotes responsible sexual behavior and addresses abstinence and the use of contraception; that promotes individual responsibility and involvement regarding sexuality; and that teaches skills for responsible decision making regarding sexuality."

2. "The commissioner shall provide effective, comprehensive family life education for students in K to grade 12. In providing such education, the commissioner shall contract with local family planning programs, including, but not limited to The Family Planning Association of Maine or its successor organization, to provide:".....

The Family Planning Association of Maine 2005 annual report of non-profit organization shows annual expenditures of approx. $5 million dollars. It receives about 1/3 of that from state of Maine and another 1/3 from the federal government. (our tax dollars at work). MFPA has been in the abortion business since 1997 providing abortion in South Portland and in Augusta. It also operates a statewide sex education program developing and implementing sex-ed curriculums.

2004 Maine's Education Commissioner fulfilled the mandate to provide comprehensive family life education to K-12 Maine children with SIECUS**2004 Sexuality Education.

Bottom line: SIECUS, along with Planned Parenthood and Family Planning Assoc.of Maine are financially vested interests the state of Maine has employed to provide the comprehensive K-12 sex-ed curriculum throughout the state of Maine. It is the dog chasing its tail. It is a wicked bad conflict of interest. Planned Parenthood knows the pill and condoms give rise to STD's and classroom sex-ed gives rise to the pill and condoms.


My opinion is that everybody loses with this plan, the children, the parents and families, the communities, and ultimately our society. Sex Education based on Humanism delivers moral rot and broken bodies. There is no faith, hope or love in giving youngsters permission to engage in sexual activity. "
19,660 views 40 replies
Reply #26 Top

 

He revived hisCatholic stance on abortion and contraception to get votes in Iowa--it's not going to work in NH. But wait till he's in So Carolina.

Reply #27 Top

Quoting lulapilgrim, reply 24
I happened to learn this truth that contraception leads to abortion from Catholic Church teaching, so what?
End of lulapilgrim's quote

Because it is not the truth. The use of contraceptives help prevent pregnancy so prevent many situations where some may consider having an abortion. Abstinence does not work for everyone and when someone realizes that than they understand why many people advocate comprehensive sex ed courses. Personally I think sex ed in schools should be comprehensive and that parents should be given the option to opt-out their own children if they disagree.

Reply #28 Top

"Planned Parenthood knows the pill and condoms give rise to STD's." Wow that's misinformed. An un-true opinion isn't really an opinion: it's a lie.

Reply #29 Top

Quoting Smoothseas, reply 27
Because it is not the truth.
End of Smoothseas's quote

Across the board, contraception leads to abortion. That's the truth. You say it isn't. OK. One of us is right for truth is in possession.

Quoting Smoothseas, reply 27
The use of contraceptives help prevent pregnancy so prevent many situations where some may consider having an abortion.
End of Smoothseas's quote

I understand that but did you read my article?

In 1942 Birth Control Federation of America becomes Planned Parenthood Federation of America. In 1963, the Birth control pill is announced as being safe and natural and it 's wide use would bring consequences. It encouraged wholesale promiscuity and marital infidelity throughout the culture. In short we became a sex addicted society. The pornography industry is now one of our largest industries and its exploitation of women and children is horrible beyond comprehension.  But birth control isn't 100% effective and women and girls by the hundreds of thousands became/become pregnant and thus abortion arose.

Sure enough, in 1973, with the Roe v Wade decision, abortion on demand cames to towns all across America. 

How else does contraception lead to abortion?

 

Scientists have confirmed that at the moment the sperm and the egg join (fertilization), new human life is created, and is completely different from his/her mother. The creation of a baby occurs at fertilization and zygote stage begins the nine month journey. Birth control pills work in several ways....they act to prevent the release of the egg from the ovary, but very often breakthrough ovulation occurs and the egg is released and is available to be fertilized by the sperm. The pills also causes the cervical mucus to thicken making it difficult for the sperm to reach the egg, but that does happen and the egg is fertilized...and scientists have told us what happens at fertilization, right? The woman is pregnant......the fertilized egg by this time is 5 to 7 days old tries to attach itself to the lining of the uterus where it receives the nourishment to grow, but can't because the chemical in the pill prevents it by slowing down the movement. If the baby doesn't successfully attach to the lining, he dies and is expelled from the body during menustration. This is the process that's called Chemical abortion and is why the pill is referred to as an abortificiant. The pill, the patch, the IUD all cause chemical abortions.

 

Occasionally the pill fails, and a tubal pregnancy can occur becasue the pill slow down the movement within the fallopian tube, causing the baby to attach to the lining of the tube instead of the lining of the uterus. This is always fatal to the baby and is ususally harmful to the mother or fatal if untreated.

 

There are pro-abort medical doctors out there and scientists too, who'll tell us the pill never aborts a baby (the pregnancy) ......But....real science tells us life begins at fertilization....so.....if the pill prevents a developing baby from implanting in the lining of the uterus, a life has been terminated!

Almost 50 years now have passed of widespread use of contraceptives that has led to 4,000 abortions per day here in the US and 6,000 on a busy Saturday. But like other addictions, our sex addicted society refuses to confront its illness.

 

Reply #30 Top

I wrote: SIECUS, along with Planned Parenthood are financially vested interests the states who provide the comprehensive K-12 sex-ed curriculum to the state's education boards. It is the dog chasing its tail. It is a wicked bad conflict of interest. Planned Parenthood knows the pill and condoms give rise to STD's and classroom sex-ed gives rise to the pill and condoms.

Quoting brigittejo, reply 28
"Planned Parenthood knows the pill and condoms give rise to STD's." Wow that's misinformed. An un-true opinion isn't really an opinion: it's a lie.
End of brigittejo's quote

Why didn't you provide the full quote which after reading my article proves my case.

Planned Parenthood is in business for one reason and one reason only...to make billions of dollars. And they do.

We have an epidemic of people infected with venereal diseases, called STDS. Any objective person can only conclude that the staggeringly high numbers and instances of STDs are causalties of classroom sex instruction that's meant to sexualize our children and encourage they have sex by doling out tons of birth control and condoms.

Humanist sexologists from PP and SIECUS saw the advantages of institutionalizing classroom sex instruction and they have been steadily indoctrinating students into believing they can make up their own mind about who and when to practice sex as long as its "consensual" and practiced "safely".

In most public schools across America, the sex ed curriculum, the materials, the videos, the materials and services, including providing contraceptive pills and devices are provided by either SIECUS or by a coalition of financially invested advocacy organizations such as PP. They are the forces behind the sex ed programs that distribute condoms and contraceptives to minor age girls, promote and affirm homosexuality, and the use of sexually explicit materials. 

The goal is NOT to discourage students from having sex, but to prevent them from having children. The strategy is to teach students how, when, and where to acquire oral contraceptives, the patch, the diaphram, emergency contraception pills, sometimes without parents ever knowing, in fact, in some cases their involvement is seen as "interference".

ABORTION is discussed as an aspect of birth control, however, students are never told or shown the unpleasant realities of what abortionists actually do to kill the baby and remove him from the womb.

They tell the parents, the educators and the policy makers that without them teen pregnancies and STDs would even be greater. But you know what? What they are doing is increasing what they promise to reduce. This is the nature of comprehensive, permissive contraceptive classroom sex instruction and they know it. 

 

 

 

 

Reply #31 Top

Quoting lulapilgrim, reply 29
It encouraged wholesale promiscuity and marital infidelity throughout the culture.
End of lulapilgrim's quote

Wholesale promiscuity didn't start in the 60's. All you have to do is read your Bible to understand something as simple as that.

Quoting lulapilgrim, reply 29
How else does contraception lead to abortion?
End of lulapilgrim's quote

It doesn't lead to abortion so how else is not the question.

Reply #32 Top

Quoting Smoothseas, reply 31
Wholesale promiscuity didn't start in the 60's.
End of Smoothseas's quote

C'mon. Stop being difficult. Of course there was always promiscuity, but not in the degree that it became after the newly invented birth control pill. With contrception came sexual liberation!  With sexual liberation, came wholesale promiscuity. With wholesale promiscuity came a higher rate of divorce..more sexual diseases, etc. 

 

 

Reply #33 Top

Quoting lulapilgrim, reply 29
How else does contraception lead to abortion?
End of lulapilgrim's quote

Quoting lulapilgrim, reply 29
Scientists have confirmed that at the moment the sperm and the egg join (fertilization), new human life is created, and is completely different from his/her mother. The creation of a baby occurs at fertilization and zygote stage begins the nine month journey. Birth control pills work in several ways....they act to prevent the release of the egg from the ovary, but very often breakthrough ovulation occurs and the egg is released and is available to be fertilized by the sperm. The pills also causes the cervical mucus to thicken making it difficult for the sperm to reach the egg, but that does happen and the egg is fertilized...and scientists have told us what happens at fertilization, right? The woman is pregnant......the fertilized egg by this time is 5 to 7 days old tries to attach itself to the lining of the uterus where it receives the nourishment to grow, but can't because the chemical in the pill prevents it by slowing down the movement. If the baby doesn't successfully attach to the lining, he dies and is expelled from the body during menustration. This is the process that's called Chemical abortion and is why the pill is referred to as an abortificiant. The pill, the patch, the IUD all cause chemical abortions.
End of lulapilgrim's quote

Quoting Smoothseas, reply 31
It doesn't lead to abortion so how else is not the question.
End of Smoothseas's quote

Instead of casting it off so easily, think on this one, Smoothseas.  

Above is a description of how Science has confirmed that Contraception are abortifacient drugs or agents used to cause abortion.  

 

Reply #34 Top

Quoting lulapilgrim, reply 33
Instead of casting it off so easily, think on this one, Smoothseas.
End of lulapilgrim's quote

I have thought it out. What other people do as far as family planning is concerned is none of my business.

Reply #35 Top

Quoting Smoothseas, reply 34
I have thought it out. What other people do as far as family planning is concerned is none of my business.
End of Smoothseas's quote

"Family Planning" is a euphesim for using contraception and abortion.

I have children and it is my business when permissive sex instruction is taught in schools and contraception is doled out to students like the school lunch. I pay for both.

And speaking of paying, as a tax payer, I don't want one cent of my tax money paying for others contraception and abortion.

 

Reply #36 Top

Quoting lulapilgrim, reply 35
"Family Planning"
End of lulapilgrim's quote

No family planning means I think we can only afford x number of children so lets find a way to not have x+ number of children.

Reply #37 Top

Quoting lulapilgrim, reply 35
And speaking of paying, as a tax payer, I don't want one cent of my tax money paying for others contraception and abortion.
End of lulapilgrim's quote

Neither do I but there is a big difference between advocating how one's own tax dollars are spent and trying to dictate what other people can or cannot do.

Reply #39 Top

Quoting lulapilgrim, reply 35
"Family Planning" is a euphesim for using contraception and abortion.
End of lulapilgrim's quote

Quoting Smoothseas, reply 36
No family planning means I think we can only afford x number of children so lets find a way to not have x+ number of children.
End of Smoothseas's quote

In the context of the article and discussion family planning is indeed a euphesism for using contraction and abortion.

Just Google "family planning" as see for yourself.

 

Reply #40 Top

Quoting Dr, reply 15
Interesting article and history.  Somethings to think about.  YOu nibbled at the edges of a tangental issue, but did not go there.  Perhaps in a follow up article?  And that is the connection between Margaret Sanger, Ernst Ruden, and Eugenics.
End of Dr's quote

Here is Mike Wallace interviewing Margaret Sanger on 9?21/1957!

 

http://www.hrc.utexas.edu/multimedia/video/2008/wallace/sanger_margaret.html