The Physics of Buddhism, Part One
from
JoeUser Forums
With palms together,
Good Morning Everyone,
If I say, "I am here and you are there", what does this mean? We see from our language that "I" and "You" are relative to each other. This relativity can be stated as "I-You". I-You only makes sense within it. I am tall, you are short; I am White, you are Black, etc. Looking outward, my understanding of myself is always in relation to other in the language of relational values. This was also a POV espoused by Sartre (see The Wall). Martin Buber differentiated this language by suggesting different word pairs "I-It" and "I-Thou". By the former he meant a relation between people on objective grounds and in the latter a relationship of a wholly different sort, a more subjective experience with the Infinite.
Now, if I look inward and more deeply and see that this "I" is a product of perspective, then what?
āIā see myself as a collection of molecules in interaction, what Buddhists call aggregates. These aggregates are always changing; they are, in effect, dynamic. Thus, there is no individual, separate, "I". There is no individual, separate, "You". There is just what Bodhidharma called "vast emptiness". This vast emptiness might also be called the Infinite and according to Buber, I can have at least two relationships to it, the relation of I-It and/or the relation of I-Thou. Moreover, the thought of "I" (indeed, thought, itself) is a product of a field we call mind, electro-chemical processes traveling between neurons in a brain. Thought, and the thought of I, or you, has no independent existence apart from this neural network.
Be well.
Good Morning Everyone,
If I say, "I am here and you are there", what does this mean? We see from our language that "I" and "You" are relative to each other. This relativity can be stated as "I-You". I-You only makes sense within it. I am tall, you are short; I am White, you are Black, etc. Looking outward, my understanding of myself is always in relation to other in the language of relational values. This was also a POV espoused by Sartre (see The Wall). Martin Buber differentiated this language by suggesting different word pairs "I-It" and "I-Thou". By the former he meant a relation between people on objective grounds and in the latter a relationship of a wholly different sort, a more subjective experience with the Infinite.
Now, if I look inward and more deeply and see that this "I" is a product of perspective, then what?
āIā see myself as a collection of molecules in interaction, what Buddhists call aggregates. These aggregates are always changing; they are, in effect, dynamic. Thus, there is no individual, separate, "I". There is no individual, separate, "You". There is just what Bodhidharma called "vast emptiness". This vast emptiness might also be called the Infinite and according to Buber, I can have at least two relationships to it, the relation of I-It and/or the relation of I-Thou. Moreover, the thought of "I" (indeed, thought, itself) is a product of a field we call mind, electro-chemical processes traveling between neurons in a brain. Thought, and the thought of I, or you, has no independent existence apart from this neural network.
Be well.