Absurdity

With palms together,

Good Morning Everyone,



Yesterday I did hill training in the morning. Hmmm. This means running up a perfectly good hill then walking back down only to run up again. It seems there was an old Greek myth about that sort of activity.



Sisyphus was a trickster and really full of himself. He was a con artist who did what he could to get what he wanted, often believing he could outfox the gods. In the end he was caught and punished. His destiny was to push a giant rock up a hill only to have it escape him just at the top.



We often think of this myth when doing something that seems repetitive and pointless. Yet, this myth reveals a point of view ingrained in the west, that the conclusion of an activity is its reward, rather than the activity itself.



This bias is so pervasive that we often don't see its destructiveness. How often do we go to work only to think about what fun we will have when we get off at quiting time? When we think this way, we are not in the moment at all and our work suffers. But more to the point, we suffer. By not being present with our work, we don't appreciate it. We fail to see its value. This is our hell.



Sisyphus suffered only because he wanted to stop his work. He suffered because he saw pushing the rock up the hill as pointless only because it was repelled back down again. But the pushing of the rock, itself, was just pushing the rock. Not pointless.



Pointlessness, absurdity, these are mental constructs devised by minds too full of themselves to enjoy their present state. When we do to do and not to get done, then there is no such thing as pointless and it is the notion that things must have a point to be worth doing that is, in fact, absurd.



Be well.
1,732 views 6 replies
Reply #1 Top
Interesting... but could the punishment of Sisyphus be a lesson in futility?

Ig
Reply #2 Top
Of course, but again, what is futility? It is doing something with something else in mind that cannot be accomplished. We might say, why do some such thing. And if the doing is for the sake of that thing, true. However, not all doing should be for the sake of something outside of the thing itself. Sometimes the value is just in the doing.

Be well.
Reply #3 Top
True, but at some point of the doing of the futile act, some sense of a negative or non-outcome has to be realized or all there will be is stagnation.


IG


Reply #4 Top
From where does futility arise? No one is saying we should not have an aim, but this aim needs to be in complete context always. When we work for the sake of something beyond work, then work becomes our enemy. We are not in it at all. This is real stagnation.
Reply #5 Top
Why did you post? For the sake of the posting? It does not seem so, for when you discuss the subject of your post with others, it is with a clear intent to make some point. If the purpose of your "pushing the rock up the hill" was just to be pushing the rock, then once you had pushed it, you wouldn't discuss it at all. In fact, all your posts should have zero replies from you.

It reminds me of a Buddhist story which I likely won't recall well, but I'll try (simply for the sake of trying)

A teacher asked his students to describe a container of water. Some described it this way, some described it that way. One student stood up, and without a word tipped the container over spilling the water on the floor and walked out of the room. The teacher dug that explanation. So do I.

Be well yourself, bro.
Namaste
Reply #6 Top
Hello Ockham,

It seems JU doesn't like me much. I posted a reply some time ago, but it failed to be received.

Excellent points! My posting is my work. I teach and write. Regardless of outcome. People are free to ignore, read, delete, or reply. Its what I do, so to speak. I enjoyed your story. I've heard it before. The sort of thing: you want to know the true nature of an orange? Take a bite!

Thank you very much for your reply.

A bow to you,

Be well.