How is Live Earth not doing more harm than good?
Can someone please explain to me how the Live Earth concerts aren't doing more harm than good?
Unless every single attendee got there by walking (and even then you'd have to factor in the carbon footprint of the companies that made the attendee's clothing, shoes and other items they were wearing while on the way) I don't see how Live Earth isn't doing more to actually add to global warming, rather than to get rid of same.
Attendees eat and drink when at the events. Hot dogs or Hamburgers that were cooked how? Bags of snack food that were made how? Even if you went entirely natural, there were farm implements and machinery involved.
The electricity to power the amplifiers, big screens, and other big electronics that were in use at the venues? How much of that stuff was solar or wind powered and if so, was there not someone along the way using something with a bigger carbon footprint just to keep their own power going?
Don't get me wrong and think that I'm saying that we should do nothing about global warming or just ignore it as a possible problem. I'm just trying to figure out why having concerts to raise awareness is part of the solution rather than being seen as part of the excess that has added to the problem.


Oh yea, what Doc said.