Question of the Day Question of the Day

Believers Question

Believers Question

Working & Consuming on Sundays

One of the Ten Commandments is:

Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor they daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. Ex 20:8-11

Sometimes on Sundays I get invitations to get a meal, go shopping, see a movie. Sometimes I need to go grocery shopping. But it feels like a contradiction – hypocritical – to do these things that require others to work. My consumption causes others to break one of the Big Ten. I feel the need to refrain.

I also wonder about the normal household stuff. Where should I draw the line?

So my questions are: How do you keep it Holy? Do you see consumption (as defined above) as a contradition of this commandment? Do you do housework on Sundays? Where do you draw the line?
18,570 views 86 replies
Reply #26 Top
conversation would turn to a 'rule-based' topic such as this


I created this article out of my Bible study in order that I might receive feedback from others. I do not see this as a "'rule-based' topic," but rather a discussion of a conviction that has been put upon my heart by the Holy Spirit.

I knew Christians who thought it wrong to lift a finger or turn a thought to anything that might be remotely described as 'work' on a Sunday; and others for whom it was one more day, except that on this day one 'went to Church' in order to clap and stamp and cry and wail in tongues. And having done that, they seemed to feel, they had discharged the obligations of their faith and were free to live for the rest of the week with no more than a passing nod to their religion.


I will in no way refute your claim. I see it often, but again, this is not the intent of this discussion. Christians are not perfect. No one is perfect. We all have a different idea about what it means to be a Christian and to be Christ-like. But this is not the intent of this article. I am looking for discussions based around living a holy life, specifically on the Sabbath, and other Christians' understanding of this, NOT about the hypocrisies of Christians in general. I stated that "I feel the need to refrain." I did not say, "all should refrain because this is what is in my heart."

I explicitly wrote about the Sabbath day, traditionally Sunday for Christians. I know that holiness is not a one day event, but I'm specifically looking for feedback about the Sabbath. Once again I'm not judging what others do, but reflecting on my own conviction. I'll not judge my friends for going to work, or lunch or a movie on Sundays, but I will respectfully decline the invitation. And if they ask, I'll tell them what is in my heart. Maybe my actions will have an impact on them, maybe they won't. It's not for me to tell them what to do or to judge them, but in that same light I'm free to have my own beliefs and convictions and to act on them in a way that does not impose their will on me. I'm not talking about outlawing anything on Sundays. I'm talking about my Sabbath, and the ways in which for me it is to be held holy. Yes, I've asked for other's feedback, but I'll take it in light of what has been revealed to me to be right for me. Being concerned about being a stumbling block has more to do with me than it does with them - addressing my beliefs and how I can faithfully live those in my life.

why do you spend your time debating the endless legalities of the OT - which were prescribed to the ancient Israelites as dietary & hygenic provisions suitable to desert circumstances.


I fail to see how keeping the Sabbath holy has anything to do with "dietary & hygenic (sic) provisions suitable to desert circumstances." Yes, the Ten Commandments are part of the OT, yes, they were given to Moses while in the desert, but how would not living in a desert climate make them any less applicable?

And if you're saying that the OT is useless today, I don't agree with you. If history is so unimportant why do we have historical scholars who spend so much time on the subject. Why do we bother to teach children history? It's because history hold many truths that are applicable today and in the future.

And as to how you keep the Sabbath holy... Do good to others and praise God, since it's justice and mercy that's required of the believer, not sacrifice. Or is that too simple and too lacking in 'legalism' for you all to deal with?


So what do you mean by justice and mercy as regard to the holiness of the Sabbath? If I say that I want to know more about why you wrote this and what you mean by ‘justice and mercy’ am I falling into ‘legalism?’ Or am I trying to learn what you really meant by what you wrote? (Which is indeed the truth and spirit of this entire article) Can you see my point? It’s not about legalism it’s about understanding.

For me not going out to dinner or to a movie would not be a sacrifice but rather a fulfillment of my own conviction. I’m not talking about flogging myself or anyone else. I’m talking about following my own heart and doing what I believe God has shown to me to be right for me.

Yes indeed. And you're all of you outstanding witnesses to the miraculous power of faith in your dead carpenter - since you are able to make towering mountains of anile argument appear from the slightest molehill of a cause.


And you're an outstanding witness for what? In my opinion, your even bothering to reply to this article, and in such a condescending manner, says alot about your character too. But I'll not condemn the entire race because of you, as you do all Christains because we're not perfect.

Go find your own molehill to run your ice cream truck around and leave us alone to have a worthwhile discussion.

By the way, any above questions are rhetorical. Please don't reply and please stay away from my articles. Thank you.
Reply #27 Top
If you're all so damn free in Christ why do you spend your time debating the endless legalities of the OT - which were prescribed to the ancient Israelites as dietary & hygenic provisions suitable to desert circumstances.


Hello EIC,

While I am not a Christian, I am free in the Dharma. This discussion is not a debate, per se, but a question (as I see it) about how to keep something holy. In this case it is the sabbath day, whichever one we are honoring. Rules and rituals, in my mind, are ways in which we build a fence around us in order to grow. Rituals, like workouts in training, help us develop discipline and focus. We learn that we can do something, we learn that doing and being can become the very same thing. When I light a stick of incense and bow, I am practicing humility and generosity. Now, I might not feel that way at the time, but with practice, just stepping up to the alter establishes a space wherein this practice can and does occur.

And as to how you keep the Sabbath holy... Do good to others and praise God, since it's justice and mercy that's required of the believer, not sacrifice. Or is that too simple and too lacking in 'legalism' for you all to deal with?


Frankly, I would prefer a world of unbelievers who practiced good than a world of believers stuck in their belief. Belief is only as valuable as the will to enact the belief and this will comes from practice not the mind. Legalism is a Christian attack on Judaism. The commandments are guides and we should practice according to them if we are Jewish. As a Zen Buddhist, my precepts are fluid, based in deep love and compassion for all things. I cannot speak for Christians.

Be well.
Reply #28 Top
(Citizen)KFC Kickin For ChristApril 2, 2007 15:05:41Reply #22
While I agree with you Lula in trying to keep a day for your whole family to worship God (I did the same) we have to be careful of setting up legalism that Christ himself did not impose. There is nothing in the NT on keeping the Sabbath. The Sabbath was given to the Jews and is part of the OT Law.




Catholic teaching on the reasons for, the meaning of and instruction given by the Third Commandment of God is not legalism in any sense of the word.

The Commandment rightly and in due order from the Second and the First, indeed prescribes the external worship which we owe to God as was done in Apostolic times ever since the Church was established at Pentecost. Observing the Third Commandment of God can't be limited to a personal belief in Jesus as one's personal Savior and be done with. The Third Commandment is much more than that and must be obeyed in the fullest because God is its Author.

For Jesus is God and God is the Author and Giver of the Ten Commandments and the One who inscribed them on our heart teaching us to distinguish good from evil, vice from virtue, and justice from injustice. The force and import of this law written on our heart is written in Scripture.

Yes, we both know that the Old Covenant was fulfilled, or perfected in the New and everlasting Covenant yet, having said that doesn't mean that the precepts of the Ten Commandments are no longer obligatory. When God gave the Ten Commandments to Moses He did not so much establish a new code as He rendered a more luminous light on that which was already there in the hearts of men. Sure, we aren’t bound to obey the Commandments because they were delivered by Moses, but because they are implanted in the hearts of all, and have been explained and confirmed by Christ our Lord.

The reflection that God is the Author of the Law should tell us about His Wisdom and justice, nor can we escape His Infinite power and might. By His prophets, He commands the Commandments to be observed, He proclaims that He is the Lord God, and the Decalogue itself opens I am the Lord thy God and elsewhere we read, “If I am a master, where is my fear?” Mal.1:6.

The Third Commandment (at least to Catholics) is about God’s design to make it clear to us His Holy Will on which depends our eternal salvation. Besides animating the faithful to the observance of His Commandment to rest, it calls forth their gratitude and worship. Scripture, in more passages than one, recalls this great blessing and admonishes the people to recognize their own dignity and the bounty of the Lord God. Deut. 4:6, “This is your wisdom and understanding in the sight of nations, that hearing all these precepts they may say: Behold a wise and understanding people, a great nation. And again, in Psalms, “He hath not done in like manner to every nation, and his judgment he hath not made manifest to them.”

The Saints, the Church Fathers and Catholics receive the Commandments and proclaim them with great solemnity.

From the words of St.Augustine, “How, I ask, is it said to be impossible for man to love---to love, I say, a beneficent Creator, a most loving Father, and also, in the persons of his brethren, to love his own flesh? Yet, he who loveth has fulfillith the law. Rom. 8:8. With reason St.Augustine prayed, “Give what thou commandest, and command what thou pleasest.” As, then God is ever ready to help us, especially since the death of Christ the Lord, by which the prince of this world was cast out, there is no reason why anyone should be disheartened by the difficulty of the undertaking of keeping His Commandments. To him who loves, nothing is difficult. Yes, obedience to the Decalogue is necessary for salvation.

What are the words of St.Paul to the Corinthians? "Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the Commandments of God." 1Cor.7:19. Again, inculcating the same doctrine, he says, “A new creature in Christ, alone avails." By a new creature in Christ, he means him who observes the Commandments of God; for he who observes the Commandments of God loves God as our Lord Himself testifies in St. John, “In that day you will know that I am in my Father, and you in me, and I in you. He who has my commandments and keeps them, he it is who loves me and he who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and manifest myself to him.” St.John 14:20-22.

I agree that at the death of Christ, when the Temple veil was split from top to bottom, the observance of the Sabbath was abrogated as well as the other Hebrew rites and ceremonies. These disappeared at the coming of Light and Truth which is Jesus Christ.

The Jewish Sabbath was changed to Sunday by the Apostles. They consecrated the first day of the week to the divine worship and called it ‘the Lord’s Day”. St.John in the Apocalypse 1:10 mentions the Lord’s Day and the Apostle commands collections to be made “on the first day of the week”. The practice of the Christian assembly (the early Mass) dates from the beginnings of Apostolic times. Acts. 2:42-46; 1Cor.11:17. The Letter to the Hebrews reminds the faithful “not to neglect to meet together, as is the habit of some, but to encourage one another.” Heb. 10:25. There are many, many writings of the Church Fathers that tell how Tradition preserves the memory of an ever timely exhortation : Come to the Church early, approach the Lord and confess your sins, repent in prayer....be present at the sacred and divine liturgy, conclude its prayer and do not leave before the dismissal.....We have often said: this day is given to you for rest and prayer. This is the day the Lord has made, let us rejoice and be glad.”


From this we learn that even then, the Lord’s Day was kept holy in the Church. Creation is ordered to the Sabbath ,the day to be kept holy to the praise and worship of God. Just as the seventh day of the Sabbath completes the first Creation, so the “eighth day” Sunday, the day of the week on which Jesus rose from the dead, is celebrated as the “holy day” by Christians-----the day on which the “new creation” began. Thus the Christian observance of Sunday fulfills the Third Commandment to remember and keep holy the Sabbath day.







Reply #29 Top
I think the QOD has to do with our behavior, however, not our belief. Believe one thing, do another, is hypocracy. How do we keep the Shabbot holy?


I'm sorry that I confused you. This is indeed about both faith and behavior. This faith I'm referring to is the Christain faith. And the bahavior follows from that faith. We are agreed about hypocracy.

QOD,

Thank you for your reply, though I am a bit distressed that you so easily dismiss my faith and practice as false. I have come to accept this, however, from Christians. It is in their nature, I suppose.


I'm assuming you mean KFC here? As I haven't replied to you until now. In everything I've read so far, I feel the same - that you are easily dismissing the Christian faith. Seems not just a Christian nature to me. (And as you say, I'm not looking to argue)

for example:


Your view is so narrow that the light barely enters...I trust you will open your heart and your mind one day.



I see Jesus as a good, if not sometimes misguided man. He was certainly not an enligtened Master and not the incarnation of God



Christians often seem to make it sound as though Jesus liberated Jews from the survitude of honoring God by following God's commandments. How strange is that?


You also wrote:
God's commandments are just what they are and they will not change, cannot be "fulfilled," transformed or morphed into something they are not.


But then you wrote:
Everything, including God, is change. Its all process, constantly unfolding.


So which do you really believe?
Reply #30 Top
Show me the place where God is not and I will show you True Emptiness. This True Emptiness is the very foundation of all things.


This is a rather strange statement. I don't quite know what to make of it and when said in another way, it seems you are saying that where God is not is the very foundation of all things...and put this way seems totally erroneous.


Just as it is impossible to say what Enlightenment is, so too it is impossible to say what God is. The moment we do, we slander Him. The great Jewish scholar Moses Maimonides said we could only define God by what he was not.


The Catholic Chruch teaches that God is the Supreme Being who alone exists of Himself and is Infinite in all perfections. God had no beginning, He always was, He is and He will always be. God is everywhere. God knows and sees all things. God has no body; He is a spirit and incorruptible. There is only one true God. We must know to love God by begging Him to teach us to love Him.

God has revealed much to us through Holy Scripture.
His existence, "The fool hath said in his heart: "There is no GOd". Psalm 13:1. "For the invisible things of him, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made; his eternal power also, and divinity; so htat they are inexcusable." Rom. 1:20.

His name: At the burning bush, God told Moses He was to be the deliverer of the Israelites. When Moses asked what His name was, God answered, "I AM Who Am." He said: Thus shalt thou say to the children of Israel: He Who IS hath sent me to you." Ex. 3:13-14. By this God reveals His essence is subsistent being itself, that He is not dependent on any being for His existence, but subsists in His own right. Everything else has but a borrowed being; that is, all else is dependent upon Him for its existence.

His nature: God is a pure spirit, incorruptible. There is no composition of any description of GOd.

He is unchangeable: "For I am the Lord and I change not." Mal. 3:6.

He is eternal: He had no beginning and will never cease to be. "Before mountains were made, or the earth, and the world was formed; from eternity and to eternity thou art God." Ps.89:2. "Before Abraham was made, I AM. St.John 8:58.

He is everywhere; He knows and sees all things: "Neither is there any creature invisible in his sight: but all things are naked and open in his eyes.." Heb. 4:13."For in Him we live, and move, and are." Acts. 17:28; Psalm 138 is a good meditation on the omnipresence of God.

He possesses each and every perfection in an infinite, unlimited degree: "They shall speak of the magnificance of the glory of thy holiness." PS. 144:5. "Neither is he served with men's hands, as though he needed anything; seeing it is he who giveth to all life, and breath and all things. Acts. 17:25

He is one: Not only is He one in that He is absolutely indivisible, but also He is one in that there can be no other like Himself, no other God. "The Lord our God is one Lord." Deut. 6:4. I alone AM, and there is no other GOd besides Me." Deut. 32:39.

He is Holy: For the angels cry out ceaselessly in His honor, "Holy, Holy, Holy" Is. 6:3.

He is love and Our Father:
St. John defines Him as love, "God is charity". "Charity" is divine love. Our Lord Jesus Christ tells us to pray to God as "Our Father" and continually refers to Him by this title.

He is just and merciful: Thou art just O Lord, and thy judgment is right. Ps. 118:137. The Lord is sweet to all, and His tender mercies are over all His works." Ps. 144:9.

He is all powerful: "For thy things are in Thy power and there is none that can resist Thy will." Esther 13:9.

He cares for all things,even the smallestby His providence:
"He made the little and the great, and He hath equally care for all." Wisdom 6:8.

He wants all men to be saved. "Who will have all men to be saved, and to come to the knowledge of the truth?" 1Tim. 2:4.

St.Thomas Aquinas said, "The study of God is the only study which can be called wisdom in the fullest sense of the word."
Reply #31 Top

But then you wrote:

Everything, including God, is change. Its all process, constantly unfolding.


So which do you really believe?


hahahahahah BUSTED!!!

Since God is truth. And we know that truth does not change. God, therefore, does not change. He is the same today, yesterday and forever.

Belief is only as valuable as the will to enact the belief and this will comes from practice not the mind


everything we do starts with a thought. Everything. Every movement we make regardless knowingly or unknowingly comes from the brain. My son researches and works on the brain and we have really good discussions. There's a saying I like to quote from time to time. It goes like this.

Sow a thought, reap an action
Sow an action, reap a habit
Sow a habit, reap a destiny

I'm not sure where your reasoning is coming from, but it's very faulty and not logical Sodaiho. It sounds very flowery but it's like a well without water.

Legalism is a Christian attack on Judaism


I only have two words for this: Orthodox Judaism.

If anyone is doing any attacking here it's you as QOD has so pointed out. I have yet to say anything about your belief or Buddhism. I love the Jewish religion and am very grateful for it. I think the Jews are the greatest proof of the validiy of the scriptures and are still the people chosen by God.

Reply #32 Top
Do you do housework on Sundays?


Ugh. Sundays. That boring day of hangover and malaise that preceed Monday...

Reply #33 Top
Rituals, like workouts in training, help us develop discipline and focus. We learn that we can do something, we learn that doing and being can become the very same thing. When I light a stick of incense and bow, I am practicing humility and generosity. Now, I might not feel that way at the time, but with practice, just stepping up to the alter establishes a space wherein this practice can and does occur.


I see ritual in a different way that you do. I think ritual has a place for many people and maybe it works for you and them. But it doesn't work for me. I've seen it in my whole life.

But maybe we define ritual in a different way. When I speak of ritual I think specifically in light of worship in a church. Such things as a benediction, the apostles' creed, the Lord's prayer. This is NOT to say that I believe they don't have value - they have the utmost value and are sacred. But for me being ritualistic about them reduces them to a rote act in which they have less meaning. After memorizing and reciting them in church for years their meanings become lost. I'd much rather study, contemplate, and exercise them. In this way they do indeed help me learn discipline and focus.

I hold the same view of a rote prayer over a meal. It's more meaningful and genuine if I earnestly pray individual prayers at each.
Reply #34 Top
The Catholic Church interprets it this way and see if it makes sense to you


The words, "He rested" mean that after the sith day, after the creation of man, God created no new kind of being. He rested from this particular work, i.e. from creating.


With the creation of man, God's plan of creation was completed


Sorry Lola and KFC, your explanation creates more problem than it solves.

the Day of rest that God supposedly took was after the creation of the Earth and the Heavens, their governing laws and whatever within them. Man's creation came later .... much much later.

To say that He is finished with the business of Creation after Man's creation has no basis in what He said. To say "God's plan of creation was completed" is very presumptuous since His palns are only for Him to know and no one else knows what they are.

You say "no matter the translation", i think it matters a lot and i believe it is the translation that injected "rested" in His statement. i wish the original "Text of God's word" is there somewhere so we can see what kind of meaning it really implies within the context of the whole topic not just translation using a dictionary. As you certainly know, the same word can mean different meaning depends on the context. In English for example, the word "mean" can imply so many meanings and if you dont know the context you cant correctly translate it. I think that is what happened here. God does not rest because He does not tire and His powers including Creation has no end or limit. We cant impose our limited understanding on His unlimited powers or plans.



Reply #35 Top
The writers made it very clear that we can KNOW his "revealed" plan for mankind


That is my point KFC. it is the writers, not HIm who say these things. and it is not only one writer, they are many.

these writers wrote what they think He said NOT what He said. He specified to whom he revealed his words. only words from those messengers count, all others are just their understanding not His words.

his plans were revealed to his friends.


So His firends know God's plans? so the unseen is known to them too?

So His friends are All-Knowing too? just like HIm?

Amazing way of thinking about God. I tell you that.

Reply #36 Top
If anyone is doing any attacking here it's you as QOD has so pointed out. I have yet to say anything about your belief or Buddhism. I love the Jewish religion and am very grateful for it. I think the Jews are the greatest proof of the validiy of the scriptures and are still the people chosen by God.


KFC: Of course you have attacked my beliefs and practices, you just are so wrapped up in your own holiness that you cannot see it. What is "old testament" or the notion that your faith is the only true faith, your God the only true God, your particular brand of belief the only true belief, but an attack on any other testament or faith system? You also believe Jews are going to hell when we die. To exist as proof of the validity of how you corrupt the Hebrew scripture is a poor excuse to live. Excuse me if I don't quite appreciate your gratefulness.

QOD: Lets see if I can address some of your stuff.

A wave is a wave, yet it is also water. No contradiction, just different points of understanding. We can hold both a relative truth (wave) and an absolute truth (water) in our minds at the same time. Nothing is either/or. Either/or is a categorical delusion created by how our btrains process information. But just because it processes it that way doesn't mean it is that way. The universe is God, God is the universe. You said so yourself in your reply re onmipresence. He is also in this computer, then, and in the earth beneath your feet and in the distant stars. No contradiction. He is also process. Moreover, QOD, the Hebrew you quote regarding God's name is a verb. Moreover, it is deliberately not written in the Torah. We are not to make a graven image, so mysterious and undefinable is this God. The complete phrase is "I Am That I Am, I Will Be What I Will Be." Process.

As to attacks on Christianity. Let me say a few more words. I do not attack Christianity. Certain forms of Christianity attack me. You said yourself my faith was a false religion. I do not believe Jesus was the son of God in the same way you do. To say so is not an attack. It is a statement of my belief. Forto believe otherwise would make me an idolator. Moreover, it was Jesus who attacked the Temple, Jesus who, enraged, referred to priests and rabbis as snakes and vipers, hardly the words and deeds of an enlightened master.

Consider my world. In nearly every post, Christians refer to my scripture as an "Old Testament." Suggesting it is dated and not relevant. Moreover, I doubt any Christian would consider Sutras scripture at all. Yet, these are scripture for millions of people. Do I consider these attacks? No. Just ill-informed. I do think, however, it is disingenuous for Christians use the Hebrew scripture to justify their positions regarding a whole array of modern issues, but then as soon as the scripture is used as a litmus test to assess their behavior they cart out the old saws about Jesus coming to fulfill the scripture and offer a new covenent.

KFC seems to suggest that Christians don't have a sabbath nor are they obligated to keep it holy, yet I have understood that many Christian congrations in the US would like to see the Hebrew scripture's decalogue in public buildings and many support so-called "blue laws."

Oy.

Christians often speak as if they have a corner on the truth. How else does one characterize this but "narrow"? It certainly isn't inclusive or accepting of difference and diversity, some of the hallmarks of broadmindedness. So, these are not attacks, rather they are me holding a mirror to your words.

I would love to have a conversation with people of other faiths whered each faith member respected the other and thought carefully about the terms they use before they toss them out as if they were either accepted universally or value neutral.

Be well.
Reply #37 Top
the Day of rest that God supposedly took was after the creation of the Earth and the Heavens, their governing laws and whatever within them. Man's creation came later .... much much later.


huh? How do you figure? He took six days to create it all and on the seventh he rested. You're saying he created on the eighth and ninth and so on?

Have you even read Genesis?

To say "God's plan of creation was completed" is very presumptuous since His palns are only for Him to know and no one else knows what they are.


says who? Not the writers of the OT or the NT so who are you depending on for your information?

The writers made it very clear that we can KNOW his "revealed" plan for mankind. Jesus made it quite clear saying to his Apostles that they were not like "servants" who didn't know their master's plans but they were friends and his plans were revealed to his friends.

So maybe we're both right on this one.
Reply #38 Top
Man's creation came later .... much much later.

Ummm, my Bible says:

Gen 1:27
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created him; male and female created he them.

Further down

Gen 1:31
And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the SIXTH day.

and into the second chapter:

Gen 2: 1-2
Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made.

We cant impose our limited understanding on His unlimited powers or plans


I can only presume that you do not believe in the infallability of His Word?

Are we to assume that rest is always associated with tiredness? Can a person or God not rest out of satisfaction for a job well done?
Reply #39 Top
KFC: Of course you have attacked my beliefs and practices, you just are so wrapped up in your own holiness that you cannot see it


well the proof is on you I guess. You are very accusatory. You started right in on #11 before I even said a word to you. When I responded it was in kindness and informative, not at all attacking you. I can't help it if the truth seems to be attacking you. I have a right to my belief as you do yours.

From what I can see by your reply you are thinking the term "Old Testament" is an attack? Well it's not meant to be. To a Christian there are two testaments and to differentiate we say Old and New. We hold them both up as two halves of one whole. So you are way off base with your comments.

You also believe Jews are going to hell when we die


This just proves to me you have an ax to grind that has nothing to do with this thread. Where did I say this? Ever?

I believe Abraham is in Paradise. I believe Moses is in Paradise as well. Jacob, Isaac, Gideon, etc. Jesus was a Jew. All the Apostles were Jews. They are all with God. The early Christians were almost all Jews in the very beginning.

No, you my friend have a hangup with religion, not me. It's not about religion. It's about relationship. I have a feeling you don't even know your own Law and Prophets.

I would love to have a conversation with people of other faiths whered each faith member respected the other


please, don't even go there. I'm seeing no such thing from you.

You don't want respect. You want me to shut up. I'm quite aware of that.

Reply #40 Top
Dear KFC, My goodness. How to reply to you? First of all, let me say as gently as possible that I do not want you to shut up or go away or anyhing of the sort. What I want from you is what I want from anyone, basic respect. Often my replies to Christians are in the same vein as their replies to me. Fire to fire and so forth. Because one person doesn't see the fire does not mean it doesn't burn. When you say that you never said Jews were going to hell, perhaps this is true. However, is it not a tenet of your faith that people who do not accept Jesus as their personal savior are? And if you are a believer in this faith, would you not hold this to be true? If not, then please forgive my assumption.

You are correct. I re-read your reply. I admit, as I always have, to some fierce defensiveness in contact with Christians of the fundamental sort. You know why.

I think we are actually on a very similar page with regard to your internal/external explication ofthe Pharisees. As we as with QOD's POV regarding ritual and rote learning. Perhaps this warrents some exploration.

Zen Buddhists holdthat our lineage comes from direct "mind -to - mind" transmission of the truth. The transmission is outside of scripture, words and letters. It means, essentially, a recognition of what is already present within each of us, our enlightened true nature. The transmission, then, is like a seal recognizing the bearer's witness to himself. Now, how do we get there? It is like a Christian asking the question, how do we know God? The answer, as I see it, does not reside in study of the scripture alone, though it is clearly a part, but als with practice. We learn from walking in the footsteps of our master, whether that master is Jesus or Moses or Buddha. To walk in their footsteps means to follow them in their actual lives. How did they live? What did they do? One of the things I believe is so very special about Jesus was his constant indfullness practice. Here is a man who knew he was breathing. He knew he was sipping wine. He knew he was listening or speaking. He did these things with his full and complete awareness. We should emulate this. So, it is not about the rules, you are correct. It is not about the rituals. Also correct. These are just vehicles. And just so, they are necessary.

KFC, I hold no personal animosity toward you. It is a challenge though, isn't it, as people from very different views sit down together, each hlding tightly our beliefs about the other?

You have, for example sid on several occasions that you doubt I haveread the Hebrew scriptures. I have repeated on numerous occasions than not only have I read them, I have mmade them as study and a major part of my life. They form a basis of much of my religious life. This said, my study and understanding of these scriptures is radically different from yours. Neither trumps he other, but to state a difference is not to criticize. Yet, I hear from you and other Cristians that my people's understanding oftheir own scripture, a gift we have given to the world, is in serious error. Can you see how this might rattle a cage just a little?

Be well.
Reply #41 Top
Sodaiho,

It would be much appreciated if you would review posts and then to address the correct person. You are attributing many things to me that I have not said. This is making the conversation unnecessarily convoluted.

Thank You.
Reply #42 Top
QOD, I will try. I thought I was responding to you, or to KFC or to whoever. I must be mistaken. Can you point out where I have attritibuted to you what you have not said?

You may email me off list if you prefer. My address is [email protected]
Reply #43 Top
I have no truck with any Christian point of view. I regard myself as a Christian, albeit one who is cynical, but I remain beholden to a Greater Power. Be free to have your say but just give a thought to the fact that the scriptures are not the be-all or end all. The problem with trying to justify any life-style by the scriptures is that two thousand year old texts do not apply to the reality of life today!
Reply #44 Top
Sodaiho,

From reply #35

Moreover, QOD, the Hebrew you quote regarding God's name is a verb. Moreover, it is deliberately not written in the Torah. We are not to make a graven image, so mysterious and undefinable is this God. The complete phrase is "I Am That I Am, I Will Be What I Will Be." Process.

Here for instance, it was lulapilgrim in reply #30, who quoted this scripture.

Also from #35:
You said yourself my faith was a false religion.

It's unclear to me who the 'you' in this statement is.

From your reply #25:
QOD,

Thank you for your reply, though I am a bit distressed that you so easily dismiss my faith and practice as false. I have come to accept this, however, from Christians. It is in their nature, I suppose.


I see no message previous to that in which I dismissed your faith. Another confusion.

These are a few examples. I'd suggest maybe quoting a person then responding. Or even responding in separate replies. Maybe I'm being nit-picky here, but I get lost in your discussions AND your credibilty is doubtful to me when you cannot even adress the proper person.
Reply #45 Top
QOD, You are correct! I am embarrassed. Thank you for pointing these out. Good suggestions, too. I will be more careful in the future. As an aside, I struggle with the quote function here as it seems to place the quote automatically at the top of the page while I may have already written in reply to some one else. Also, with so many Christian POVs it is hard to make you each clear in my mind. I will work on this, as I know that I need to. Just so, not all Buddhists are Mashayana or Hinayana. Not all are Zen or Tibetan or Vietnamese etc. In such discussions it is far too easy to get caught in a broad brush both when painting and when being painted. I bow to you.

Reply #46 Top
SODAIHO POSTS:
Everything, including God, is change. Its all process, constantly unfolding. Your view is so narrow that the light barely enters. This is the problem with text based religion. Yet the light is there. I trust it; I trust the universe. I trust you will open your heart and your mind one day.



Zen Buddhists holdthat our lineage comes from direct "mind -to - mind" transmission of the truth. The transmission is outside of scripture, words and letters. It means, essentially, a recognition of what is already present within each of us, our enlightened true nature. The transmission, then, is like a seal recognizing the bearer's witness to himself. Now, how do we get there? It is like a Christian asking the question, how do we know God? The answer, as I see it, does not reside in study of the scripture alone, though it is clearly a part, but als with practice. We learn from walking in the footsteps of our master, whether that master is Jesus or Moses or Buddha. To walk in their footsteps means to follow them in their actual lives. How did they live? What did they do? One of the things I believe is so very special about Jesus was his constant indfullness practice. Here is a man who knew he was breathing. He knew he was sipping wine. He knew he was listening or speaking. He did these things with his full and complete awareness. We should emulate this. So, it is not about the rules, you are correct. It is not about the rituals. Also correct. These are just vehicles. And just so, they are necessary.





Sodaiho, Good day. Just so you know without doubt where I'm coming from, I am Catholic and with all my mind, heart, soul and strength, I know, love, serve and worship Almighty God through the practice of the Catholic Faith and the teachings of the Holy Catholic Church. I believe Mosaic Judaism which has been perfected and completed in Christianity is the only revealed religion from God.

I realize that Buddhism knows nothing of God in the Christian sense of the word. But you have obviously studied Judaism, claim the Hebrew Scriptures as a basis of your practice of Zen Buddhism and have indicated that you know something of Jesus, and so you cannot be excused here for ignorance. Based on your knowledge, why do you dissemble and deconstruct Christianity in order to hold up Zen Buddhism?

You posted, “I am not a Christian and I see Jesus as a good, if not sometimes misguided man. He was certainly not an enligtened Master and not the incarnation of God,...”


In frankness, I find it pure folly on your part that you would say that and compare Jesus with Moses and Buddha. There are no comparisons or similarities. Jesus is God and He said so. “I and the Father are one.” The Jews knew it and said, “ For a good work we stone thee not, but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God.” Christ accepted supreme homage implied by the words of St. Thomas, “My Lord and my God.” Jesus would not have let such an expression go without correction had He not been God. We know that if ordinary men, like Moses or Siddhartha Gautama, claimed to be God, they would either be insane or untruthful. But Christ was not insane. He was ever a model of self-control and the wisest Teacher and Legislator the world has ever seen and will ever see. Nor was He a liar. His moral character forbids the possibility of a lie. Christ claimed to be God. He accepted the adoration due to God. Christ is God. The proof we have that Jesus Christ is God is His perfect fulfillment of the Messianic prophecies of the Old Testament. Christ really lived and His personal character, His teachings, His miracles, and chiefly His Resurrection. His work in establishing a Church, which is at the same time both human and divine, and has outlived empires and human institutions against tremendous opposition. Then there is the perpetual vitality of His sway over human hearts.

Siddhartha Gautama, the original Buddha, in sanskrit, “the Enlightened One”, taught the uncertain philosophical conclusions of his own limited and finite mind. Jesus taught infallible and divine truth. The fruit of the teaching of Buddha is a merely temporal proficiency in an imperfect human knowledge and conjecture. The fruit of the doctrines of Christ is eternal happiness. Siddhartha Gautama, “Buddha” was a mere man. Jesus was God. Buddha was a humanitarian. He was kind to his fellow men from motives of human and natural sympathy, not from motives of love of God and for His own sake, love of fellow man. St.Paul explains the uselessness of humanitarianism from the religious point of view, “If I should distribute all my goods to feed the poor and have not charity (supernatural love of God and man), it profitith me nothing.” Christ was essentially religious, not a mere humanitarian. He demanded that the love of God should be the motive of all our good works, not the love of our fellow man for their own sakes, God being simply ignored or not believed.


Jesus was publicly humiliated, hated, spat upon, scourged, crowned with thorns and crucified because of who He IS and what He said. He was believed by some and rejected by many. Not me, but the Holy Catholic Church (whose Deposit of Faith rests on Sacred oral Tradition and Sacred Scripture) teaches that those who reject Him will be rejected by His Father on the last day which will be the end of time as we know it and the beginning of eternity. Have you ever considered that the universe on which you place so much trust seemingly above all else will be no more?

Peace.





Reply #47 Top
Sodaiho, Good day. Just so you know without doubt where I'm coming from, I am Catholic and with all my mind, heart, soul and strength, I know, love, serve and worship Almighty God through the practice of the Catholic Faith and the teachings of the Holy Catholic Church. I believe Mosaic Judaism which has been perfected and completed in Christianity is the only revealed religion from God.



Lulapilgrim, thank you for your questions. Let me try to address them for you. I appreciate youre Catholicism. It is a wonderful faith. I even studied it with an Irish priest back in the late sixties. We can and do disagree on the point that Mosaic Judaism is the completion of anything. It is Judaism.

I realize that Buddhism knows nothing of God in the Christian sense of the word. But you have obviously studied Judaism, claim the Hebrew Scriptures as a basis of your practice of Zen Buddhism and have indicated that you know something of Jesus, and so you cannot be excused here for ignorance. Based on your knowledge, why do you dissemble and deconstruct Christianity in order to hold up Zen Buddhism?


I do not use Hebrew scriptures as a basis for my practice of Zen. I am both Jewish and a Zen Buddhist priest, although I admit I attend synagogue primariliy for my wife. My study of Judaism has been nearly lifelong. It includes a long study of the Hebrew scripture, the Talmud, as well as scores of other theological texts and modern biblical writings. I have a minor in religion obtained from a southern college steeped in fundamentalist Christianity. I have studied Zen Buddhism for over twenty years, and am an ordained priest in the Soto Zen lineage. I have been granted Dharma Tramsmission from my Teacher.

My rabbi and I have co-taught classes in Jewish meditation in the synagogue. Over the years we have become close friends and colleagues.

My knowledge of Jesus comes through both undergraduate academic study, as well as close contact with fundamentalist Christians of the Bob Jones University variety, hence I am a tad suspect of them. They typically want to "complete" me

As to your quote, I did not feel I was deconstructing Chistianity, just offering my unChristian point of view.

In frankness, I find it pure folly on your part that you would say that and compare Jesus with Moses and Buddha. There are no comparisons or similarities. Jesus is God and He said so. “I and the Father are one.” The Jews knew it and said, “ For a good work we stone thee not, but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God.” Christ accepted supreme homage implied by the words of St. Thomas, “My Lord and my God.” Jesus would not have let such an expression go without correction had He not been God. We know that if ordinary men, like Moses or Siddhartha Gautama, claimed to be God, they would either be insane or untruthful. But Christ was not insane. He was ever a model of self-control and the wisest Teacher and Legislator the world has ever seen and will ever see. Nor was He a liar. His moral character forbids the possibility of a lie. Christ claimed to be God. He accepted the adoration due to God. Christ is God. The proof we have that Jesus Christ is God is His perfect fulfillment of the Messianic prophecies of the Old Testament. Christ really lived and His personal character, His teachings, His miracles, and chiefly His Resurrection. His work in establishing a Church, which is at the same time both human and divine, and has outlived empires and human institutions against tremendous opposition. Then there is the perpetual vitality of His sway over human hearts.


Actually, there are many similarities. You say Jesus was God. I say he was not. The statement "I an the Father are One." Is silimar to the statement we Zen Buddhists say frequently, "I and the universe are one." Jesus could very easily have been pointing the the essentail non-dualistic basis of the universe. All three men went out in the wilderness. All three had eye-opening, heart-rending experiences. All three performed miracles. All three lead people out of suffering. There are several books regarding the similarities of Jesus, the Teachings of Christianity, and of Zen. Such comparisons are not uncommon.

You say Jesus was a model of self control. I don't know. He semed pretty upset in the Temple. Buddha nor moses lied to my knowledge. Both of these men were of high moral character.

The rabbis did not agree with you and the early church as regards Jesus' messianic claims. There is no evidence of a resurrection other than the self-referential sort listed in your scripture which is not bible to me and other non-Christians.

I see all three men as having lived out great lives. Buddha for one walked the earth for over forty years after his enlightenment helping people to end their suffering. Moses was shepard to the Israelites and lead them out of Egypt to the promised land. All three have outlived tyrants bent on destroying them and their followers. And Jesus, Christians say, died for our sins.

Siddhartha Gautama, the original Buddha, in sanskrit, “the Enlightened One”, taught the uncertain philosophical conclusions of his own limited and finite mind. Jesus taught infallible and divine truth. The fruit of the teaching of Buddha is a merely temporal proficiency in an imperfect human knowledge and conjecture. The fruit of the doctrines of Christ is eternal happiness. Siddhartha Gautama, “Buddha” was a mere man. Jesus was God. Buddha was a humanitarian. He was kind to his fellow men from motives of human and natural sympathy, not from motives of love of God and for His own sake, love of fellow man. St.Paul explains the uselessness of humanitarianism from the religious point of view, “If I should distribute all my goods to feed the poor and have not charity (supernatural love of God and man), it profitith me nothing.” Christ was essentially religious, not a mere humanitarian. He demanded that the love of God should be the motive of all our good works, not the love of our fellow man for their own sakes, God being simply ignored or not believed.


Buddha taught from an enlightened, all encompassing mind, completely in touch with the universe and its deepest truths. There was nothing uncertain about his teaching and the earth was his witness. The fruit of the Buddha's teaching is that we should all know ourselves, inttimately. And in this knowledge we know the universe. Buddha taught how to completely end suffering and there have been many buddhas to follow. Buddha loved for its own sake, knowing that love was the essential core of the universe. There is no difference between God, Buddha, and Man. Such lines are fictions created by our minds. Drop away the mind and the truth reveals itself. This is a truth all contempletives come to discover, including Christian contemplatives. His teaching has clearly withstood the test of time.

Jesus was publicly humiliated, hated, spat upon, scourged, crowned with thorns and crucified because of who He IS and what He said. He was believed by some and rejected by many. Not me, but the Holy Catholic Church (whose Deposit of Faith rests on Sacred oral Tradition and Sacred Scripture) teaches that those who reject Him will be rejected by His Father on the last day which will be the end of time as we know it and the beginning of eternity. Have you ever considered that the universe on which you place so much trust seemingly above all else will be no more?


Here is the rub. It is terrible that human beings have been and continue to be so ill-treated. Jesus is not alone in his suffering. Yet, for Jesus, he had to die in order to fulfill the prophesy as he understood it. I don't reject God, just understandings of him. I sense the Infinite is very, very large. How large? We cannot imagine as the end of it would presume a limit where none exists. My God is not a personal God then. At least not in the sense Christians claim, but I do have God in my life. As a parent I could not imagine killing my son. How could I imagine and justify a belief in a God who would kill his children? Or torturing them in hell forever? This notion is barbaric.


Lots covered here. I hope you are safe and have a good night. I am on my way to synagogue for Passover Seder. We will celebrate God and our freedom from slavery. I will also celebrate my freedom from suffering as a result of Zen practice. I will honor your God and the sacrifice he made in service to others. All who walk in such a path are bodhisattvas in this sense. Be well.





Reply #48 Top
That is my point KFC. it is the writers, not HIm who say these things. and it is not only one writer, they are many.


I believe Think Aloud that God spoke thru these writers. As I wrote on my thread, if we can use pencils to write down our thoughts don't you think God can use man to write down his? I believe the Bible is God's letter to us. I also have studied this bible for more than 30 years and am continually amazed at how the whole thing written by so many over a period of 1500 years can fit so well together, like pieces of a puzzle. Usually those against it have hardly (if at all) opened the cover.


So His firends know God's plans? so the unseen is known to them too?


in a nutshell? Yes. Remember Thomas the doubter? Jesus said what to him? "Blessed are you because you see, but more blessed are those who believe but cannot see." We see thru the eyes of faith the spiritual that the world dismisses and "will not" see. It's not "can not" it's "will not."

What I want from you is what I want from anyone, basic respect. Often my replies to Christians are in the same vein as their replies to me. Fire to fire and so forth. Because one person doesn't see the fire does not mean it doesn't burn. When you say that you never said Jews were going to hell, perhaps this is true. However, is it not a tenet of your faith that people who do not accept Jesus as their personal savior are? And if you are a believer in this faith, would you not hold this to be true? If not, then please forgive my assumption.


I believe I have given you respect that I have not received from you. You have constantly and consistently run down the Christian faith. Tell me you don't believe in it. That's ok. But don't tell me my Savior was misguided and my view is so narrow that light barely enters is not loving lingo Sodaiho. It's nothing more than attacks. I have not attacked you at all only explaining (using scripture as backup)where I'm coming from. I even used OT scripture knowing you don't honor or believe in the NT. You did not respond to anything I wrote concerning that I noticed. Did you even think on those beloved scriptures of the OT?

My guess Sodaiho? You've been hurt by "so called" or immature Christians. I am not like that but you've linked them to me because of it. I am strong in my belief, yes, but not at the expense of another. I've been involved in so many cults and groups and now have a relationship with Christ that is so freeing that I want others to have the same freedom I now enjoy. And one more thing that may surprise you and show you really how off you were earlier......

my great grandfather was a Jewish Rabbi. I have Jewish Blood running thru my veins. His daughter married a Catholic and that's where I ended up. I have since left the CC. My Uncle Harry a devout Jewish Atheist and also communist was very vocal in his un-belief. So believe me, I've heard it all.











Reply #49 Top
Buddha taught from an enlightened, all encompassing mind, completely in touch with the universe and its deepest truths. There was nothing uncertain about his teaching and the earth was his witness


I just have to ask this from your Jewish perspective and out of curiosity. Why Buddah? Why not Christ? Christ totally (and I've checked this out thoroughly) fulfilled all the OT prophecies concerning his first coming. I'm really studying the OT prophets right now.....Micah, Isaiah, Amos, Malachi, etc....even Moses wrote about Christ.

All three had eye-opening, heart-rending experiences. All three performed miracles. All three lead people out of suffering. There are several books regarding the similarities of Jesus, the Teachings of Christianity, and of Zen. Such comparisons are not uncommon.


but only one changed the whole world without even picking up a pen. Only one gave his life for the world. Only one was resurrected from the dead. No one else can make this claim. There were many witnesses that wrote of this great time in history during the same generation of people that could refute their claims.

As a parent I could not imagine killing my son. How could I imagine and justify a belief in a God who would kill his children? Or torturing them in hell forever? This notion is barbaric.


no, because you are not God. It's AGAPE love. When you studied the OT scriptures did you notice that when it talked about God creating the universe it used the term "fingers." and when it described the future redemption it mentions "arm" or "bare his arm?" It's all throughout......basically what it's saying is that it was a breeze for him to create the universe, but it was hard work for him to put his son on that Cross. Do a reference sometime on those words.

As far as hell? We put ourselves there. He doesn't put us there. That's where choice comes in. Moses said it choose between life and death. We will have no one to blame but ourselves if we find ourselves there. Hell was prepared for the devil and his angels, not for us. it's our choice to follow them there.




Reply #50 Top
"Drop away the mind and the truth reveals itself. This is a truth all contemplatives come to discover, including Christian contemplatives."


Thank you for mentioning this. I think it's telling that the contemplatives from all religions, have a view that is more similar to contemplatives from other religions, than to non-contemplatives in their own religion.

A question for the Christians,

I just read an article about the gospel according to Judas WWW Link.

What is your reaction to this? Can it be dismissed because it is not in the bible? I am also curious as to which version of the bible is the literal word of God and how it was determined to be so? I appreciate anyone who takes the time to respond, but I have a request to make if you do choose to respond. I do no believe the bible (or any other ancient religious text) is the word of God, so citing what the bible says won't explain anything to me.