EVOLUTION IS A FRAUD
How Science Cheats At Proving Its Theory
from 
JoeUser Forums
JoeUser Forums
The word THEORY, is a hypothesis that has been confirmed or established by observation or experiment, and is propounded or accepted as accounting for the known facts. To be considered a THEORY, something must be confirmed and account for the known facts. Evolution has been neither.
In contrast, a hypothesis is an idea or a guess at something without facts to support it. If the evidence proves the hypothesis, it then becomes a theory.
The idea of evolution has never reached that step. At best, evolution is a hypothesis. Unproven and without correspondence with fact, it stands as an idea scientists seem desperate to substantiate, though they remain unable to do so. An examination of the facts easily proves there is no THEORY of evolution.
Looking at the evidence is not that easy. I would think that the facts could be found in science books, magazines and articles. Certainly some facts may be discovered in the scientific literature, but the authors of such works seem bent on creating false and misleading information about evolution. Proponents of evolution often steer past the facts and go directly to the myths surrounding their beloved hypothesis that guides the writing of the textbooks and articles they publish.
Biology textbooks have a section about evolution. One of the favorite proofs commonly included in such a chapter is the similarity of embryos from a variety of animals and man. This is supposed to show they all had a common ancestor. The problem is, the pictures are not accurate. Ernest Haeckel deliberately distorted the pictures to fit his theory.
Haeckel’s fraudulent drawings are presently in at least sixteen major biology textbooks published from 1999 through 2002. In each case, they are used to demonstrate the supposed similarity of early embryos in different animals and man. These authors simply perpetuate Haeckel’s fraud in an effort to promote what they call the THEORY of evolution.
The problem is--the authors of modern science textbooks will include the faked pictures as proof of evolution even when they know of the fraud. Students are being taught these lies as if they are facts. The students then build their own belief system on such lies, only perpetuating the lies.
Even Darwin used the Haeckel lie. In his famous book, ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES, Darwin called the similarity of embryos as reported by Haeckel the strongest facts for evolution. There had already been many articles published in the mid-to-late 1800s that disproved the drawings of Haeckel, making it inconceivable that Darwin was not aware of the fraud. Yet he included Haeckel’s pictures not only as evidence for evolution, but also called them the strongest facts.
Lots more lies are intentionally being published in textbooks. An experiment done in the early 1970s that supposedly reproduced the atmospheric conditions of the Earth billions of years ago continues to be reported in science textbooks. It claims to show how proteins were formed. The scientific community has demonstrated that the environment within the test tubes was unlike any on Earth. There is no evidence the atmosphere was ever made up of the concoction used in this experiment, yet it is regularly referred to as a possible starting point from which all creatures have evolved.
There are multitudes of other false conclusions and outright lies in pro-evolution literature. These things continue to be included in modern science textbooks and articles. The reader must sift through the garbage to find the facts.
Even with all the fraud currently found in science, there are facts that can be discerned. It takes patience and work to dig them out of the scientific literature, which is so biased in favor of evolution.
Where are the missing links? If reptiles somehow changed and became mammals, there should be fossils representing the intermediate steps. But there are none. These missing intermediate fossils are referred to as missing links. And no matter what animal is studied, without exception, there is a gap in the records where these missing links exist. Through the millions of years and billions of animals it would take to evolve from one species to another, there is not a single fossil to demonstrate the link from one species to another. Yet the evolutionists base their conclusions on such connecting links as if they were commonplace in the fossil record.
Not one missing link has been discovered. This cannot be ignored. But that is exactly what pro-evolution scientists do. They refuse to release their grip on evolution even when the evidence contradicts their claims. Even Darwin was aware of the missing evidence for evolution. Missing links in the fossil record were a worry to Darwin but he felt sure they would eventually turn up--yet they never have.
Tyndall and Louis Pasteur proved that the law of bio-genesis applied for MICROSCOPIC forms of life. Evolutionists, geneticists, biologists, scientists in any field whatsoever, have never been able to demonstrate, nor to offer the slightest evidence that the LIVING can come into existence from the NON-LIVING! The spontaneous generation of a living organism is IMPOSSIBLE. Yet some scientists are so steeped in the theory of evolution, they cannot bring themselves to fully accept the absolutely irrefutable proof of scientific laboratory experiments! There is something wrong with a thought process ending with an IMPOSSIBLE conclusion. At best, it is irrational--at worst, it is an intentional lie. Either way, such reasoning is commonplace in the support for evolution.
It is difficult to sort out the facts from the fiction when researching the THEORY of evolution. But harder giving up an idea even when it is proven to be wrong. It is difficult to admit being wrong--to admit error--to unlearn false facts. The THEORY of evolution has repeatedly been proven wrong, yet scientists will not admit they have been wrong. In teaching lies to students in elementary, secondary, university and graduate studies proves how far they are willing to go to try to push their false THEORY of evolution.
The lie of evolution has imprisoned mankind with ignorance. As a result, mankind finds himself racked with unsolvable problems. If evolution is false, what other answer is there? As Einstein said--there must be a creator. There is no other answer.
In contrast, a hypothesis is an idea or a guess at something without facts to support it. If the evidence proves the hypothesis, it then becomes a theory.
The idea of evolution has never reached that step. At best, evolution is a hypothesis. Unproven and without correspondence with fact, it stands as an idea scientists seem desperate to substantiate, though they remain unable to do so. An examination of the facts easily proves there is no THEORY of evolution.
Looking at the evidence is not that easy. I would think that the facts could be found in science books, magazines and articles. Certainly some facts may be discovered in the scientific literature, but the authors of such works seem bent on creating false and misleading information about evolution. Proponents of evolution often steer past the facts and go directly to the myths surrounding their beloved hypothesis that guides the writing of the textbooks and articles they publish.
Biology textbooks have a section about evolution. One of the favorite proofs commonly included in such a chapter is the similarity of embryos from a variety of animals and man. This is supposed to show they all had a common ancestor. The problem is, the pictures are not accurate. Ernest Haeckel deliberately distorted the pictures to fit his theory.
Haeckel’s fraudulent drawings are presently in at least sixteen major biology textbooks published from 1999 through 2002. In each case, they are used to demonstrate the supposed similarity of early embryos in different animals and man. These authors simply perpetuate Haeckel’s fraud in an effort to promote what they call the THEORY of evolution.
The problem is--the authors of modern science textbooks will include the faked pictures as proof of evolution even when they know of the fraud. Students are being taught these lies as if they are facts. The students then build their own belief system on such lies, only perpetuating the lies.
Even Darwin used the Haeckel lie. In his famous book, ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES, Darwin called the similarity of embryos as reported by Haeckel the strongest facts for evolution. There had already been many articles published in the mid-to-late 1800s that disproved the drawings of Haeckel, making it inconceivable that Darwin was not aware of the fraud. Yet he included Haeckel’s pictures not only as evidence for evolution, but also called them the strongest facts.
Lots more lies are intentionally being published in textbooks. An experiment done in the early 1970s that supposedly reproduced the atmospheric conditions of the Earth billions of years ago continues to be reported in science textbooks. It claims to show how proteins were formed. The scientific community has demonstrated that the environment within the test tubes was unlike any on Earth. There is no evidence the atmosphere was ever made up of the concoction used in this experiment, yet it is regularly referred to as a possible starting point from which all creatures have evolved.
There are multitudes of other false conclusions and outright lies in pro-evolution literature. These things continue to be included in modern science textbooks and articles. The reader must sift through the garbage to find the facts.
Even with all the fraud currently found in science, there are facts that can be discerned. It takes patience and work to dig them out of the scientific literature, which is so biased in favor of evolution.
Where are the missing links? If reptiles somehow changed and became mammals, there should be fossils representing the intermediate steps. But there are none. These missing intermediate fossils are referred to as missing links. And no matter what animal is studied, without exception, there is a gap in the records where these missing links exist. Through the millions of years and billions of animals it would take to evolve from one species to another, there is not a single fossil to demonstrate the link from one species to another. Yet the evolutionists base their conclusions on such connecting links as if they were commonplace in the fossil record.
Not one missing link has been discovered. This cannot be ignored. But that is exactly what pro-evolution scientists do. They refuse to release their grip on evolution even when the evidence contradicts their claims. Even Darwin was aware of the missing evidence for evolution. Missing links in the fossil record were a worry to Darwin but he felt sure they would eventually turn up--yet they never have.
Tyndall and Louis Pasteur proved that the law of bio-genesis applied for MICROSCOPIC forms of life. Evolutionists, geneticists, biologists, scientists in any field whatsoever, have never been able to demonstrate, nor to offer the slightest evidence that the LIVING can come into existence from the NON-LIVING! The spontaneous generation of a living organism is IMPOSSIBLE. Yet some scientists are so steeped in the theory of evolution, they cannot bring themselves to fully accept the absolutely irrefutable proof of scientific laboratory experiments! There is something wrong with a thought process ending with an IMPOSSIBLE conclusion. At best, it is irrational--at worst, it is an intentional lie. Either way, such reasoning is commonplace in the support for evolution.
It is difficult to sort out the facts from the fiction when researching the THEORY of evolution. But harder giving up an idea even when it is proven to be wrong. It is difficult to admit being wrong--to admit error--to unlearn false facts. The THEORY of evolution has repeatedly been proven wrong, yet scientists will not admit they have been wrong. In teaching lies to students in elementary, secondary, university and graduate studies proves how far they are willing to go to try to push their false THEORY of evolution.
The lie of evolution has imprisoned mankind with ignorance. As a result, mankind finds himself racked with unsolvable problems. If evolution is false, what other answer is there? As Einstein said--there must be a creator. There is no other answer.
No one ever claimed to have generated life in a lab. That is a misrepresentation of the work.