What is Religion?

The context of my blog

With palms together,
Hello All,

Several people here at JoeUser have been offended (I suppose) by my blogs. Not intended. Please forgive me. I want to talk a little about how I see religion and what my role is as a monk and how I blog. Maybe this will help. In the western sense, religion is seen as a seperate aspect, like a category, of life. We understand God as a being greater than ourselves who resides outside of ourselves as "wholly other." We see time as linear. We see the universe as dualistic having a subject and an object. Our language is predicated on that model and worldview.

A Zen Buddhist doies not understand the world that way. We do understand the universe as essentially non-dualistic. God is not apart from us, nor are we apart from Him. He and us are one, just as you and I are one. Time does not have a beginning, nor did the universe, neuther wil they have an ending. Time and being are one, not two. All universes and the three times are one, right here, right now. In this sense, Zen Buddhism is a living religion where life itself is its church.

There is nothing outside of it.

When I blog, I am writing as a monk. I am writing as a concerned citizen. But most of all, I am writing to jar people sometimes, open their eyes a little, perhaps. I risk closing some, I know.

There are many misconceptions here at JoeUser about Buddhism and about Zen. I fear most of you know little about it short of what you may have seen in a movie or read in a book. First misconception: Buddhists don't make judgements. Wrong. Everyone makes judgements. The questionm is how wedded are we to them. We suffer in direct proportion to our investment in ideas. Zen Buddhism is not about ideas, it is about action. Writing is one of my actions. Buddhists are supposed to be compassionate, thefore they should not be critical or judgemental. Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Compassion is not fluff. Its not about taking care not to hurt someone's feelings. Sometoimes it is necessary to do just that to help them. While is not a good thing to be judgemental of people, and I try hard not to be, it is a necessity to attempt to understand and evaluate points of view, values, and ideas.

When I make a comment about religion, I am usually talking about my own and from my own religious point of view. Which as a Buddhist is very different from Christian monotheism. To assert the value of my own religion, its precepts and practices is not to place my religion on higher ground, as some of you have suggested. It is simply to say these are what we do. What we hold. What we value.

I value all religions, including those of the fundamentalists. And I will defend your right to hold the beliefs that you do. However, I will also reserve the right to point out problems in your behavior toward me and mine.

I am sure we will enjoy each other's company over time. I certainly hope so.

Lastly, there are two things that I do as a priest that I do regardless of where I am: one is that I place my palms together as a gesture of reverence to you, the other is that I wish you well. Neither should be taken as an advertisment of my faith. Its what Zen Buddhist priests do, that's all.

Be well.
2,019 views 7 replies
Reply #1 Top
There is a difference between making judgements and being judgemental. There is a difference between promoting change and promoting conflict. There is a differece between "asserting" your values, and rejecting humility by suggesting that other people's are inferior to your own.

You aren't pointing out the problems with OUR behavior, you're just ignorantly painting all the people in a religion with one brush. You claim to not put your religion above others, and then say things like:

"We don't just say, "I believe!" and go on being a jerk, thinking our belief will save us. Belief of this sort is for cowards and dilitantes. Living in a world-in-wait for somebody else to make everything right. "


Pardon me for pointing it out, but characterizing people of other faiths as jerks, cowards, dilitantes, etc., implies a serious judgmental bent, wouldn't you say? I don't have a problem with your beliefs, even the ones I condemn, but don't call a shark a jellyfish. Don't take on the robes of a Buddhist priest and then bludgeon people with condemnation.

I see you as no different that the fundamentalists you often condemn.
Reply #2 Top
Baker,

Do I even want to know what you think of me?
Reply #3 Top
Hello Bakerstreet, Goodness. I don't know how to say this any differently. I am NOT pointing to any particular religion with the quote you selected. I am saying that to say one believes in something, a precept, an article of faith, a God, a Buddha, whatever...one must do something with it. Faith is not enough, in fact, in my faith tradition, it is meaningless without action.

It is fair for you to suggest I use a broad brush with Christianity. It is not in ignorance, as I have pointed out on countless occasions, but on both study and experience. All of my comments regarding other people's faiths have been in the context of defending my own from their attacks, or have you forgotten this? My original post had nothing to do with Christianity per se, but Christians took offense. I point out how they offend me and you get bent out of shape. How interesting.

I have written to you a number of times, clarifying, attempting to educate you on Zen Buddhism. This particular post was an attempt to do just this. You do not respond with a discussion, but insist on recopying the same quote you have snipped several times to demonstrate just how widely you missed my original point. What can I say.

Be well.
Reply #4 Top

I do not agree with you, but that is why we are not all one religion.  I guess I missed some stuff as I dont mind reading your stuff, and so far, while perhaps poorly articulated, I have not found them to be overtly judgemental. 

I may.  But that is just me.

Reply #5 Top
I see you as no different that the fundamentalists you often condemn.


geeeeeesh Baker....I resemble that!!!!

Do I even want to know what you think of me?


I'm too afraid to ask.

Reply #6 Top
I don't often agree with you, KFC, but I don't count you among the people he is trying do describe. I don't really think he knows what he is describing:

[quote}I guess I missed some stuff as I dont mind reading your stuff, and so far, while perhaps poorly articulated, I have not found them to be overtly judgemental."

I think you have missed a post or two. In response to my annoyance at taking aim at FoxNews on his 911 tapes: gasoline on a smoldering fire blog:

" I will continue to point out the hypocracy of the conservative Christian right. They are the assholes that start wars, who then withdraw funding from Veterans Programs, who argue against abortion while cutting social services and fighting all over themselves to spend more money on prisons and executions.

I make no apologies for being a liberal. None. I think its about time some of us "softies" got up and figuratively slapped you candt assed right winger punks in the face. Now, go practice your crap or whatever you do to seeth in poison. And when youre done fimnd a quiet place and visit your heart . It just may have something of value to say to you. Oh, be well."


Buddhism? Hardly.
Reply #7 Top
Hello Bakerstreet, thank you. You are quite correct. Even I am offended by my unskillful and hurtful words. Be well.