from 
JoeUser Forums
JoeUser Forums
I'd like to talk to others about topics presented in any of these favorite articles pasted in here for you perusal.
Broadband: What's The Holdup?
The U.S. trails in the digital stakes. And catching up won't happen overnight. But P2P content providers could change everything.
When the news hit that Comcast (CMCSK ) CEO Brian L. Roberts was trying to buy the Walt Disney Co. (DIS ), it became clear that the media industry is in for some big changes. After all, one of the main reasons for doing a deal, Roberts argued, was to deploy Comcast's cable pipes for the digital delivery of everything from ABC newscasts to cartoons and video games over the Internet -- a goal Disney Chairman Michael Eisner has long espoused. There's just one problem: U.S. broadband transmission speeds are still way too slow to offer most of the kinds of cutting-edge digital delivery over the Internet that Roberts envisions.
In fact, the U.S. lags far behind global leaders such as Korea and Japan, where broadband is far faster and cheaper, thanks to more focused national policy, less cumbersome regulation, and more densely populated regions. For a little more than $50 a month, consumers in Korea can purchase a 20-megabit-per-second Internet connection. That's 10 to 40 times faster than a typical U.S. connection. In Korea, people use the service to watch TV in a window of their Web browser while they work on a memo in their word processor. Their access to movies and games on demand grows by the day. Such online services are available to few consumers in the U.S., where a 3-megabit connection costs about $45.
U.S. cable and telecommunications companies are working to close the transmission speed gap with other countries, but it will probably take years to catch up and cost billions of dollars. Here's a look at some of the key issues:
What's the current state of broadband in the U.S.?
Broadband is available to 89% of all U.S. households, but only 18% subscribe, according to the latest data from Point Topic, a London broadband research company. The phone companies sell digital subscriber line (DSL) connections for less than $30 a month. Their typical speed is about 500k to 1 megabit, which is fast enough to surf the Web, download music, swap photos, and download brief video clips.
Cable companies offer cable modems with peak speeds of 3 megabits for $40 to $45 a month. That makes viewing video and swapping photos a little more manageable but is still far too sluggish for speedy downloading of movies.
How does that compare to other industrial nations?
The world's broadband leader is South Korea, where 73% of households subscribe to high-speed Internet. Most Koreans pay $27 a month for a connection speed of up to 3 megabits. But a few thousand choose to pay $52 a month for a 20-megabit advanced DSL connection, which is much faster and cheaper than anything available to Americans. Japanese can get some of the fastest and cheapest broadband service in the world -- up to 26 megs for about $30 a month, using souped-up DSL. Europe's speeds and penetration are similar to those in the U.S.
Why are speeds faster in Korea and Japan?
This is less about technological prowess and more about policy. For one thing, Japan and Korea made the deployment of such services a national priority. What's more, the Korean government deregulated what had been a monopolistic phone system and opened the market to competition. That set off a race among providers to wire up the nation. Moreover, they weren't hamstrung by the regulations found in the U.S. All of the above led to the deployment of faster DSL and even a limited rollout of fiber-to-the-home. Finally, Korea is more densely populated than the U.S., cramming 48 million people into an area about the size of Indiana. Koreans tend to live in big apartment buildings located near phone company facilities, making it much easier and cheaper to deploy high-speed broadband.
Why has the U.S. fallen behind?
It's partly a chicken-and-egg problem. While the telcos have experimented with faster DSL service in recent years, it has yet to catch on with consumers. Why? Because there aren't enough applications, such as online movies and games, that require higher speeds. The same holds true for the cable companies.
Then there are the telco regs. The Bells argue that archaic rules designed for traditional phone services, rather than the Internet, discouraged them from providing faster DSL. In the past, the Bells were required to share their DSL lines with rivals at government-mandated prices. And while the Federal Communications Commission lifted those regulations in 2003, the Bells complain that the rules are ambiguous because a different set of overlapping regulations still requires them to share their lines.
Internet industry expert and film industry veteran Nolan Quan says “the world of entertainment is currently undergoing a major shift that will depend on faster Internet delivery to the home. As the major studios prepare to use Internet delivered entertainment content through delivery systems like MovieLink, a new company is launching a new and unique delivery system.” Quan continues, “much like Akamai has a large network of tens of thousands of computer servers located throughout the US and the world, it uses it own patent pending peering network to cost effectively deliver media rich content anywhere in the world at costs that has been as low as 3% of current costs. This network takes advantage of tens of thousands of super node computer servers and millions of smaller node computers beyond that.” This P2P content provider is currently building a mega network with plans to have more than 20 million nodes by the end of 2004. While broadband delivery is critical to the success of companies like MovieLink, P2P content providers rely on a reservation system more like NetFlix to order movies and other content, and can deliver its content over longer periods of time without impacting consumer satisfaction. In addition, such p2p content systems have seemingly limitless content, not just movies. It has signed contracts with content providers like CinemaNow, StreamWaves, AudioLunchBox and NetBroadcaster. It is also in discussions with every major studio for direct delivery of their movies, music and games.
How can the U.S. government help advance broadband speeds?
More deregulation is the key. FCC Chairman Michael K. Powell aims to classify both the phone companies' DSL and cable operators' cable-modem operations as "information services." That would enable them to avoid additional regulations associated with old-fashioned telecom and cable services. But a federal court decision against such a policy is holding up FCC decision-making on this front. In an attempt to make content providers less leery of putting their wares on the Internet, Powell has tried to force Hollywood studios, cable operators, and consumer-electronics makers to agree on standards to protect the distribution of digital content over cable and broadcast, but it's a tough slog.
What's the future of broadband?
Widespread deployment of the kinds of speeds required to carry HDTV, for example, won't be here for years. Walt Megura, general manager of Nortel Networks Ltd.'s (NT ) broadband networks unit, says Internet connections running at speeds of 10 to 20 megs won't become available to most consumers for at least three to six years.
In the meantime, U.S. providers are only just beginning to roll out services that will match the speeds currently available in South Korea and Japan. Verizon Communications (VZ ) plans to offer 10- to 20-megabit fiber-optic connections to a scant 1 million customers this year. SBC Communications Inc. (SBC ) already offers a 6-megabit connection for $199 a month that's aimed at businesses.
What sorts of services will be available once 20-meg speeds appear?
Broadband proponents argue that an investment in infrastructure leads to all sorts of new applications. Again, Korea is the model. The broadband leader's online digital content market, which includes gaming, music, and video, has increased 61% annually for six years. It reached $4.6 billion in 2002, the last year for which figures are available.
A similar effect seems to be taking hold in the U.S. Disney's ESPN network has a product called ESPN motion, which will make high-quality video clips available online. The same technology is also being used by Disney's ABC News unit for online distribution of news. And future versions of Apple Computer Inc.'s (AAPL ) iPod, which has driven the digital distribution of music into the mainstream, are likely to do the same for video as the quality of underlying networks improves. It's just too much information to cram onto a regular DSL or cable-modem service. In short, a new era in the evolution of broadband is approaching -- one that Brian Roberts was clearly counting on when he made his audacious bid for Disney. But it won't happen overnight.
By Steve Rosenbush in New York, with Catherine Yang in Washington, Ronald Grover in Los Angles, Moon Ihlwan in Seoul, and Andy Reinhardt in Paris
Comments?
Article 2
“Just as the cable device was a ‘must have’ device for homes in the 1990’s…the Internet is the ‘must have’ device for the home today,” says Nolan Quan, Internet pioneer.
Casting Milestones: The Internet Is Now More Wired Than Cable
By Joe Mandese and Ross Fadner
Tuesday, February 24, 2004
The term "wired" has long been used to describe the Internet, but now the online medium can truly claim to be America's most wired. According to soon-to-be-released estimates compiled by the stats-keepers at Web researcher eMarketer, the Internet has surpassed the U.S. household penetration level of cable TV.
Exactly when this tipping point occurred isn't clear, said Geoffrey Ramsey, CEO and founder of eMarketer, who made the startling conclusion in recent weeks and has begun circulating it among a small group of Internet insiders, but based on his analysis of a variety of sets of research data ranging from comScore and Nielsen//NetRatings to the Pew Research Center, UCLA and Harris Interactive, eMarketer now estimates U.S. household Internet penetration is about 67.9 percent. That compares with a 65.8 percent U.S. household penetration level for cable, according to an eMarketer analysis of Nielsen Media Research and U.S. Census data.
More significantly, Ramsey noted that while cable TV penetration has essentially been flat at about 66 percent of U.S. households, online penetration continues to expand.
"Wow," said Jes Santoro, vice president-director of integrated media at Earthquake Media, a media shop that buys traditional and online media, upon learning of the online penetration milestone from MediaDailyNews. "I think it is very significant. But it's symbolic as well."
"It's symbolic because it speaks to people's media consumption habits," he explained. "Think about cable, you kind of have to have it to have it to get TV reception. It's almost like a utility. But with the Internet, people go out and get it because they want to use the Internet."
“When we started in the Internet industry in 1995, 65% of all our traffic came from California” said Nolan Quan, Director of Alchemy Communications, a prime ISP in Los Angeles. “By the year 2000, 65% of the Internet traffic came from the United States.” “Now in 2004, 65% of the traffic comes from international sources and we need to change the way we as Americans think about the world. The Internet is the ‘must have’ device for the home today just as the cable device was a ‘must have’ device for homes in the 1990’s, the VCR was the ‘must have’ device in the 1980’s, the color TV was the ‘must have’ device of the 1970’s and black & white television the two decades before that.”
eMarketer's Ramsey agreed, noting that it was similar household penetration milestones that first got cable TV on the map with Madison Avenue during various junctures in cable's history.
That should be a "wake-up" call to the ad community, said Greg Stuart, president of the Interactive Advertising Bureau, which is looking at ways of promoting the milestone to the ad industry.
Not everyone agrees with the statistical symbolism, of course.
"I'm just wondering why it's relevant to anyone? If you're talking about cable networks, you have to talk about cable-plus [satellite/alternative delivery systems]. That's what online is competing with and that's what national advertisers are buying when they buy cable networks," pointed out Ira Sussman, senior vice president-research at the Cabletelevision Advertising Bureau. Sussman's point is that when satellite and other delivery systems are added into the mix, the major cable programming networks actually reach more than 80 percent of U.S. households, giving the medium of wired and unwired "cable" TV greater coverage than the Internet.
"It's an interesting statistic," said Sussman, of the Internet's penetration milestone, "but it's a little like saying [cable TV] is bigger than Reader's Digest. What does it really mean?"
Sussman also noted that cable ironically is pushing Internet distribution via the deployment of broadband cable modem lines, a development that some believe may lead to the fusion of television and online applications via broadband video.
Most significantly, he said that while penetration levels are important, it is actual time spent with a medium by consumers that translate into the audience impressions bought by Madison Avenue. And in that regard, cable still beats online media by a wide margin.
According to the summer 2003 edition of Veronis Suhler Stevenson's annual Communications Industry Forecast, the average person in the U.S. will spend 976 watching cable TV services in 2004, while the average person will spend only 182 hours online. Based on a total of 3,732 hours per person spent with all measured media, that gives cable a 26.2 percent share versus a 4.9 percent share of total consumer time spent with media this year.
But the IAB's Stuart claimed even those statistics may be misleading, because the quality of time spent with each medium is different.
"I think we need to be really careful about time spent on television. There's research that shows as much as 50 % of TV viewers aren't even paying attention to the advertising. So it's not real time spent. Whereas Internet time spent is real time spent. It's the difference between a lean-back medium like cable and a lean-forward medium like the Internet," he said.
Online Tops Cable Penetration, Lags Time Spent
Online Cable
Penetration: 67.9% 65.8%
Share Of Time Spent: 4.9% 26.2%
Source: Online penetration = eMarketer estimates. Cable penetration = Nielsen Media Research estimates. Share of time spent by consumers using consumer media = Veronis Suhler Stevenson's Communications Industry Forecast.
Comments?
Article 3
“This is not an unusual way to raise funding,” says Nolan Quan, Internet pioneer.
Dean Leaves Legacy of Online Campaign
by Brian Faler
Howard Dean, at his campaign headquarters in Vermont yesterday, raised $41 million in 2003 -- much of it online. (Toby Talbot -- AP)
Was it the political equivalent of Pets.com, the widely mocked Internet start-up from the late 1990s that ran on little more than hype? Was it a glimpse into the future of campaigning -- a blueprint that other candidates will someday adopt as a matter of course? Or was it something else entirely?
Few quibble with Dean's success raising money online. The former Vermont governor entered the race a virtual unknown, with little in the way of a national fundraising network. But he raised $41 million in 2003 -- much of it online -- eclipsing all his Democratic rivals and breaking former president Bill Clinton's party record for money raised in a quarter.
His success has been attributed to any number of real-world factors: his straight-talking persona, his opposition to the war in Iraq, the favorable media coverage he enjoyed much of last year. But experts also credit his campaign with developing savvy online fundraisers -- essentially online telethons that posted their goals alongside urgent deadlines and icons counting the donations as they came in.
It was a simple idea, employed by any number of public TV stations. But it was a campaign innovation, allowing Dean to turn otherwise mundane fundraising pitches into a high-tech call to arms. Experts said it was a significant improvement from how candidates had previously asked for money online -- usually, by simply urging supporters to send a check sometime before the next election.
That Dean's money came mostly in small contributions from hundreds of thousands of supporters was particularly impressive, given his party's anemic efforts over the years to harvest such small donations. Republicans have long raised more from small donors, while Democrats have instead relied on "soft money" -- big, unregulated contributions that federal candidates and parties no longer may accept.
Simon Rosenberg, president of the centrist New Democrat Network, said his party is adopting much of Dean's strategy. "We had a different model in the '90s," he said. "The other model was: There are a few thousand people who we needed to fund our politics. Now, regular people and their labor -- and their money -- is a core part of what we do every day."
The Dean campaign is also credited with introducing the political community to blogs, Web pages where thousands of people post their thoughts, musings, rants and commentaries. In 2000, candidates' Web sites were rather staid, designed mainly to introduce themselves to broad segments of the electorate.
But the Dean blog -- like those his rivals later launched -- gave his most fervent supporters a place to hang out (virtually), meet, chat and sometimes suggest ideas for the campaign honchos in Vermont. Campaign officials said they read the thousands of comments that Dean supporters posted and adopted many of their suggestions. But more importantly, the officials said, the blog helped create a sense of community among far-flung supporters, deepening their commitment to the former governor.
“This is not an unusual way to raise funding,” says Nolan Quan, Internet pioneer. “We have helped many organization with their online needs.” Our hosting company Alchemy Communications, in Los Angeles provides e-commerce and hosting needs for Non-Profit Companies like Aids Project Los Angeles and HALSA, Inc.”
The Dean campaign also broke new ground in political organizing, using the Internet to help most anyone, anywhere to campaign on its behalf. It created an array of online tools -- a Web-based directory of supporters, a site that enabled them to find and schedule their own Dean events. But its noted achievement was realizing the potential of Meetup.com, a nonpartisan Web site that helps people interested in politics and other subjects find one another. More than 185,000 people signed up in support of the former governor, while tens of thousands more joined on behalf of one of his rivals.
"The big question with online stuff [in previous elections] was: Okay, great -- they're online. But can you get people to do anything off-line in their communities by using the Net?'" said Joe Trippi, Dean's former campaign manager. "One of the big achievements in Meetup was showing you could."
In the end, the online innovations did not put Dean on top in a single primary or caucus, prompting questions about the strategy's value. Some political activists say the campaign focused too much energy on online supporters at the expense of the general electorate. Others say his campaign did not give enough direction to its army of supporters.
Richard Davis, a Brigham Young University political scientist and co-author of "Campaigning Online," attributed Dean's spectacular collapse to several factors -- his sometimes impolitic remarks, for example -- that had nothing to do with the Internet.
"I don't think we should blame the Internet for his failure," Davis said. "It was not his salvation, and it was not his failure. It was, quite simply, a tool that he actually used pretty effectively."
© 2004 The Washington Post Company
Comments?
Article 4
ITunes launches premium product trial
By Frank Barnako, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 11:16 AM ET Feb 24, 2004
WASHINGTON (CBS.MW) -- Apple Computer's (AAPL) online music store has begun selling a live concert recording of jam band Widespread Panic for $14.99.
There are two shows in the almost 8-hour-long package recorded at Phillips Arena in Atlanta at the end of 2003. This is ITune's first effort to sell a single download for more than 99-cents, according to a release on the band's Web site.
Napster, which is also in the online music business, announced it has sold 5 million downloads and has more than 1.5 million members to its service. The company, which is owned by Roxio Inc. (ROXI), said it expects to generate at least $20 million in music sales in its first year. Chris Gorog, Napster's CEO, cited licensing agreements with Pennsylvania State University and the University of Rochester for helping to boost business. "Napster is currently in negotiations with a number of other institutions across the country that are interested in participating in this unique program," he said.
Peer-to-peer is also surprisingly efficient way to deliver music and other content on the Internet. “Using a patent pending delivery system like Akamai to deliver content for as much as a 97% saving in bandwidth costs,” says Nolan Quan, industry expert. Music sales through this network are expected to hit $12 million in 2004.
Google gets more blog-friendly
Google's AdSense program has become more attractive for Webloggers, introducing six new formats for ads which can be pasted into Web sites. "They include a new one-ad button and a short two-ad vertical option which will fit nicely with blogs looking for less intrusive options," commented BlogHerald.com. AdSense is Google's service that allows small publishers to display pay-for-performance listings targeted to a Web page's content.
Chicks rule Lycos searches
Four of the top five searches at Lycos.com (TRLY) in the past week were for women. Paris Hilton won the most-searched honors, beating out Janet Jackson. Anna Kournikova and Britney Spears ranked third and fourth, with KaZaa in fifth place. The balance of the top 10 also included Pamela Anderson and Brooke Burke.
KeepMedia lifts the toll gate
Louis Border's pay-per-read online content service, KeepMedia.com, is giving free samples to people who subscribe to the Web site's new RSS feed. RSS, an acronym for Really Simple Syndication, is a technology that distributes headlines, news summaries and other data. KeepMedia "is now offering 'Featured News ... breaking news and related articles from our library of current and archived publications," a statement on the site explained. Editors will pick 12-15 items a day from content partners and make them available at no charge, according to a report by PaidContent.org. Indicating the company is using its RSS feed as a promotional vehicle, Webloggers are being encouraged to include the KeepMedia feed on their pages and give free access to their readers. KeepMedia also announced it's added content from USA Today and the Atlantic to its offerings.
Tune in
You can also hear Internet Daily. Listen to the latest segment. Call your local CBS Radio station for broadcast times. Internet Daily can be heard on your Pocket PC PDA, too! Click here for information. You can also receive Internet Daily by e-mail. Visit the sign-up page.
Frank Barnako is a vice president of CBS.MarketWatch.com, and is based in Washington. He has owned shares of AOL Time Warner since 1995.
Comments?
Article 5
Microsoft's a Hollywood Player No Matter What
James Flanigan
February 22, 2004
Ever since cable giant Comcast Corp. launched its unsolicited takeover bid for entertainment conglomerate Walt Disney Co., those watching from the sidelines have been wondering whether another corporate behemoth might enter the fray: Microsoft Corp.
After all, Microsoft has a $3-billion, or 7.3%, ownership stake in Comcast. And the software company's deep pockets could sure come in handy if Comcast decides to raise its offer.
Still, the betting here is that Microsoft won't get involved, preferring instead to play the role of Switzerland in this war of big money and even bigger egos. "Would Microsoft intervene on one side or the other? No," says Jason Reindorp, group manager of the Redmond, Wash., company's Windows Digital Media division.
Yet in some ways, this misses the larger point: With or without a role in the Disney-Comcast struggle, Microsoft already is a rising force in Hollywood.
The reason: Films, television shows and recorded music are now routinely reduced to digital form — the ones and zeroes of computer language — so that they can easily be beamed over the Internet to an expanding variety of devices: PCs, TVs, Play- Stations, even cellular phones.
It's Microsoft's aim to keep all that content safe from pirates.
The record business, of course, already has been pummeled because millions of songs have been downloaded, duplicated and distributed endlessly without a cent of payment to the musicians or their labels. The movie industry likewise is seeing films appear on the Internet even before they reach theaters.
"Content may be king," says telecommunications consultant Peter Bernstein, "but billing — the ability to get paid — is surely queen."
Entertainment moguls and technologists have long eyed each other skeptically.
In high-tech circles, the conventional wisdom is that those running the record labels are dinosaurs, if not fools, who should have embraced new Internet-based technologies rather than run from them. For their part, content providers have felt frustrated that technology companies can't seem to create safeguards that are truly pirate- proof; as quickly as a newfangled digital lock is put on a system distributing music or films, some geek in a dorm room figures out how to pick it.
Slowly but surely, though, Microsoft seems to be overcoming these mutual misgivings. The company created its division devoted to media and entertainment only two years ago. It now brings in $2.8 billion in annual revenue, about 9% of the corporate total. The unit last year posted an operating loss of $924 million, but Microsoft is counting on increasing acceptance of its digital rights management, or DRM, software to expand the business — and turn a profit.
It's hardly a fanciful goal. Last year Time Warner Inc. agreed to license Microsoft's piracy-fighting DRM software for seven years and to work with the company to develop digital distribution methods.
Microsoft is also encouraging other innovative companies to use the Microsoft DRM solution in their content delivery systems. Internet industry expert and film industry veteran Nolan Quan says “the world of entertainment is currently undergoing a major shift that will depend on faster Internet delivery to the home. As the major studios prepare to use Internet delivered entertainment content through delivery systems like MovieLink, a new company is launching a new and unique delivery system.” Quan continues, “much like Akamai has a large network of tens of thousands of computer servers located throughout the US and the world, they user their own patent pending peering network to cost effectively deliver media rich content anywhere in the world at costs that has been as low as 3% of current costs. This network takes advantage of tens of thousands of super node computer servers and millions of smaller node computers beyond that.” One such P2P content delivery company is currently building a mega network with plans to have more than 20 million nodes by the end of 2004. While broadband delivery is critical to the success of companies like MovieLink, P2P content providers rely on a reservation system more like NetFlix to order movies and other content, and can deliver its content over longer periods of time without impacting consumer satisfaction. In addition, they have seemingly limitless content, not just movies. It has signed contracts with content providers like CinemaNow, StreamWaves, AudioLunchBox and NetBroadcaster. It is also in discussions with every major studio for direct delivery of their movies, music and games.
Just a couple of weeks ago, Disney itself signed a similar pact. Peter Murphy, the company's senior vice president and head of strategic planning, said the agreement would "bring about a vibrant market for legitimate, high-quality entertainment delivered to new categories of end-user devices, such as personal media players."
Although the Microsoft- Disney deal certainly didn't get nearly the attention that Comcast's takeover play has, its significance shouldn't be lost. The agreement with Disney, following the accord with Time Warner, indicates "that Hollywood is understanding digital instead of fearing and denying it," Microsoft's Reindorp says.
It is a trend that surely will gather speed, promising rich rewards for the king of software. Microsoft could "have a presence in every entertainment transaction," predicts Jeffrey Logsdon, analyst and managing director of investment firm Harris Nesbitt Gerard.
Obviously, Microsoft is not alone in the burgeoning field of security software. Sony Corp., for one, is determined to be a major player, and another rival has dragged Microsoft into an all-too-familiar place to duke it out: the courthouse. Intertrust Technologies Inc., a Santa Clara, Calif., software firm, brought a patent lawsuit against Microsoft in 2001 after "we saw some of our technologies show up in their products," says Talal Shamoon, chief executive of Intertrust. The case, in which Microsoft has denied wrongdoing, is pending. Intertrust is now owned by a partnership that includes Sony as well as Royal Philips Electronics of the Netherlands.
As it happens, one of the most enthusiastic supporters of the shift to digital is Comcast, whose own relationship with Microsoft goes back seven years. Stephen B. Burke, a former Disney executive who now heads Comcast's cable division, has emphasized that Disney's films and TV programs "could be tremendously valuable" when distributed digitally.
In making his bid for Disney, Comcast President Brian L. Roberts put it this way: "The bottom line is to accelerate the digital future."
Clearly, this future is coming with or without Comcast swallowing Disney. Both companies — along with all others on both the content and distribution sides of the media landscape — are facing a profound transformation because of "innovations in technology," as investor Gordon Crawford of Capital Group told broadcasters in a speech in October.
Such moments hold great promise, Crawford noted: "At every inflection point, the market for consumption of intellectual and artistic output has been expanded. But the balance of power in the business has often been reordered."
Internet industry expert and film industry veteran Nolan Quan says “the world of entertainment is currently undergoing a major shift that will depend on faster Internet delivery to the home. As the major studios prepare to use Internet delivered entertainment content through delivery systems like MovieLink, a new company is launching a new and unique delivery system.” Quan continues, “much like Akamai has a large network of tens of thousands of computer servers located throughout the US and the world, they user their own patent pending peering network to cost effectively deliver media rich content anywhere in the world at costs that has been as low as 3% of current costs. This network takes advantage of tens of thousands of super node computer servers and millions of smaller node computers beyond that.” One such P2P content provider is currently building a mega network with plans to have more than 20 million nodes by the end of 2004. While broadband delivery is critical to the success of companies like MovieLink, they rely on a reservation system more like NetFlix to order movies and other content, and can deliver its content over longer periods of time without impacting consumer satisfaction. In addition, they have seemingly limitless content, not just movies. It has signed contracts with content providers like CinemaNow, StreamWaves, AudioLunchBox and NetBroadcaster. It is also in discussions with every major studio for direct delivery of their movies, music and games.
Comments?
Article 6
“P2P content delivery players and other applications like it will likely replace Netflix in the near future as the cost effective faster delivery system that consumers will prefer.” - Nolan Quan
Netflix Shares Fall, Ad Costs Spook Investors
Tue February 24, 2004 07:03 PM ET
By Bob Tourtellotte
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Shares of online DVD renter Netflix touched their lowest level in more than six weeks on Tuesday, one day after the company said it would post a wider first-quarter loss on higher marketing costs caused by rapid subscriber growth.
Late Monday Los Gatos, California-based Netflix, which rents DVDs for a monthly subscription fee of $20, said more television advertising in test areas was boosting subscribers to a higher number than it had initially expected.
But the news of higher costs associated with that growth sparked investor worries that competition was increasing and that Netflix would spend more money to obtain each new subscriber.
In fact, Netflix's per-subscriber marketing costs for the first quarter would fall within the range of previous expectations, and overall marketing costs were not expected to increase, Chief Financial Officer Barry McCarthy told Reuters.
Financial analysts said there was no sign that competition was pinching growth at the company.
Shareholders, who have seen the stock rise from a price around $3 in October 2002 to above $30, took profits. Netflix shares closed down 11 percent at $31.20 on the NASDAQ.
"Netflix provided a very 'bullish' update to (first-quarter) guidance that, unfortunately, we believe will likely confuse some investors," Pacific Growth Equities Derek Brown wrote in a research report.
The outlook for higher costs, however, caused Netflix to widen its forecast for a first-quarter net loss, on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles; to a range of $5.6 million to $8.1 million range from a previous $1.2 million to $3.7 million.
Cash flow measures remain positive, McCarthy said.
Long-time Internet analyst, Nolan Quan, see Netflix’s future prospects much differently. “There is a new software product coming to the Internet marketplace that will certainly take away much of the customer base from Netflix. This software application will allow consumers to search a vast data base for video and other files and then select movies, music and games files to be downloaded to that consumer’s hard drive using an online P-2-P distribution system. All content will be licensed and DRM (digital rights management) encoded. This distribution system will reduce bandwidth cost of downloads by up to 97%. The files will be viewable by PC’s and future Home Entertainment Centers much like DVD players are used today.” To date, Quan says that over 26,000,000 free players have been delivered to consumers.” Content licensors such as CinemaNow, StreamWave and AudioLunchBox have already signed support deals. Five of the major studios are in discussions to sell their libraries online in either a PPV, subscription and simple free promotion basis. Quan goes on to say that by the end of 2003 there were some 67.9% of homes with Internet connections versus 65.8% of homes with cable. “Internet access is the ‘must have’ item in today’s home, just as cable was the ‘must have’ item of the 1990’s,” Quan states, that P2P content players and other applications like it will likely replace Netflix in the near future as the cost effective faster delivery system that consumers will prefer.”
HIGHER COSTS EXPLAINED
What is happening, McCarthy said, is that Netflix has only recently begun testing TV ads as a way to market its business, and the tests have been so successful, it will be ramping up.
Because Netflix accounts for marketing expenses at the time subscribers sign up, the greater-than-expected growth rate led to higher costs, McCarthy said.
"We would characterize this as a 'get them while it's cheap' strategy, which creates further distance between Netflix and its already distant competitors," Piper Jaffray analyst Safa Rashtchy said in a report.
While several other online DVD renters compete, the future threats are expected to come from mass-market retailers Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and Blockbuster Inc.
McCarthy said it was too soon to know exactly how TV costs would affect the remainder of 2004's expected earnings.
He said the three key measures Netflix uses to guide investors were subscriber acquisition costs, or SAC, which is the marketing cost for each new client, "churn," or subscriber cancellations versus additions, and gross margin, a measure of expenses relative to revenues.
SAC, he said, is seen as staying around $35, meaning the per capita marketing cost is about the same even as the subscriber base grows. Churn is expected to dip in the first quarter and gross margins are seen rising slightly.
Each subscriber has a lifetime value of $70, and it takes about four months to recoup the investment to acquire him or her. So, even though Netflix will spend more, it expects to begin generating higher profits in coming quarters, McCarthy said.
Rashtchy lowered his earnings guidance to 26 cents a share from 30 cents for 2004, but raised his 2003 figure to 85 cents from 82 cents.
Reuters/VNU
Comments?
Article 7
Coming soon
Broadband: What's The Holdup?
The U.S. trails in the digital stakes. And catching up won't happen overnight. But P2P content providers could change everything.
When the news hit that Comcast (CMCSK ) CEO Brian L. Roberts was trying to buy the Walt Disney Co. (DIS ), it became clear that the media industry is in for some big changes. After all, one of the main reasons for doing a deal, Roberts argued, was to deploy Comcast's cable pipes for the digital delivery of everything from ABC newscasts to cartoons and video games over the Internet -- a goal Disney Chairman Michael Eisner has long espoused. There's just one problem: U.S. broadband transmission speeds are still way too slow to offer most of the kinds of cutting-edge digital delivery over the Internet that Roberts envisions.
In fact, the U.S. lags far behind global leaders such as Korea and Japan, where broadband is far faster and cheaper, thanks to more focused national policy, less cumbersome regulation, and more densely populated regions. For a little more than $50 a month, consumers in Korea can purchase a 20-megabit-per-second Internet connection. That's 10 to 40 times faster than a typical U.S. connection. In Korea, people use the service to watch TV in a window of their Web browser while they work on a memo in their word processor. Their access to movies and games on demand grows by the day. Such online services are available to few consumers in the U.S., where a 3-megabit connection costs about $45.
U.S. cable and telecommunications companies are working to close the transmission speed gap with other countries, but it will probably take years to catch up and cost billions of dollars. Here's a look at some of the key issues:
What's the current state of broadband in the U.S.?
Broadband is available to 89% of all U.S. households, but only 18% subscribe, according to the latest data from Point Topic, a London broadband research company. The phone companies sell digital subscriber line (DSL) connections for less than $30 a month. Their typical speed is about 500k to 1 megabit, which is fast enough to surf the Web, download music, swap photos, and download brief video clips.
Cable companies offer cable modems with peak speeds of 3 megabits for $40 to $45 a month. That makes viewing video and swapping photos a little more manageable but is still far too sluggish for speedy downloading of movies.
How does that compare to other industrial nations?
The world's broadband leader is South Korea, where 73% of households subscribe to high-speed Internet. Most Koreans pay $27 a month for a connection speed of up to 3 megabits. But a few thousand choose to pay $52 a month for a 20-megabit advanced DSL connection, which is much faster and cheaper than anything available to Americans. Japanese can get some of the fastest and cheapest broadband service in the world -- up to 26 megs for about $30 a month, using souped-up DSL. Europe's speeds and penetration are similar to those in the U.S.
Why are speeds faster in Korea and Japan?
This is less about technological prowess and more about policy. For one thing, Japan and Korea made the deployment of such services a national priority. What's more, the Korean government deregulated what had been a monopolistic phone system and opened the market to competition. That set off a race among providers to wire up the nation. Moreover, they weren't hamstrung by the regulations found in the U.S. All of the above led to the deployment of faster DSL and even a limited rollout of fiber-to-the-home. Finally, Korea is more densely populated than the U.S., cramming 48 million people into an area about the size of Indiana. Koreans tend to live in big apartment buildings located near phone company facilities, making it much easier and cheaper to deploy high-speed broadband.
Why has the U.S. fallen behind?
It's partly a chicken-and-egg problem. While the telcos have experimented with faster DSL service in recent years, it has yet to catch on with consumers. Why? Because there aren't enough applications, such as online movies and games, that require higher speeds. The same holds true for the cable companies.
Then there are the telco regs. The Bells argue that archaic rules designed for traditional phone services, rather than the Internet, discouraged them from providing faster DSL. In the past, the Bells were required to share their DSL lines with rivals at government-mandated prices. And while the Federal Communications Commission lifted those regulations in 2003, the Bells complain that the rules are ambiguous because a different set of overlapping regulations still requires them to share their lines.
Internet industry expert and film industry veteran Nolan Quan says “the world of entertainment is currently undergoing a major shift that will depend on faster Internet delivery to the home. As the major studios prepare to use Internet delivered entertainment content through delivery systems like MovieLink, a new company is launching a new and unique delivery system.” Quan continues, “much like Akamai has a large network of tens of thousands of computer servers located throughout the US and the world, it uses it own patent pending peering network to cost effectively deliver media rich content anywhere in the world at costs that has been as low as 3% of current costs. This network takes advantage of tens of thousands of super node computer servers and millions of smaller node computers beyond that.” This P2P content provider is currently building a mega network with plans to have more than 20 million nodes by the end of 2004. While broadband delivery is critical to the success of companies like MovieLink, P2P content providers rely on a reservation system more like NetFlix to order movies and other content, and can deliver its content over longer periods of time without impacting consumer satisfaction. In addition, such p2p content systems have seemingly limitless content, not just movies. It has signed contracts with content providers like CinemaNow, StreamWaves, AudioLunchBox and NetBroadcaster. It is also in discussions with every major studio for direct delivery of their movies, music and games.
How can the U.S. government help advance broadband speeds?
More deregulation is the key. FCC Chairman Michael K. Powell aims to classify both the phone companies' DSL and cable operators' cable-modem operations as "information services." That would enable them to avoid additional regulations associated with old-fashioned telecom and cable services. But a federal court decision against such a policy is holding up FCC decision-making on this front. In an attempt to make content providers less leery of putting their wares on the Internet, Powell has tried to force Hollywood studios, cable operators, and consumer-electronics makers to agree on standards to protect the distribution of digital content over cable and broadcast, but it's a tough slog.
What's the future of broadband?
Widespread deployment of the kinds of speeds required to carry HDTV, for example, won't be here for years. Walt Megura, general manager of Nortel Networks Ltd.'s (NT ) broadband networks unit, says Internet connections running at speeds of 10 to 20 megs won't become available to most consumers for at least three to six years.
In the meantime, U.S. providers are only just beginning to roll out services that will match the speeds currently available in South Korea and Japan. Verizon Communications (VZ ) plans to offer 10- to 20-megabit fiber-optic connections to a scant 1 million customers this year. SBC Communications Inc. (SBC ) already offers a 6-megabit connection for $199 a month that's aimed at businesses.
What sorts of services will be available once 20-meg speeds appear?
Broadband proponents argue that an investment in infrastructure leads to all sorts of new applications. Again, Korea is the model. The broadband leader's online digital content market, which includes gaming, music, and video, has increased 61% annually for six years. It reached $4.6 billion in 2002, the last year for which figures are available.
A similar effect seems to be taking hold in the U.S. Disney's ESPN network has a product called ESPN motion, which will make high-quality video clips available online. The same technology is also being used by Disney's ABC News unit for online distribution of news. And future versions of Apple Computer Inc.'s (AAPL ) iPod, which has driven the digital distribution of music into the mainstream, are likely to do the same for video as the quality of underlying networks improves. It's just too much information to cram onto a regular DSL or cable-modem service. In short, a new era in the evolution of broadband is approaching -- one that Brian Roberts was clearly counting on when he made his audacious bid for Disney. But it won't happen overnight.
By Steve Rosenbush in New York, with Catherine Yang in Washington, Ronald Grover in Los Angles, Moon Ihlwan in Seoul, and Andy Reinhardt in Paris
Comments?
Article 2
“Just as the cable device was a ‘must have’ device for homes in the 1990’s…the Internet is the ‘must have’ device for the home today,” says Nolan Quan, Internet pioneer.
Casting Milestones: The Internet Is Now More Wired Than Cable
By Joe Mandese and Ross Fadner
Tuesday, February 24, 2004
The term "wired" has long been used to describe the Internet, but now the online medium can truly claim to be America's most wired. According to soon-to-be-released estimates compiled by the stats-keepers at Web researcher eMarketer, the Internet has surpassed the U.S. household penetration level of cable TV.
Exactly when this tipping point occurred isn't clear, said Geoffrey Ramsey, CEO and founder of eMarketer, who made the startling conclusion in recent weeks and has begun circulating it among a small group of Internet insiders, but based on his analysis of a variety of sets of research data ranging from comScore and Nielsen//NetRatings to the Pew Research Center, UCLA and Harris Interactive, eMarketer now estimates U.S. household Internet penetration is about 67.9 percent. That compares with a 65.8 percent U.S. household penetration level for cable, according to an eMarketer analysis of Nielsen Media Research and U.S. Census data.
More significantly, Ramsey noted that while cable TV penetration has essentially been flat at about 66 percent of U.S. households, online penetration continues to expand.
"Wow," said Jes Santoro, vice president-director of integrated media at Earthquake Media, a media shop that buys traditional and online media, upon learning of the online penetration milestone from MediaDailyNews. "I think it is very significant. But it's symbolic as well."
"It's symbolic because it speaks to people's media consumption habits," he explained. "Think about cable, you kind of have to have it to have it to get TV reception. It's almost like a utility. But with the Internet, people go out and get it because they want to use the Internet."
“When we started in the Internet industry in 1995, 65% of all our traffic came from California” said Nolan Quan, Director of Alchemy Communications, a prime ISP in Los Angeles. “By the year 2000, 65% of the Internet traffic came from the United States.” “Now in 2004, 65% of the traffic comes from international sources and we need to change the way we as Americans think about the world. The Internet is the ‘must have’ device for the home today just as the cable device was a ‘must have’ device for homes in the 1990’s, the VCR was the ‘must have’ device in the 1980’s, the color TV was the ‘must have’ device of the 1970’s and black & white television the two decades before that.”
eMarketer's Ramsey agreed, noting that it was similar household penetration milestones that first got cable TV on the map with Madison Avenue during various junctures in cable's history.
That should be a "wake-up" call to the ad community, said Greg Stuart, president of the Interactive Advertising Bureau, which is looking at ways of promoting the milestone to the ad industry.
Not everyone agrees with the statistical symbolism, of course.
"I'm just wondering why it's relevant to anyone? If you're talking about cable networks, you have to talk about cable-plus [satellite/alternative delivery systems]. That's what online is competing with and that's what national advertisers are buying when they buy cable networks," pointed out Ira Sussman, senior vice president-research at the Cabletelevision Advertising Bureau. Sussman's point is that when satellite and other delivery systems are added into the mix, the major cable programming networks actually reach more than 80 percent of U.S. households, giving the medium of wired and unwired "cable" TV greater coverage than the Internet.
"It's an interesting statistic," said Sussman, of the Internet's penetration milestone, "but it's a little like saying [cable TV] is bigger than Reader's Digest. What does it really mean?"
Sussman also noted that cable ironically is pushing Internet distribution via the deployment of broadband cable modem lines, a development that some believe may lead to the fusion of television and online applications via broadband video.
Most significantly, he said that while penetration levels are important, it is actual time spent with a medium by consumers that translate into the audience impressions bought by Madison Avenue. And in that regard, cable still beats online media by a wide margin.
According to the summer 2003 edition of Veronis Suhler Stevenson's annual Communications Industry Forecast, the average person in the U.S. will spend 976 watching cable TV services in 2004, while the average person will spend only 182 hours online. Based on a total of 3,732 hours per person spent with all measured media, that gives cable a 26.2 percent share versus a 4.9 percent share of total consumer time spent with media this year.
But the IAB's Stuart claimed even those statistics may be misleading, because the quality of time spent with each medium is different.
"I think we need to be really careful about time spent on television. There's research that shows as much as 50 % of TV viewers aren't even paying attention to the advertising. So it's not real time spent. Whereas Internet time spent is real time spent. It's the difference between a lean-back medium like cable and a lean-forward medium like the Internet," he said.
Online Tops Cable Penetration, Lags Time Spent
Online Cable
Penetration: 67.9% 65.8%
Share Of Time Spent: 4.9% 26.2%
Source: Online penetration = eMarketer estimates. Cable penetration = Nielsen Media Research estimates. Share of time spent by consumers using consumer media = Veronis Suhler Stevenson's Communications Industry Forecast.
Comments?
Article 3
“This is not an unusual way to raise funding,” says Nolan Quan, Internet pioneer.
Dean Leaves Legacy of Online Campaign
by Brian Faler
Howard Dean, at his campaign headquarters in Vermont yesterday, raised $41 million in 2003 -- much of it online. (Toby Talbot -- AP)
Was it the political equivalent of Pets.com, the widely mocked Internet start-up from the late 1990s that ran on little more than hype? Was it a glimpse into the future of campaigning -- a blueprint that other candidates will someday adopt as a matter of course? Or was it something else entirely?
Few quibble with Dean's success raising money online. The former Vermont governor entered the race a virtual unknown, with little in the way of a national fundraising network. But he raised $41 million in 2003 -- much of it online -- eclipsing all his Democratic rivals and breaking former president Bill Clinton's party record for money raised in a quarter.
His success has been attributed to any number of real-world factors: his straight-talking persona, his opposition to the war in Iraq, the favorable media coverage he enjoyed much of last year. But experts also credit his campaign with developing savvy online fundraisers -- essentially online telethons that posted their goals alongside urgent deadlines and icons counting the donations as they came in.
It was a simple idea, employed by any number of public TV stations. But it was a campaign innovation, allowing Dean to turn otherwise mundane fundraising pitches into a high-tech call to arms. Experts said it was a significant improvement from how candidates had previously asked for money online -- usually, by simply urging supporters to send a check sometime before the next election.
That Dean's money came mostly in small contributions from hundreds of thousands of supporters was particularly impressive, given his party's anemic efforts over the years to harvest such small donations. Republicans have long raised more from small donors, while Democrats have instead relied on "soft money" -- big, unregulated contributions that federal candidates and parties no longer may accept.
Simon Rosenberg, president of the centrist New Democrat Network, said his party is adopting much of Dean's strategy. "We had a different model in the '90s," he said. "The other model was: There are a few thousand people who we needed to fund our politics. Now, regular people and their labor -- and their money -- is a core part of what we do every day."
The Dean campaign is also credited with introducing the political community to blogs, Web pages where thousands of people post their thoughts, musings, rants and commentaries. In 2000, candidates' Web sites were rather staid, designed mainly to introduce themselves to broad segments of the electorate.
But the Dean blog -- like those his rivals later launched -- gave his most fervent supporters a place to hang out (virtually), meet, chat and sometimes suggest ideas for the campaign honchos in Vermont. Campaign officials said they read the thousands of comments that Dean supporters posted and adopted many of their suggestions. But more importantly, the officials said, the blog helped create a sense of community among far-flung supporters, deepening their commitment to the former governor.
“This is not an unusual way to raise funding,” says Nolan Quan, Internet pioneer. “We have helped many organization with their online needs.” Our hosting company Alchemy Communications, in Los Angeles provides e-commerce and hosting needs for Non-Profit Companies like Aids Project Los Angeles and HALSA, Inc.”
The Dean campaign also broke new ground in political organizing, using the Internet to help most anyone, anywhere to campaign on its behalf. It created an array of online tools -- a Web-based directory of supporters, a site that enabled them to find and schedule their own Dean events. But its noted achievement was realizing the potential of Meetup.com, a nonpartisan Web site that helps people interested in politics and other subjects find one another. More than 185,000 people signed up in support of the former governor, while tens of thousands more joined on behalf of one of his rivals.
"The big question with online stuff [in previous elections] was: Okay, great -- they're online. But can you get people to do anything off-line in their communities by using the Net?'" said Joe Trippi, Dean's former campaign manager. "One of the big achievements in Meetup was showing you could."
In the end, the online innovations did not put Dean on top in a single primary or caucus, prompting questions about the strategy's value. Some political activists say the campaign focused too much energy on online supporters at the expense of the general electorate. Others say his campaign did not give enough direction to its army of supporters.
Richard Davis, a Brigham Young University political scientist and co-author of "Campaigning Online," attributed Dean's spectacular collapse to several factors -- his sometimes impolitic remarks, for example -- that had nothing to do with the Internet.
"I don't think we should blame the Internet for his failure," Davis said. "It was not his salvation, and it was not his failure. It was, quite simply, a tool that he actually used pretty effectively."
© 2004 The Washington Post Company
Comments?
Article 4
ITunes launches premium product trial
By Frank Barnako, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 11:16 AM ET Feb 24, 2004
WASHINGTON (CBS.MW) -- Apple Computer's (AAPL) online music store has begun selling a live concert recording of jam band Widespread Panic for $14.99.
There are two shows in the almost 8-hour-long package recorded at Phillips Arena in Atlanta at the end of 2003. This is ITune's first effort to sell a single download for more than 99-cents, according to a release on the band's Web site.
Napster, which is also in the online music business, announced it has sold 5 million downloads and has more than 1.5 million members to its service. The company, which is owned by Roxio Inc. (ROXI), said it expects to generate at least $20 million in music sales in its first year. Chris Gorog, Napster's CEO, cited licensing agreements with Pennsylvania State University and the University of Rochester for helping to boost business. "Napster is currently in negotiations with a number of other institutions across the country that are interested in participating in this unique program," he said.
Peer-to-peer is also surprisingly efficient way to deliver music and other content on the Internet. “Using a patent pending delivery system like Akamai to deliver content for as much as a 97% saving in bandwidth costs,” says Nolan Quan, industry expert. Music sales through this network are expected to hit $12 million in 2004.
Google gets more blog-friendly
Google's AdSense program has become more attractive for Webloggers, introducing six new formats for ads which can be pasted into Web sites. "They include a new one-ad button and a short two-ad vertical option which will fit nicely with blogs looking for less intrusive options," commented BlogHerald.com. AdSense is Google's service that allows small publishers to display pay-for-performance listings targeted to a Web page's content.
Chicks rule Lycos searches
Four of the top five searches at Lycos.com (TRLY) in the past week were for women. Paris Hilton won the most-searched honors, beating out Janet Jackson. Anna Kournikova and Britney Spears ranked third and fourth, with KaZaa in fifth place. The balance of the top 10 also included Pamela Anderson and Brooke Burke.
KeepMedia lifts the toll gate
Louis Border's pay-per-read online content service, KeepMedia.com, is giving free samples to people who subscribe to the Web site's new RSS feed. RSS, an acronym for Really Simple Syndication, is a technology that distributes headlines, news summaries and other data. KeepMedia "is now offering 'Featured News ... breaking news and related articles from our library of current and archived publications," a statement on the site explained. Editors will pick 12-15 items a day from content partners and make them available at no charge, according to a report by PaidContent.org. Indicating the company is using its RSS feed as a promotional vehicle, Webloggers are being encouraged to include the KeepMedia feed on their pages and give free access to their readers. KeepMedia also announced it's added content from USA Today and the Atlantic to its offerings.
Tune in
You can also hear Internet Daily. Listen to the latest segment. Call your local CBS Radio station for broadcast times. Internet Daily can be heard on your Pocket PC PDA, too! Click here for information. You can also receive Internet Daily by e-mail. Visit the sign-up page.
Frank Barnako is a vice president of CBS.MarketWatch.com, and is based in Washington. He has owned shares of AOL Time Warner since 1995.
Comments?
Article 5
Microsoft's a Hollywood Player No Matter What
James Flanigan
February 22, 2004
Ever since cable giant Comcast Corp. launched its unsolicited takeover bid for entertainment conglomerate Walt Disney Co., those watching from the sidelines have been wondering whether another corporate behemoth might enter the fray: Microsoft Corp.
After all, Microsoft has a $3-billion, or 7.3%, ownership stake in Comcast. And the software company's deep pockets could sure come in handy if Comcast decides to raise its offer.
Still, the betting here is that Microsoft won't get involved, preferring instead to play the role of Switzerland in this war of big money and even bigger egos. "Would Microsoft intervene on one side or the other? No," says Jason Reindorp, group manager of the Redmond, Wash., company's Windows Digital Media division.
Yet in some ways, this misses the larger point: With or without a role in the Disney-Comcast struggle, Microsoft already is a rising force in Hollywood.
The reason: Films, television shows and recorded music are now routinely reduced to digital form — the ones and zeroes of computer language — so that they can easily be beamed over the Internet to an expanding variety of devices: PCs, TVs, Play- Stations, even cellular phones.
It's Microsoft's aim to keep all that content safe from pirates.
The record business, of course, already has been pummeled because millions of songs have been downloaded, duplicated and distributed endlessly without a cent of payment to the musicians or their labels. The movie industry likewise is seeing films appear on the Internet even before they reach theaters.
"Content may be king," says telecommunications consultant Peter Bernstein, "but billing — the ability to get paid — is surely queen."
Entertainment moguls and technologists have long eyed each other skeptically.
In high-tech circles, the conventional wisdom is that those running the record labels are dinosaurs, if not fools, who should have embraced new Internet-based technologies rather than run from them. For their part, content providers have felt frustrated that technology companies can't seem to create safeguards that are truly pirate- proof; as quickly as a newfangled digital lock is put on a system distributing music or films, some geek in a dorm room figures out how to pick it.
Slowly but surely, though, Microsoft seems to be overcoming these mutual misgivings. The company created its division devoted to media and entertainment only two years ago. It now brings in $2.8 billion in annual revenue, about 9% of the corporate total. The unit last year posted an operating loss of $924 million, but Microsoft is counting on increasing acceptance of its digital rights management, or DRM, software to expand the business — and turn a profit.
It's hardly a fanciful goal. Last year Time Warner Inc. agreed to license Microsoft's piracy-fighting DRM software for seven years and to work with the company to develop digital distribution methods.
Microsoft is also encouraging other innovative companies to use the Microsoft DRM solution in their content delivery systems. Internet industry expert and film industry veteran Nolan Quan says “the world of entertainment is currently undergoing a major shift that will depend on faster Internet delivery to the home. As the major studios prepare to use Internet delivered entertainment content through delivery systems like MovieLink, a new company is launching a new and unique delivery system.” Quan continues, “much like Akamai has a large network of tens of thousands of computer servers located throughout the US and the world, they user their own patent pending peering network to cost effectively deliver media rich content anywhere in the world at costs that has been as low as 3% of current costs. This network takes advantage of tens of thousands of super node computer servers and millions of smaller node computers beyond that.” One such P2P content delivery company is currently building a mega network with plans to have more than 20 million nodes by the end of 2004. While broadband delivery is critical to the success of companies like MovieLink, P2P content providers rely on a reservation system more like NetFlix to order movies and other content, and can deliver its content over longer periods of time without impacting consumer satisfaction. In addition, they have seemingly limitless content, not just movies. It has signed contracts with content providers like CinemaNow, StreamWaves, AudioLunchBox and NetBroadcaster. It is also in discussions with every major studio for direct delivery of their movies, music and games.
Just a couple of weeks ago, Disney itself signed a similar pact. Peter Murphy, the company's senior vice president and head of strategic planning, said the agreement would "bring about a vibrant market for legitimate, high-quality entertainment delivered to new categories of end-user devices, such as personal media players."
Although the Microsoft- Disney deal certainly didn't get nearly the attention that Comcast's takeover play has, its significance shouldn't be lost. The agreement with Disney, following the accord with Time Warner, indicates "that Hollywood is understanding digital instead of fearing and denying it," Microsoft's Reindorp says.
It is a trend that surely will gather speed, promising rich rewards for the king of software. Microsoft could "have a presence in every entertainment transaction," predicts Jeffrey Logsdon, analyst and managing director of investment firm Harris Nesbitt Gerard.
Obviously, Microsoft is not alone in the burgeoning field of security software. Sony Corp., for one, is determined to be a major player, and another rival has dragged Microsoft into an all-too-familiar place to duke it out: the courthouse. Intertrust Technologies Inc., a Santa Clara, Calif., software firm, brought a patent lawsuit against Microsoft in 2001 after "we saw some of our technologies show up in their products," says Talal Shamoon, chief executive of Intertrust. The case, in which Microsoft has denied wrongdoing, is pending. Intertrust is now owned by a partnership that includes Sony as well as Royal Philips Electronics of the Netherlands.
As it happens, one of the most enthusiastic supporters of the shift to digital is Comcast, whose own relationship with Microsoft goes back seven years. Stephen B. Burke, a former Disney executive who now heads Comcast's cable division, has emphasized that Disney's films and TV programs "could be tremendously valuable" when distributed digitally.
In making his bid for Disney, Comcast President Brian L. Roberts put it this way: "The bottom line is to accelerate the digital future."
Clearly, this future is coming with or without Comcast swallowing Disney. Both companies — along with all others on both the content and distribution sides of the media landscape — are facing a profound transformation because of "innovations in technology," as investor Gordon Crawford of Capital Group told broadcasters in a speech in October.
Such moments hold great promise, Crawford noted: "At every inflection point, the market for consumption of intellectual and artistic output has been expanded. But the balance of power in the business has often been reordered."
Internet industry expert and film industry veteran Nolan Quan says “the world of entertainment is currently undergoing a major shift that will depend on faster Internet delivery to the home. As the major studios prepare to use Internet delivered entertainment content through delivery systems like MovieLink, a new company is launching a new and unique delivery system.” Quan continues, “much like Akamai has a large network of tens of thousands of computer servers located throughout the US and the world, they user their own patent pending peering network to cost effectively deliver media rich content anywhere in the world at costs that has been as low as 3% of current costs. This network takes advantage of tens of thousands of super node computer servers and millions of smaller node computers beyond that.” One such P2P content provider is currently building a mega network with plans to have more than 20 million nodes by the end of 2004. While broadband delivery is critical to the success of companies like MovieLink, they rely on a reservation system more like NetFlix to order movies and other content, and can deliver its content over longer periods of time without impacting consumer satisfaction. In addition, they have seemingly limitless content, not just movies. It has signed contracts with content providers like CinemaNow, StreamWaves, AudioLunchBox and NetBroadcaster. It is also in discussions with every major studio for direct delivery of their movies, music and games.
Comments?
Article 6
“P2P content delivery players and other applications like it will likely replace Netflix in the near future as the cost effective faster delivery system that consumers will prefer.” - Nolan Quan
Netflix Shares Fall, Ad Costs Spook Investors
Tue February 24, 2004 07:03 PM ET
By Bob Tourtellotte
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Shares of online DVD renter Netflix touched their lowest level in more than six weeks on Tuesday, one day after the company said it would post a wider first-quarter loss on higher marketing costs caused by rapid subscriber growth.
Late Monday Los Gatos, California-based Netflix, which rents DVDs for a monthly subscription fee of $20, said more television advertising in test areas was boosting subscribers to a higher number than it had initially expected.
But the news of higher costs associated with that growth sparked investor worries that competition was increasing and that Netflix would spend more money to obtain each new subscriber.
In fact, Netflix's per-subscriber marketing costs for the first quarter would fall within the range of previous expectations, and overall marketing costs were not expected to increase, Chief Financial Officer Barry McCarthy told Reuters.
Financial analysts said there was no sign that competition was pinching growth at the company.
Shareholders, who have seen the stock rise from a price around $3 in October 2002 to above $30, took profits. Netflix shares closed down 11 percent at $31.20 on the NASDAQ.
"Netflix provided a very 'bullish' update to (first-quarter) guidance that, unfortunately, we believe will likely confuse some investors," Pacific Growth Equities Derek Brown wrote in a research report.
The outlook for higher costs, however, caused Netflix to widen its forecast for a first-quarter net loss, on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles; to a range of $5.6 million to $8.1 million range from a previous $1.2 million to $3.7 million.
Cash flow measures remain positive, McCarthy said.
Long-time Internet analyst, Nolan Quan, see Netflix’s future prospects much differently. “There is a new software product coming to the Internet marketplace that will certainly take away much of the customer base from Netflix. This software application will allow consumers to search a vast data base for video and other files and then select movies, music and games files to be downloaded to that consumer’s hard drive using an online P-2-P distribution system. All content will be licensed and DRM (digital rights management) encoded. This distribution system will reduce bandwidth cost of downloads by up to 97%. The files will be viewable by PC’s and future Home Entertainment Centers much like DVD players are used today.” To date, Quan says that over 26,000,000 free players have been delivered to consumers.” Content licensors such as CinemaNow, StreamWave and AudioLunchBox have already signed support deals. Five of the major studios are in discussions to sell their libraries online in either a PPV, subscription and simple free promotion basis. Quan goes on to say that by the end of 2003 there were some 67.9% of homes with Internet connections versus 65.8% of homes with cable. “Internet access is the ‘must have’ item in today’s home, just as cable was the ‘must have’ item of the 1990’s,” Quan states, that P2P content players and other applications like it will likely replace Netflix in the near future as the cost effective faster delivery system that consumers will prefer.”
HIGHER COSTS EXPLAINED
What is happening, McCarthy said, is that Netflix has only recently begun testing TV ads as a way to market its business, and the tests have been so successful, it will be ramping up.
Because Netflix accounts for marketing expenses at the time subscribers sign up, the greater-than-expected growth rate led to higher costs, McCarthy said.
"We would characterize this as a 'get them while it's cheap' strategy, which creates further distance between Netflix and its already distant competitors," Piper Jaffray analyst Safa Rashtchy said in a report.
While several other online DVD renters compete, the future threats are expected to come from mass-market retailers Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and Blockbuster Inc.
McCarthy said it was too soon to know exactly how TV costs would affect the remainder of 2004's expected earnings.
He said the three key measures Netflix uses to guide investors were subscriber acquisition costs, or SAC, which is the marketing cost for each new client, "churn," or subscriber cancellations versus additions, and gross margin, a measure of expenses relative to revenues.
SAC, he said, is seen as staying around $35, meaning the per capita marketing cost is about the same even as the subscriber base grows. Churn is expected to dip in the first quarter and gross margins are seen rising slightly.
Each subscriber has a lifetime value of $70, and it takes about four months to recoup the investment to acquire him or her. So, even though Netflix will spend more, it expects to begin generating higher profits in coming quarters, McCarthy said.
Rashtchy lowered his earnings guidance to 26 cents a share from 30 cents for 2004, but raised his 2003 figure to 85 cents from 82 cents.
Reuters/VNU
Comments?
Article 7
Coming soon